Repository navigation
Conversation
…flag Signed-off-by: Raphael Bizos <r.bizos@criteo.com>
Signed-off-by: Raphael Bizos <r.bizos@criteo.com>
dashpole
self-requested a review
October 28, 2026 16:04
Author
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part of #1210.
Preparing for the OpenMetrics 2.0 exposition by making room for a separate exposition function.
Until every metric type is supported, version 2.0.0 is still served by the 1.0 writer, so nothing
changes for users.
The 2.0 exposition supports only
gauge,infoandunknownmetric types.Follow-ups
chosen by content negotiation alone. The current native histogram implementation will be moved to OM2.0 exposition branch.
@csmarchbanks