Skip to content

Bigtable: Admin should have proto utility methods #3141

New issue
New issue
Closed
Closed
Bigtable: Admin should have proto utility methods#3141
Assignees
igorbernstein2
Labels
api: bigtableIssues related to the Bigtable API.priority: p2Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release.type: feature request‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Description

@sduskis
sduskis
opened on Apr 10, 2018

There are some complex protobuf objects. Here are some possibilities where utilities might come in handy:

  • any message with "oneof" gets confusjng, since users set multiple values (AppProfile, DropRowRangeRequest, ModifyColumnFamiliesRequest)
  • Instance messages are complex
  • PartialUpdateInstanceRequest use google.protobuf.FieldMask which is quite confusing
  • CheckConsistency is used for for polling, so it's ideal having a utility for this kind of functionality
  • "TableExists" type functionality should use ListTables instead of GetTable, since it's less expensive. Users should have a clear API that produces the most efficient calls.

Activity

  1. pongad
    assigned
    igorbernstein2
    on Apr 10, 2018
  2. pongad
    added
    api: bigtableIssues related to the Bigtable API.
    on Apr 10, 2018
  3. JustinBeckwith
    added
    triage meI really want to be triaged.
    🚨 criticalP0 critical issue. Requires immediate fix
    on Jun 8, 2018
  4. yihanzhen
    added
    type: feature request‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
    priority: p2Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release.
    and removed
    🚨 criticalP0 critical issue. Requires immediate fix
    triage meI really want to be triaged.
    on Jun 20, 2018

  5. yihanzhen commented on Jun 20, 2018

    @yihanzhen
    yihanzhen
    on Jun 20, 2018
    Contributor

    I'm not sure about priority. Feel free to bump if necessary.

  6. igorbernstein2 commented on Jun 20, 2018

    @igorbernstein2
    igorbernstein2
    on Jun 20, 2018
    Contributor

    This is currently being worked on:
    #3395

  7. igorbernstein2 commented on Sep 5, 2018

    @igorbernstein2
    igorbernstein2
    on Sep 5, 2018
    Contributor

    I'm still in the process of cleaning things up, but the wrappers have landed.

  8. igorbernstein2
    closed this as completedon Sep 5, 2018
  9. chingor13
    added 4 commits that reference this issue on Mar 24, 2026

    feat: add Batcher#close(timeout) and Batcher#cancelOutstanding (#3141)

    68fd533

    chore(main): release 2.45.0 (#3139)

    fbf904c

    feat: support multiplexed sessions for RO transactions (#3141)

    41d776f

    test(deps): update test libraries (#3141)

    b58e165
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

api: bigtableIssues related to the Bigtable API.priority: p2Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release.type: feature request‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions