[Precogs AI] Auto-Fix: 1 vulnerabilities in 1 files#22
Open
sameer6pre wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Precogs Auto-Fix — 1 Vulnerabilities Fixed
Vulnerability Details
cpp-programming/Lab_11/Source.cppExplanation:
Primary: Use of Uninitialized Variable (CWE-457) — The local variable 'user_choice_1' is declared but not initialized (line 229). Immediately afterwards it is read in the while-condition (line 232). Reading an uninitialized automatic variable is undefined behavior: it may be a large positive/negative value or any bit pattern, causing the loop to execute unexpectedly, skip execution, or crash. This can lead to program instability, unpredictable control flow, and in some contexts can be leveraged by attackers to influence program behavior or crash the application.
Also found: Double Free / Explicit Destructor Call on Automatic Object (CWE-415) — The automatic (stack) object 'a' of type Account is created at line 207. The code then explicitly calls its destructor (line 209). At the end of the scope, the destructor will be called again implicitly when 'a' goes out of scope. Explicitly invoking the destructor of an automatic object leads to undefined behavior (double destruction). If the destructor manages resources (memory, file handles, etc.), this can cause resource corruption, crashes, or potential security holes (use-after-free).
Uncontrolled Recursion (Denial of Service) (CWE-674) — When an invalid menu choice is provided, the code calls main() recursively (line 268) to re-display the menu. Recursively invoking main (or any function) in this manner can lead to unbounded recursion if the user repeatedly provides invalid input, causing stack exhaustion and denial of service. Instead of recursion, iterative control flow (loops) should be used to re-prompt the user.
Please review and address the issue accordingly.
This PR was auto-generated by Precogs AI. Review the changes and verify CI results before merging.