You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 6, 2026. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 6, 2026. It is now read-only.
BigQuery Storage API integrations should accept either v1beta1 or v1 client #84
This is good, as it keeps packages such as pandas-gbq from breaking, but shouldn't we start thinking about migrating folks to the v1 endpoint? To do that without causing too much disruption, the to_dataframe, magics, and DB-API integrations should accept either v1beta1 or v1 clients for an extended period of time.
@tswast Now that the BQ Storage client is stable, #55 will start using it as a default, and also migrate to v1 stable from v1beta1.
If this would indeed represent to big a disruption, the PR needs to be adjusted to support both Storage client versions. Possibly with a warning if beta client is used?
Also feel free to bring this point up on the linked PR, if you have time, as this feature request directly affects it, thanks!
Noted. We will add this then, and branch on the BQ Storage client type (and if v1beta1 is passed, the old logic for constructing the session will be used).
Activity
plamut commentedon Apr 28, 2020
@tswast Now that the BQ Storage client is stable, #55 will start using it as a default, and also migrate to v1 stable from v1beta1.
If this would indeed represent to big a disruption, the PR needs to be adjusted to support both Storage client versions. Possibly with a warning if beta client is used?
Also feel free to bring this point up on the linked PR, if you have time, as this feature request directly affects it, thanks!
tswast commentedon Apr 28, 2020
Yes, that would be a very big disruption. Definitely a breaking change, as it would break pandas-gbq among others.
plamut commentedon Apr 28, 2020
Noted. We will add this then, and branch on the BQ Storage client type (and if v1beta1 is passed, the old logic for constructing the session will be used).