diff --git a/.github/workflows/main.yml b/.github/workflows/main.yml index 28c4f72..cc64f89 100644 --- a/.github/workflows/main.yml +++ b/.github/workflows/main.yml @@ -53,19 +53,21 @@ jobs: file: Dockerfile platforms: linux/amd64,linux/arm64 tags: wurstbrot/dsomm-yaml-generation:${{ steps.get-version.outputs.version }},wurstbrot/dsomm-yaml-generation:latest + build-args: | + DSOMM_VERSION=${{ steps.get-version.outputs.version }} + GITHUB_REPOSITORY=${{ github.repository }} - name: Extract generated files from docker image run: | docker run -d --name=yaml --entrypoint="/bin/sleep" wurstbrot/dsomm-yaml-generation:${{ steps.get-version.outputs.version }} 60 - docker cp yaml:/var/www/html/generated/model.yaml generated/model.yaml - docker cp yaml:/var/www/html/generated/dependency-tree.md generated/dependency-tree.md - - name: Replace version placeholder in model.yaml - run: | - sed -i "s/__VERSION_PLACEHOLDER__/${{ steps.get-version.outputs.version }}/g" src/assets/YAML/model.yaml + docker cp yaml:/var/www/html/generated/model.yaml generated/model.yaml + docker cp yaml:/var/www/html/generated/dependency-tree.md generated/dependency-tree.md + - name: Force add ignored file + run: git add -f generated/model.yaml generated/dependency-tree.md - name: Commit all changed files back to the repository uses: planetscale/ghcommit-action@v0.1.6 with: - commit_message: "🤖 fmt" + commit_message: "🤖 push ${{ steps.get-version.outputs.version }}" repo: ${{ github.repository }} branch: ${{ github.head_ref || github.ref_name }} env: - GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{secrets.ACCESS_TOKEN}} \ No newline at end of file + GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{secrets.ACCESS_TOKEN}} diff --git a/.releaserc.json b/.releaserc.json index 759d39b..8ae6300 100644 --- a/.releaserc.json +++ b/.releaserc.json @@ -4,11 +4,7 @@ [ "@semantic-release/commit-analyzer", { - "preset": "angular", - "releaseRules": [ - {"breaking": true, "release": "minor"}, - {"tag": "Breaking", "release": "minor"} - ] + "preset": "angular" } ], "@semantic-release/release-notes-generator", diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md index 22dc533..61e7414 100644 --- a/CHANGELOG.md +++ b/CHANGELOG.md @@ -1,3 +1,84 @@ +## [4.3.1](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/compare/v4.3.0...v4.3.1) (2026-04-27) + + +### Bug Fixes + +* correct typo in blue-green-deployment implementation key ([dc6af16](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/commit/dc6af16d6aa497563c2f27110ed4308c20c363d7)), closes [#76](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/issues/76) + +# [4.3.0](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/compare/v4.2.0...v4.3.0) (2026-04-27) + + +### Features + +* add Canary deployment activity to Deployment dimension ([f889bca](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/commit/f889bca3e8485a9bc67302d42b41d4ba4bbf1b23)) + +# [4.2.0](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/compare/v4.1.0...v4.2.0) (2026-01-28) + + +### Features + +* new version ([b971cb0](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/commit/b971cb0d326ffe2630e932a915ff5288771dabb5)) + +# [4.1.0](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/compare/v4.0.0...v4.1.0) (2026-01-15) + + +### Features + +* trigger release ([e83e71f](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/commit/e83e71f62e324abcbc4b1911af56e6ef5543d3af)) + +# [4.0.0](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/compare/v1.25.0...v1.26.0) (2026-01-05) + + +* enhance version number to 4 + + +### Bug Fixes + +* generated folder ([fd323eb](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/commit/fd323ebfd1ef5483006ae2577e8d5742607aa7eb)) + +# [1.26.0](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/compare/v1.25.0...v1.26.0) (2026-01-05) + + +* fix\!: build ([b9eef67](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/commit/b9eef67f450590e89d7b8763e453a712fb954075)) + + +### Bug Fixes + +* generated folder ([fd323eb](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/commit/fd323ebfd1ef5483006ae2577e8d5742607aa7eb)) + + +### BREAKING CHANGES + +* Updated Docker build process and YAML generation structure + +🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) + +Co-Authored-By: Claude + +# [1.25.0](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/compare/v1.24.0...v1.25.0) (2025-12-15) + + +* feat!: new structure ([2766a0a](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/commit/2766a0ac2ced849735e5d63f351bc85d5137a0af)) + + +### BREAKING CHANGES + +* generated moved to root with model.yaml instead of generated.yaml + +# [1.24.0](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/compare/v1.23.1...v1.24.0) (2025-12-15) + + +* feat!: new structure ([4fc201f](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/commit/4fc201f9e7e6c8210670cad65d37d8b3d82b9c9c)) + + +### BREAKING CHANGES + +* generated moved to root with model.yaml instead of generated.yaml + +### Bug Fixes + +* Modify YAML generation to include version placeholder ([37958b5](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/commit/37958b54e20b80b4401980a28b07616c964f35d5)) + ## [1.20.1](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data/compare/v1.20.0...v1.20.1) (2025-11-24) diff --git a/Dockerfile b/Dockerfile index a5be9e1..acd540f 100644 --- a/Dockerfile +++ b/Dockerfile @@ -1,6 +1,11 @@ FROM php:apache-bullseye + +ARG DSOMM_VERSION=dev +ARG GITHUB_REPOSITORY=DevSecOpsMaturityModel-data + RUN apt-get update && apt-get -y install apt-utils libyaml-dev wget unzip && wget -O composer-setup.php https://getcomposer.org/installer && php composer-setup.php --install-dir=/usr/local/bin --filename=composer COPY yaml-generation /var/www/html/yaml-generation +COPY generated /var/www/html/generated COPY src /var/www/html/src RUN cd /var/www/html/yaml-generation && composer install \ --ignore-platform-reqs \ @@ -10,6 +15,7 @@ RUN cd /var/www/html/yaml-generation && composer install \ --prefer-dist RUN pecl channel-update pecl.php.net && pecl install yaml && docker-php-ext-enable yaml -RUN cd /var/www/html && php yaml-generation/generateDimensions.php -workdir /var/www/html -CMD php yaml-generation/generateDimensions.php +RUN cd /var/www/html && GITHUB_REPOSITORY="${GITHUB_REPOSITORY}" php /var/www/html/yaml-generation/generateDimensions.php && sed -i "s/__VERSION_PLACEHOLDER__/${DSOMM_VERSION}/g" /var/www/html/generated/model.yaml +WORKDIR /var/www/html + +CMD [ "php", "yaml-generation/generateDimensions.php" ] diff --git a/generated/dependency-tree.md b/generated/dependency-tree.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1c7aa3d --- /dev/null +++ b/generated/dependency-tree.md @@ -0,0 +1,271 @@ +## DSOMM Activity Dependencies + +The activities in this DSOMM Model have the following dependencies. + +```mermaid +graph LR + +0(L2 Pinning of artifacts) +1(L1 Defined build process) +2(L2 SBOM of components) +3(L3 Signing of code) +4(L5 Signing of artifacts) +5(L1 Automated deployment process) +6(L1 Defined deployment process) +7(L1 Version control) +8(L1 Inventory of production components) +9(L2 Inventory of production artifacts) +10(L3 Handover of confidential parameters) +11(L2 Environment depending configuration parameters secrets) +12(L3 Inventory of production dependencies) +13(L3 Rolling update on deployment) +14(L4 Canary deployment) +15(L4 Same artifact for environments) +16(L4 Usage of feature toggles) +17(L5 Blue/Green Deployment) +18(L4 Smoke Test) +19(L2 Automated merge of automated PRs) +20(L1 Automated PRs for patches) +21(L3 Automated deployment of automated PRs) +22(L3 Creation of simple abuse stories) +23(L1 Conduction of simple threat modeling on technical level) +24(L3 Creation of threat modeling processes and standards) +25(L4 Conduction of advanced threat modeling) +26(L5 Creation of advanced abuse stories) +27(L2 Regular security training of security champions) +28(L2 Each team has a security champion) +29(L2 Determining the protection requirement) +30(L2 App. Hardening Level 1) +31(L1 App. Hardening Level 1 50%) +32(L3 App. Hardening Level 2 75%) +33(L4 App. Hardening Level 2) +34(L5 App. Hardening Level 3) +35(L3 Block force pushes) +36(L2 Require a PR before merging) +37(L3 Dismiss stale PR approvals) +38(L3 Require status checks to pass) +39(L2 Backup) +40(L2 MFA) +41(L1 MFA for admins) +42(L2 Usage of test and production environments) +43(L2 Virtual environments are limited) +44(L2 Applications are running in virtualized environments) +45(L3 Immutable infrastructure) +46(L3 Infrastructure as Code) +47(L3 Limitation of system events) +48(L3 Audit of system events) +49(L3 Usage of security by default for components) +50(L3 WAF baseline) +51(L1 Context-aware output encoding) +52(L4 Production near environments are used by developers) +53(L4 WAF medium) +54(L5 WAF Advanced) +55(L2 Centralized application logging) +56(L2 Alerting) +57(L3 Visualized logging) +58(L1 Centralized system logging) +59(L5 Correlation of security events) +60(L2 Visualized metrics) +61(L2 Monitoring of costs) +62(L1 Simple application metrics) +63(L1 Simple system metrics) +64(L3 Advanced availability and stability metrics) +65(L3 Deactivation of unused metrics) +66(L3 Targeted alerting) +67(L4 Advanced app. metrics) +68(L4 Coverage and control metrics) +69(L4 Defense metrics) +70(L3 Filter outgoing traffic) +71(L4 Screens with metric visualization) +72(L3 Grouping of metrics) +73(L5 Metrics are combined with tests) +74(L2 Patching mean time to resolution via PR) +75(L3 Generation of response statistics) +76(L3 Usage of a vulnerability management system) +77(L4 Patching mean time to resolution via production) +78(L2 Artifact-based false positive treatment) +79(L1 Simple false positive treatment) +80(L3 Fix based on accessibility) +81(L1 Treatment of defects with high or critical severity) +82(L3 Global false positive treatment) +83(L2 Exploit likelihood estimation) +84(L3 Office Hours) +85(L2 Coverage of client side dynamic components) +86(L2 Usage of different roles) +87(L2 Simple Scan) +88(L3 Coverage of hidden endpoints) +89(L3 Coverage of more input vectors) +90(L3 Coverage of sequential operations) +91(L4 Usage of multiple scanners) +92(L5 Coverage of service to service communication) +93(L2 Test for exposed services) +94(L2 Isolated networks for virtual environments) +95(L2 Test network segmentation) +96(L3 Test for unauthorized installation) +97(L2 Evaluation of the trust of used components) +98(L2 Software Composition Analysis server side) +99(L2 Test for Time to Patch) +100(L2 Test libyear) +101(L3 API design validation) +102(L3 Software Composition Analysis client side) +103(L3 Static analysis for important client side components) +104(L3 Static analysis for important server side components) +105(L3 Test for Patch Deployment Time) +106(L4 Static analysis for all self written components) +107(L4 Usage of multiple analyzers) +108(L5 Dead code elimination) +109(L5 Exclusion of source code duplicates) +110(L5 Static analysis for all components/libraries) +111(L4 Correlate known vulnerabilities in infrastructure with new image versions) +112(L2 Usage of a maximum lifetime for images) +113(L4 Test of infrastructure components for known vulnerabilities) + + +1 --> 0 +1 --> 2 +1 --> 3 +1 --> 4 +1 --> 5 +1 --> 6 +1 --> 15 +1 --> 49 +1 --> 87 +1 --> 98 +1 --> 100 +1 --> 102 +1 --> 103 +1 --> 104 +1 --> 105 +1 --> 108 +1 --> 109 +0 --> 4 +6 --> 5 +6 --> 39 +6 --> 42 +7 --> 6 +5 --> 8 +5 --> 9 +5 --> 13 +5 --> 14 +5 --> 52 +5 --> 18 +8 --> 9 +8 --> 29 +8 --> 80 +8 --> 98 +8 --> 101 +8 --> 102 +8 --> 103 +8 --> 104 +8 --> 106 +8 --> 110 +11 --> 10 +9 --> 12 +2 --> 12 +15 --> 16 +18 --> 17 +20 --> 19 +20 --> 74 +20 --> 77 +20 --> 99 +20 --> 105 +19 --> 21 +23 --> 22 +23 --> 24 +23 --> 25 +24 --> 22 +24 --> 25 +22 --> 26 +28 --> 27 +28 --> 76 +31 --> 30 +30 --> 32 +32 --> 33 +33 --> 34 +36 --> 35 +36 --> 37 +36 --> 38 +41 --> 40 +44 --> 43 +46 --> 45 +46 --> 52 +48 --> 47 +51 --> 50 +50 --> 53 +53 --> 54 +56 --> 55 +56 --> 59 +56 --> 66 +58 --> 57 +55 --> 57 +57 --> 59 +60 --> 56 +60 --> 64 +60 --> 48 +60 --> 65 +60 --> 67 +60 --> 68 +60 --> 69 +62 --> 61 +62 --> 60 +62 --> 64 +62 --> 67 +63 --> 61 +63 --> 60 +70 --> 69 +72 --> 71 +72 --> 73 +76 --> 75 +76 --> 82 +74 --> 77 +79 --> 78 +81 --> 80 +78 --> 82 +83 --> 76 +83 --> 102 +84 --> 76 +86 --> 85 +86 --> 88 +86 --> 89 +86 --> 90 +86 --> 91 +87 --> 86 +87 --> 92 +94 --> 93 +94 --> 95 +97 --> 96 +98 --> 83 +98 --> 107 +103 --> 106 +103 --> 110 +104 --> 106 +104 --> 110 +102 --> 107 +106 --> 107 +112 --> 111 +112 --> 113 + +O --> 1 +O --> 7 +O --> 11 +O --> 20 +O --> 23 +O --> 28 +O --> 31 +O --> 36 +O --> 41 +O --> 44 +O --> 46 +O --> 51 +O --> 58 +O --> 62 +O --> 63 +O --> 70 +O --> 72 +O --> 79 +O --> 81 +O --> 84 +O --> 94 +O --> 97 +O --> 112 +``` diff --git a/generated/model.yaml b/generated/model.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..53ab713 --- /dev/null +++ b/generated/model.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,8505 @@ +--- +meta: + version: 4.3.1 + released: "2026-06-05" + publisher: https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel-data +--- +Build and Deployment: + Build: + Defined build process: + uuid: f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b + description: | + A *build process* includes more than just compiling your source code. It also covers: + - Managing (third party) dependencies + - Environment configuration + - Running unit and integration tests + - Security scanning and compliance checks + - Artifact creation and storage + - Deployment preparation + + Basing the build process on human memory may lead to inconsistencies and security misconfigurations. + + A *defined build process* can automate these steps to ensure consistency, avoiding accidental omissions or misconfigurations. Use tools such as Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or Maven to codify the process. + + A simplified, but still a *defined build process*, may be a checklist of the steps to be performed. + risk: Without a defined and automated build process the risk increase for accidental + mistakes, forgetting test activities, and insecure misconfigurations. + measure: Find a tool that suits your environment. Add your manual build steps, + include steps for running tests, scanning and preparation for deployment. + assessment: | + - Show your build pipeline configuration (e.g., Jenkinsfile, GitHub Actions workflow) and an exemplary job (build + test + security scan). + level: 1 + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 3 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + implementation: + - uuid: 42ddb49f-48f2-4a3a-b76a-e73104ac6971 + name: Jenkins + tags: [] + url: https://www.jenkins.io/ + - uuid: eb6de6b9-e060-4902-ae6f-604ffc386b63 + name: Maven + tags: [] + url: https://maven.apache.org/ + - uuid: b4bfead3-5fb6-4dd0-ba44-5da713bd22e4 + name: CI/CD tools + tags: + - ci-cd + url: https://martinfowler.com/articles/continuousIntegration.html + description: CI/CD tools such as jenkins, gitlab-ci or github-actions + - uuid: ed6b6340-6c7f-4e13-8937-f560d3f5db11 + name: Container technologies and orchestration like Docker, Kubernetes + tags: [] + url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/dao/artifact/d3f:ContainerOrchestrationSoftware/ + references: + samm2: + - I-SB-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.1.1 + - 14.2.2 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.37 + - 8.32 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Build/subsection/Defined%20build%20process + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Building and testing of artifacts in virtual environments: + uuid: a340f46b-6360-4cb8-847b-a0d3483d09d3 + description: |- + While building and testing artifacts, third party systems, application frameworks + and 3rd party libraries are used. These might be malicious as a result of + vulnerable libraries or because they are altered during the delivery phase. + risk: |- + While building and testing artifacts, third party systems, application frameworks + and 3rd party libraries are used. These might be malicious as a result of + vulnerable libraries or because they are altered during the delivery phase. + measure: Each step during within the build and testing phase is performed in + a separate virtual environments, which is destroyed afterward. + meta: + implementationGuide: Depending on your environment, usage of virtual machines + or container technology is a good way. After the build, the filesystem should + not be used again in other builds. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 2 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: b4bfead3-5fb6-4dd0-ba44-5da713bd22e4 + name: CI/CD tools + tags: + - ci-cd + url: https://martinfowler.com/articles/continuousIntegration.html + description: CI/CD tools such as jenkins, gitlab-ci or github-actions + - uuid: ed6b6340-6c7f-4e13-8937-f560d3f5db11 + name: Container technologies and orchestration like Docker, Kubernetes + tags: [] + url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/dao/artifact/d3f:ContainerOrchestrationSoftware/ + references: + samm2: + - I-SB-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 14.2.6 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.31 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Build/subsection/Building%20and%20testing%20of%20artifacts%20in%20virtual%20environments + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Pinning of artifacts: + uuid: f3c4971e-9f4d-4e59-8ed0-f0bdb6262477 + risk: Unauthorized manipulation of artifacts might be difficult to spot. For + example, this may result in using images with malicious code. Also, intended + major changes, which are automatically used in an image used might break the + functionality. + measure: Pinning of artifacts ensure that changes are performed only when intended. + comment: The usage of pinning requires a good processes for patching. Therefore, + choose this activity wisely. + meta: + implementationGuide: Pinning artifacts in Dockerfile refers to the practice + of using specific, immutable versions of base images and dependencies in + your build process. Instead of using the latest tag for your base image, + select a specific version or digest. For example, replace FROM node:latest, + to FROM node@sha256:abcdef12. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + tags: + - inventory + implementation: + - uuid: 9368abfb-cf37-477a-9091-a804d2de9148 + name: Signing of containers + tags: + - signing + - container + - build + url: https://www.aquasec.com/cloud-native-academy/supply-chain-security/container-image-signing/ + description: Container technology automatically creates a hash for images, + which can be used. + - uuid: 638b3691-c9a5-45fa-9ba8-e40aeea32766 + name: Immutable images + tags: + - deployment + - container + - build + url: https://kubernetes.io/blog/2022/09/29/enforce-immutability-using-cel/#immutablility-after-first-modification + description: Immutable images are an other way, e.g. by using a registry, + which doesn't allow overriding of images. + dependsOn: + - f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b # Defined build process + references: + samm2: + - I-SB-B-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 14.2.6 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.31 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Build/subsection/Pinning%20of%20artifacts + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + SBOM of components: + uuid: 2858ac12-0179-40d9-9acf-1b839c030473 + description: |- + SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) is a document that lists all components, libraries, + and dependencies used in a software application or container image. Creating an SBOM + during the build process can help ensure transparency, security, and license compliance + for your application. + risk: In case a vulnerability of severity high or critical exists, it needs + to be known where an artifacts with that vulnerability is deployed with which + dependencies. + measure: Creation of an SBOM of components (e.g. application and container image + content) during build. + dependsOn: + - f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b # Defined build process + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 3 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: 7f500e95-2110-44c4-a1f8-cd7ef5d9eb6b + name: Trivy + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy + - uuid: 7543a6f2-3850-47a9-bb2f-0987e2af6f6a + name: Syft + tags: + - sbom + - dependency + url: https://github.com/anchore/syft + references: + samm2: + - I-SB-B-1 + - D-TA-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 8.1 + - 8.2 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.9 + - 5.12 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Build/subsection/SBOM%20of%20components + isImplemented: false + tags: + - inventory + - scanning + - sca + evidence: "" + comments: "" + Signing of code: + uuid: 9f107927-61e9-4574-85ad-3f2b4bca8665 + risk: Execution or usage of malicious code or data e.g. via executables, libraries + or container images. + measure: Digitally signing commits helps to prevent unauthorized manipulation + of source code. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: d6d755d3-b9f1-4942-a084-e62b266541df + name: Signing of commits + tags: + - signing + url: https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Signing-Your-Work + description: Signing of commits in git + - uuid: 86c6bdba-73c0-4c99-bbda-81b85c9fe2a4 + name: Enforcement of commit signing + tags: + - signing + url: https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-protected-branches/managing-a-branch-protection-rule + description: Usage of branch protection rules + dependsOn: + - f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b # Defined build process + references: + samm2: + - I-SB-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 14.2.6 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.31 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Build/subsection/Signing%20of%20code + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Signing of artifacts: + uuid: 5786959d-0c6f-46a6-8e1c-a32ff1a50222 + risk: Execution or usage of malicious code or data e.g. via executables, libraries + or container images. + measure: Digitally signing artifacts for all steps during the build and especially + docker images, helps to ensure their integrity and authenticity. + description: "To perform a push to a GitHub repository, you must be authenticated. + It's important to note that GitHub does not verify if the authenticated user's + email address matches the one in the commit.\nTo clearly identify the author + of a commit for reviewers, commit signing is recommended.\n\nGitHub actions + such as [semantic-release-action](https://github.com/cycjimmy/semantic-release-action) + do not automatically sign commits and may encounter issues as a result. \n\nTo + address this, you can refer to a working configuration example in the [workflow + folder](https://github.com/devsecopsmaturitymodel/DevSecOps-MaturityModel/blob/master/.github/workflows/main.yml) + of DSOMM, which demonstrates how to use semantic release action in conjunction + with [planetscale/ghcommit-action](https://github.com/planetscale/ghcommit-action).\nFor + added security, consider using [Fine-grained personal access tokens](https://github.blog/2022-10-18-introducing-fine-grained-personal-access-tokens-for-github/) + provided by your organization for a specific repository. Store the Personal + Access Token (PAT) as a secret in your project." + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + level: 5 + implementation: + - uuid: ee81f93f-8230-4cfb-a132-ae4ec61cb8e6 + name: Docker Content Trust + tags: [] + url: https://docs.docker.com/engine/security/trust/ + - uuid: 6e9d8c14-ba3b-4698-afc3-365b4ab6fb1f + name: in-toto + tags: [] + url: https://in-toto.github.io/ + dependsOn: + - f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b # Defined build process + - f3c4971e-9f4d-4e59-8ed0-f0bdb6262477 # Pinning of artifacts + references: + samm2: + - I-SB-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 14.2.6 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.31 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Build/subsection/Signing%20of%20artifacts + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Deployment: + Automated deployment process: + uuid: 67e1a9aa-9fbf-4ec5-a2de-400f01960c51 + description: | + An *automated deployment process* implements the defined deployment steps using automation tools, ensuring consistency, auditability, and minimizing the risk of human errors or unauthorized changes. + risk: Deployments relying on manual routines increase the risk of errors, insecure + configurations, or deploying malfunctioning artifacts. + measure: Automating the deployment process enforces predefined criteria for + security, compliance, and performance, ensuring reliable artifact delivery. + assessment: | + - Deployment process is documented and available to relevant staff + - All deployment steps are automated + - Provide audit logs or evidence of deployments + level: 1 + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + dependsOn: + - f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b # Defined build process + - 74938a3f-1269-49b9-9d0f-c43a79a1985a # Defined deployment process + implementation: + - uuid: b4bfead3-5fb6-4dd0-ba44-5da713bd22e4 + name: CI/CD tools + tags: + - ci-cd + url: https://martinfowler.com/articles/continuousIntegration.html + description: CI/CD tools such as jenkins, gitlab-ci or github-actions + - uuid: 42ddb49f-48f2-4a3a-b76a-e73104ac6971 + name: Jenkins + tags: [] + url: https://www.jenkins.io/ + - uuid: cc47b2e3-6ee5-4926-af3a-d418ef91c8ba + name: Docker + url: https://github.com/moby/moby + tags: [] + references: + samm2: + - I-SD-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.1.1 + - 14.2.2 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.37 + - 8.32 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Deployment/subsection/Automated%20deployment%20process + tags: + - none + Defined deployment process: + uuid: 74938a3f-1269-49b9-9d0f-c43a79a1985a + description: | + A *defined deployment process* is a documented and standardized procedure for releasing software into production, ensuring consistency and reducing the risk of errors. + risk: Deployments relying on human memory are prone to errors, making experienced + long-ter staff critical. + measure: Establish a written deployment process documented in README files, + wikis, or implemented as executable scripts and automated steps. + assessment: | + - Deployment process is documented and available to relevant staff + - Logs of deployments are documented and availabe to relevant staff + level: 1 + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 1 + dependsOn: + - f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b # Defined build process + - 066084c6-1135-4635-9cc5-9e75c7c5459f # Version control + implementation: ~ + references: + samm2: + - I-SD-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.1.1 + - 14.2.2 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.37 + - 8.32 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Deployment/subsection/Defined%20deployment%20process + tags: + - none + Inventory of production components: + uuid: 2a44b708-734f-4463-b0cb-86dc46344b2f + description: | + An inventory of production components is a complete, up-to-date list of all applications running in production. This enables effective vulnerability management, incident response, and compliance. Without it, organizations risk running unmaintained or unauthorized software. + risk: An organization is unaware of components like applications in production. + Not knowing existing applications in production leads to not assessing it. + measure: |- + A documented inventory of components in production exists (gathered manually or automatically). For example a manually created document with applications in production. + In a kubernetes cluster, namespaces can be automatically gathered and documented, e.g. in a JSON in a S3 bucket/git repository, dependency track. + assessment: | + - Inventory of all production applications with application name, owner, and date of last review + - Inventory is accessible to development, security and operations teams + dependsOn: + - 67e1a9aa-9fbf-4ec5-a2de-400f01960c51 # Automated deployment process + level: 1 + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + implementation: + - uuid: 2210e02b-a856-4da4-8732-5acd77e20fca + name: Backstage + tags: + - documentation + - inventory + url: https://github.com/backstage/backstage + description: | + Backstage is an open-source platform designed to create developer portals. At its core is a centralized software catalog that brings organization to your microservices and infrastructure. + - uuid: 500399bd-7dfc-47fd-99d8-b55cefb760a9 + name: Dependency-Track + description: | + Dependency-Track is an intelligent Component Analysis platform that allows organizations to identify and reduce risk in the software supply chain. Dependency-Track takes a unique and highly beneficial approach by leveraging the capabilities of Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). + url: https://github.com/DependencyTrack/dependency-track + tags: + - sca + - inventory + - OpenSource + - Supply Chain + - vulnerability + - inventory + - uuid: 879bd03f-8de1-43d6-b492-d974181bfa6c + name: Image Metadata Collector + tags: + - documentation + - inventory + - kubernetes + url: https://github.com/SDA-SE/image-metadata-collector/ + description: | + Collects namespaces and namespaces including responsible team and contact info through annotations/labels from Kubernetes clusters. Results are available in JSON and can be uploaded to S3, github and an API. + references: + samm2: + - I-SB-B-1 + - D-TA-B-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 8.1 + - 8.2 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.9 + - 5.12 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Deployment/subsection/Inventory%20of%20production%20components + tags: + - inventory + Defined decommissioning process: + uuid: da4ff665-dcb9-4e93-9d20-48cdedc50fc2 + description: |- + The decommissioning process in the context of Docker and Kubernetes involves + retiring Docker containers, images, and Kubernetes resources that are no longer + needed or have been replaced. This process must be carefully executed to avoid + impacting other services and applications. + risk: Unused applications are not maintained and may contain vulnerabilities. + Once exploited they can be used to attack other applications or to perform + lateral movements within the organization. + measure: A clear decommissioning process ensures the removal of unused applications + from the `Inventory of production components` and if implemented from `Inventory + of production artifacts`. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 2 + level: 2 + references: + samm2: + - O-OM-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 11.2.7 + iso27001-2022: + - 7.14 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Deployment/subsection/Defined%20decommissioning%20process + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Environment depending configuration parameters (secrets): + uuid: df428c9d-efa0-4226-9f47-a15bb53f822b + risk: Unauthorized access to secrets stored in source code or in artifacts (e.g. + container images) through process listing (e.g. ps -ef). + measure: Set configuration parameters via environment variables stored using + specific platform functionalities or secrets management systems (e.g. Kubernetes + secrets or Hashicorp Vault). + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: e3a2ffc8-313f-437e-9663-b24591568209 + name: Hashicorp Vault + tags: + - authentication + - authorization + - secrets + - infrastructure + url: https://github.com/hashicorp/vault + description: | + A tool for secrets management, encryption as a service, and privileged access management. + references: + samm2: + - I-SD-B-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 9.4.5 + - 14.2.6 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.4 + - 8.31 + d3f: + - ApplicationConfigurationHardening + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Deployment/subsection/Environment%20depending%20configuration%20parameters%20%28secrets%29 + isImplemented: false + tags: + - secret + Evaluation of the trust of used components: + uuid: 0de465a6-55a7-4343-af79-948bb5ff10ba + risk: Application and system components like Open Source libraries or images + can have implementation flaws or deployment flaws. Developers or operations + might start random images in the production cluster which have malicious code + or known vulnerabilities. + measure: Each components source is evaluated to be trusted. For example the + source, number of developers included, email configuration used by maintainers + to prevent maintainer account theft, typo-squatting, ... Create image assessment + criteria, perform an evaluation of images and create a whitelist of artifacts/container + images/virtual machine images. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: 2a76300f-6b1f-4a51-b925-134c36b723af + name: Kubernetes Admission Controller can whitelist registries and/or whitelist + a signing key. + tags: [] + url: https://medium.com/slalom-technology/build-a-kubernetes-dynamic-admission-controller-for-container-registry-whitelisting-b46fe020e22d + test-url-expects: + - 403 + - uuid: 5d8b27ac-286e-47a5-b23f-769eb6d74e4a + name: packj + tags: + - OpenSource + - Supply Chain + - vulnerability + url: https://github.com/ossillate-inc/packj + description: | + Packj is a tool to detect software supply chain attacks. It can detect malicious, vulnerable, abandoned, typo-squatting, and other "risky" packages from popular open-source package registries, such as NPM, RubyGems, and PyPI. + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 14.2.1 + - 14.2.5 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.25 + - 8.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Deployment/subsection/Evaluation%20of%20the%20trust%20of%20used%20components + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Inventory of production artifacts: + uuid: 83057028-0b77-4d2e-8135-40969768ae88 + risk: In case a vulnerability of severity high or critical exists, it needs + to be known where an artifacts (e.g. container image) with that vulnerability + is deployed. + measure: A documented inventory of artifacts in production like container images + exists (gathered manually or automatically). + dependsOn: + - 67e1a9aa-9fbf-4ec5-a2de-400f01960c51 # Automated deployment process + - 2a44b708-734f-4463-b0cb-86dc46344b2f # Inventory of production components + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 3 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: 2210e02b-a856-4da4-8732-5acd77e20fca + name: Backstage + tags: + - documentation + - inventory + url: https://github.com/backstage/backstage + description: | + Backstage is an open-source platform designed to create developer portals. At its core is a centralized software catalog that brings organization to your microservices and infrastructure. + - uuid: 500399bd-7dfc-47fd-99d8-b55cefb760a9 + name: Dependency-Track + description: | + Dependency-Track is an intelligent Component Analysis platform that allows organizations to identify and reduce risk in the software supply chain. Dependency-Track takes a unique and highly beneficial approach by leveraging the capabilities of Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). + url: https://github.com/DependencyTrack/dependency-track + tags: + - sca + - inventory + - OpenSource + - Supply Chain + - vulnerability + - inventory + - uuid: 879bd03f-8de1-43d6-b492-d974181bfa6c + name: Image Metadata Collector + tags: + - documentation + - inventory + - kubernetes + url: https://github.com/SDA-SE/image-metadata-collector/ + description: | + Collects namespaces and namespaces including responsible team and contact info through annotations/labels from Kubernetes clusters. Results are available in JSON and can be uploaded to S3, github and an API. + references: + samm2: + - I-SB-B-1 + - D-TA-B-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 8.1 + - 8.2 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.9 + - 5.12 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Deployment/subsection/Inventory%20of%20production%20artifacts + tags: + - inventory + Handover of confidential parameters: + uuid: 94a96f79-8bd6-4904-97c0-994ff88f176a + risk: Parameters are often used to set credentials, for example by starting + containers or applications; these parameters can often be seen by any one + listing running processes on the target system. + measure: Encryption ensures confidentiality of credentials e.g. from unauthorized + access on the file system. Also, the usage of a credential management system + can help protect credentials. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 3 + implementation: "" + dependsOn: + - df428c9d-efa0-4226-9f47-a15bb53f822b # Environment depending configuration parameters (secrets) + references: + samm2: + - I-SD-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 14.1.3 + - 13.1.3 + - 9.4.3 + - 9.4.1 + - 10.1.2 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.33 + - 8.22 + - 5.17 + - 8.3 + - 8.24 + d3f: + - ApplicationConfigurationHardening + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Deployment/subsection/Handover%20of%20confidential%20parameters + isImplemented: false + tags: + - secret + Inventory of production dependencies: + uuid: 13e9757e-58e2-4277-bc0f-eadc674891e6 + risk: Delayed identification of components and their vulnerabilities in production. + In case a vulnerability is known by the organization, it needs to be known + where an artifacts with that vulnerability is deployed with which dependencies. + measure: A documented inventory of dependencies used in artifacts like container + images and containers exists. + dependsOn: + - 83057028-0b77-4d2e-8135-40969768ae88 # Inventory of production artifacts + - 2858ac12-0179-40d9-9acf-1b839c030473 # SBOM of components + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 3 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: 2210e02b-a856-4da4-8732-5acd77e20fca + name: Backstage + tags: + - documentation + - inventory + url: https://github.com/backstage/backstage + description: | + Backstage is an open-source platform designed to create developer portals. At its core is a centralized software catalog that brings organization to your microservices and infrastructure. + - uuid: 500399bd-7dfc-47fd-99d8-b55cefb760a9 + name: Dependency-Track + description: | + Dependency-Track is an intelligent Component Analysis platform that allows organizations to identify and reduce risk in the software supply chain. Dependency-Track takes a unique and highly beneficial approach by leveraging the capabilities of Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). + url: https://github.com/DependencyTrack/dependency-track + tags: + - sca + - inventory + - OpenSource + - Supply Chain + - vulnerability + - inventory + - uuid: 879bd03f-8de1-43d6-b492-d974181bfa6c + name: Image Metadata Collector + tags: + - documentation + - inventory + - kubernetes + url: https://github.com/SDA-SE/image-metadata-collector/ + description: | + Collects namespaces and namespaces including responsible team and contact info through annotations/labels from Kubernetes clusters. Results are available in JSON and can be uploaded to S3, github and an API. + references: + samm2: + - I-SB-B-3 + - I-SB-B-2 + - I-SB-B-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 8.1 + - 8.2 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.9 + - 5.12 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Deployment/subsection/Inventory%20of%20production%20dependencies + comments: "" + tags: + - inventory + - sbom + - scanning + - sca + Rolling update on deployment: + uuid: 85d52588-f542-4225-a338-20dc22a5508d + risk: While a deployment is performed, the application can not be reached. + measure: A deployment without downtime is performed*. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 2 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: cc47b2e3-6ee5-4926-af3a-d418ef91c8ba + name: Docker + url: https://github.com/moby/moby + tags: [] + - uuid: a71ce8f8-fd4a-4240-8b46-64a6cdb5dfdb + name: Webserver + tags: [] + url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/dao/artifact/d3f:WebServer/ + - uuid: ee2eb94b-7204-40d8-97da-43c7b1296e2e + name: rolling update + tags: [] + dependsOn: + - 67e1a9aa-9fbf-4ec5-a2de-400f01960c51 # Automated deployment process + references: + samm2: + - I-SD-A-2 + - I-SD-A-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.5.1 + - 14.2.2 + - 17.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.19 + - 8.32 + - 8.14 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Deployment/subsection/Rolling%20update%20on%20deployment + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Canary deployment: + uuid: c4204a32-2545-4424-b524-d1cc52b46abd + description: |- + A *canary deployment* gradually shifts a small fraction of production + traffic to a new artifact version while monitoring service-level + indicators and security signals. If error rates, latency, or security + scanners (such as DAST probes against the canary fleet) report + anomalies, traffic is rolled back automatically before the new + version reaches the broader production population. + + Compared to *Blue/Green Deployment*, canary requires only a small + delta in infrastructure cost (commonly 5-10% additional capacity + rather than a doubled environment) but demands more sophisticated + traffic-control infrastructure such as a service mesh, an + application load balancer with weighted routing, or a feature-flag + platform. + risk: |- + A new artifact version can introduce regressions or security + issues. Promoting it to 100% of production traffic in one step + exposes the entire user population to those issues before they + can be detected. + measure: |- + Adopt a canary deployment strategy in which a small percentage of + production traffic (commonly 1-10%) is routed to the new artifact + version for a defined observation window. Promotion to higher + traffic percentages is gated on automated SLI checks (error rate, + latency, saturation) and security checks (DAST, runtime anomaly + detection). Rollback must be automated and triggered by gate + failure without human intervention. + assessment: | + - Canary stage exists in the deployment pipeline with a configured + initial traffic percentage and observation window. + - Automated promotion and rollback gates are defined based on SLIs + and security signals. + - Audit logs of canary deployments and their promotion or rollback + decisions are retained. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 4 + implementation: + - uuid: cd49f792-a158-4b93-ac55-fd773954b217 + name: Canary release + tags: [] + url: https://martinfowler.com/bliki/CanaryRelease.html + dependsOn: + - 67e1a9aa-9fbf-4ec5-a2de-400f01960c51 # Automated deployment process + references: + samm2: + - I-SD-A-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.1.2 + - 12.5.1 + - 14.2.2 + - 14.2.9 + - 17.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.14 + - 8.19 + - 8.29 + - 8.31 + - 8.32 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Deployment/subsection/Canary%20deployment + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Same artifact for environments: + uuid: a854b48d-83bd-4f8d-8621-a0bdd470837f + risk: Building of an artifact for different environments means that an untested + artifact might reach the production environment. + measure: Building an artifact once and deploying it to different environments + means that only tested artifacts are allowed to reach the production environment + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 4 + implementation: + - uuid: cc47b2e3-6ee5-4926-af3a-d418ef91c8ba + name: Docker + url: https://github.com/moby/moby + tags: [] + dependsOn: + - f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b # Defined build process + references: + samm2: + - I-SD-A-2 + - I-SD-A-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 14.3.1 + - 14.2.8 + - 12.1.4 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.33 + - 8.29 + - 8.31 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Deployment/subsection/Same%20artifact%20for%20environments + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Usage of feature toggles: + uuid: a511799b-045e-4b96-9843-7d63d8c1e2ad + risk: Using environment variables to enable or disable features can lead to + a situation where a feature is accidentally enabled in the production environment. + measure: Usage of environment independent configuration parameter, called static + feature toggles, mitigates the risk of accidentally enabling insecure features + in production. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 2 + level: 4 + implementation: + - uuid: cc47b2e3-6ee5-4926-af3a-d418ef91c8ba + name: Docker + url: https://github.com/moby/moby + tags: [] + - uuid: 83be6c60-6633-4c32-98de-7ae065c143c9 + name: Feature Toggles + tags: + - development + - architecture + url: https://martinfowler.com/articles/feature-toggles.html + description: | + Feature Toggles are a powerful technique, allowing teams to modify system behavior without changing code. (Pete Hodgson) + dependsOn: + - a854b48d-83bd-4f8d-8621-a0bdd470837f # Same artifact for environments + references: + samm2: + - I-SD-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 14.3.1 + - 14.2.8 + - 14.2.9 + - 12.1.4 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.33 + - 8.29 + - 8.31 + d3f: + - ApplicationConfigurationHardening + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Deployment/subsection/Usage%20of%20feature%20toggles + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Blue/Green Deployment: + uuid: 0cb2626b-fb0d-4a0f-9688-57f787310d97 + risk: A new artifact's version can have unknown defects. + measure: |- + Using a blue/green deployment strategy increases application availability + and reduces deployment risk by simplifying the rollback process if a deployment fails. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 2 + level: 5 + implementation: + - uuid: 4fb3d95c-07c0-4cbb-b396-5054aba751c2 + name: Blue/Green Deployments + tags: [] + url: https://martinfowler.com/bliki/BlueGreenDeployment.html + dependsOn: + - 73aaae0b-5d68-4953-9fa4-fd25bf665f2a # Smoke Test + references: + samm2: + - I-SD-A-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 17.2.1 + - 12.1.1 + - 12.1.2 + - 12.1.4 + - 12.5.1 + - 14.2.9 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.14 + - 5.37 + - 8.31 + - 8.32 + - 8.19 + - 8.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Deployment/subsection/Blue%2FGreen%20Deployment + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Patch Management: + A patch policy is defined: + uuid: 99415139-6b50-441b-89e1-0aa59accd43d + description: | + A patch policy defines how and when software components, images, and dependencies are updated. A patch policy ensures that all these artifacts are regularly reviewed and updated, reducing the window of exposure to known threats. The policy should specify the frequency, responsibilities, and documentation requirements for patching. + risk: Vulnerabilities in running artifacts may persist for a long time and might + be exploited. + measure: Define a patch policy for all artifacts (e.g. in images) is defined. + How often is an image rebuilt? + assessment: | + - Patch policy is documented and accessible to relevant staff. + - The policy defines patch frequency and responsible roles. + - Patch actions and exceptions are logged and reviewed. + - Evidence of regular patching and policy review is available. + level: 1 + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 1 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-B-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + - 12.5.1 + - 14.2.5 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + - 8.19 + - 8.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Patch%20Management/subsection/A%20patch%20policy%20is%20defined + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - patching + Automated PRs for patches: + uuid: 8ae0b92c-10e0-4602-ba22-7524d6aed488 + description: | + Automated PRs for patches ensure that updates for outdated or vulnerable dependencies are created and proposed without manual intervention. Tools continuously monitor for new versions or security advisories and immediately generate pull requests to update affected components in code, container images, or infrastructure. This process ensures that available patches are quickly visible to developers and can be reviewed and merged with minimal delay, reducing the risk window for known vulnerabilities. + risk: | + Components with known vulnerabilities might persist for a long time and be exploited, even when a patch is available. + measure: | + Fast patching of third-party components is needed. The DevOps way is to have an automated pull request for new components. This includes: + * Applications + * Virtualized operating system components (e.g., container images) + * Operating systems + * Infrastructure as Code/GitOps (e.g., ArgoCD based on a git repository or Terraform) + assessment: | + - Automated PR tooling is enabled for all relevant repositories. + - PRs are created automatically for outdated or vulnerable dependencies. + - PRs are reviewed and merged according to the defined patch policy. + - Evidence of automated PRs and patching activity is available. + level: 1 + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + implementation: + - uuid: d6292c7d-aab7-43d3-a7c6-1e443b5c1aa4 + name: dependabot + tags: + - auto-pr + - patching + url: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/getting-started/dependabot-quickstart-guide + - uuid: 42ddb49f-48f2-4a3a-b76a-e73104ac6971 + name: Jenkins + tags: [] + url: https://www.jenkins.io/ + - uuid: 0d63f907-37fe-4375-88a5-a5e252732618 + name: terraform + tags: + - IaC + url: https://www.terraform.io/ + test-url-expects: + - 308 + description: | + Terraform enables infrastructure automation for provisioning, compliance, and management of any cloud, datacenter, and service. + - uuid: 8228266e-e04f-40ba-94c8-bfadc5310920 + name: renovate + tags: + - auto-pr + - patching + url: https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-B-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + - 14.2.5 + iso27001-2022: + - "8.8" + - "8.27" + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Patch%20Management/subsection/Automated%20PRs%20for%20patches + comments: "" + tags: + - patching + Automated merge of automated PRs: + uuid: f2594f8f-1cd6-45f9-af29-eaf3315698eb + description: Automated merges of automated created PRs for outdated dependencies. + risk: Vulnerabilities in running artifacts stay for too long and might get exploited. + measure: | + A good practice is to merge trusted dependencies (e.g. spring boot) after a grace period like one week. + Often, patches, fixes and minor updates are automatically merged. Be aware that automated merging requires a high + automated test coverage. Enforcement of merging of pull requests after a grace period. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + dependsOn: + - 8ae0b92c-10e0-4602-ba22-7524d6aed488 # Automated PRs for patches + implementation: + - uuid: d6292c7d-aab7-43d3-a7c6-1e443b5c1aa4 + name: dependabot + tags: + - auto-pr + - patching + url: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/getting-started/dependabot-quickstart-guide + - uuid: 8228266e-e04f-40ba-94c8-bfadc5310920 + name: renovate + tags: + - auto-pr + - patching + url: https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Patch%20Management/subsection/Automated%20merge%20of%20automated%20PRs + comments: "" + tags: + - patching + Nightly build of images (base images): + uuid: 34869eaf-f2e1-4926-b0bd-28c43402f057 + description: |- + A base image is a pre-built image that serves as a starting point for building + new images or containers. These base images usually include an operating system, + necessary dependencies, libraries, and other components that are required to run + a specific application or service. Nightly builds of custom base images refer to + an automated process that occurs daily or on a scheduled basis, usually during + nighttime or off-peak hours, to create updated versions of custom base images. + risk: Vulnerabilities in running containers stay for too long and might get + exploited. + measure: Custom base images are getting build at least nightly. In case the + packages in the base image e.g. centos has changed, the build server + triggers the build of depending images. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Patch%20Management/subsection/Nightly%20build%20of%20images%20%28base%20images%29 + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - patching + Reduction of the attack surface: + uuid: 16e39c8f-5336-4001-88ed-a552d2447531 + description: |- + Distroless images are minimal, stripped-down base images that contain only the + essential components required to run your application. They do not include package + managers, shells, or any other tools that are commonly found in standard Linux + distributions. Using distroless images can help reduce the attack surface and + overall size of your container images. + risk: Components, dependencies, files or file access rights might have vulnerabilities, + but the they are not needed. + measure: Removal of unneeded components, dependencies, files or file access + rights. For container images the usage of distroless images is recommended. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: ef647044-b675-47d3-9720-3ebc144ef37b + name: Distroless + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/distroless + - uuid: be757cb3-63d6-4a63-9c4e-e10b746fd47a + name: Fedora CoreOS + tags: [] + url: https://fedoraproject.org/coreos/ + - uuid: a92c4f8f-a918-406a-b1e5-70acfc0477bd + name: Distroless or Alpine + tags: [] + url: https://itnext.io/which-container-images-to-use-distroless-or-alpine-96e3dab43a22 + test-url-expects: + - 403 + references: + samm2: + - I-SB-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - hardening is missing in ISO 27001 + - 14.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.25 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Patch%20Management/subsection/Reduction%20of%20the%20attack%20surface + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - patching + Usage of a maximum lifetime for images: + uuid: 485a3383-7f2e-4dba-bb84-479377070904 + description: |- + The maximum lifetime for a Docker container refers to the duration a container + should be allowed to run before it is considered outdated, stale, or insecure. + There is not a fixed, universally applicable maximum lifetime for a Docker + container, as it varies depending on the specific use case, application + requirements, and security needs. As a best practice, it is essential to define + a reasonable maximum lifetime for containers to ensure that you consistently + deploy the most recent, patched, and secure versions of both your custom base + images and third-party images. + risk: Vulnerabilities in images of running containers stay for too long and + might get exploited. Long running containers have potential memory leaks. + A compromised container might get killed by restarting the container (e.g. + in case the attacker has not reached the persistence layer). + measure: A short maximum lifetime for images is defined, e.g. 30 days. The project + images, based on the nightly builded images, are deployed at leased once within + the defined lifetime. Third Party images are deployed at leased once within + the defined lifetime. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 4 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-B-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Patch%20Management/subsection/Usage%20of%20a%20maximum%20lifetime%20for%20images + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - patching + Automated deployment of automated PRs: + uuid: 08f27c26-2c6a-47fe-9458-5e88f188085d + risk: Even if automated dependencies PRs are merged, they might not be deployed. + This results in vulnerabilities in running artifacts stay for too long and + might get exploited. + measure: | + After merging of an automated dependency PR, automated deployment is needed, + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + dependsOn: + - f2594f8f-1cd6-45f9-af29-eaf3315698eb # Automated merge of automated PRs + implementation: + - uuid: 0d63f907-37fe-4375-88a5-a5e252732618 + name: terraform + tags: + - IaC + url: https://www.terraform.io/ + test-url-expects: + - 308 + description: | + Terraform enables infrastructure automation for provisioning, compliance, and management of any cloud, datacenter, and service. + - uuid: fdb0e7cc-d3dd-4a2b-9f45-7d403001294f + name: argoCD + tags: + - deployment + url: https://argo-cd.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ + references: + samm2: [] + iso27001-2017: [] + iso27001-2022: [] + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Patch%20Management/subsection/Automated%20deployment%20of%20automated%20PRs + tags: + - none + Usage of a short maximum lifetime for images: + uuid: 6b96e5a0-ce34-4ea4-a88f-469d3b84546e + description: |- + The maximum lifetime for a Docker container refers to the duration a container + should be allowed to run before it is considered outdated, stale, or insecure. + There is not a fixed, universally applicable maximum lifetime for a Docker + container, as it varies depending on the specific use case, application + requirements, and security needs. As a best practice, it is essential to define + a reasonable maximum lifetime for containers to ensure that you consistently + deploy the most recent, patched, and secure versions of both your custom base + images and third-party images. + risk: Vulnerabilities in running containers stay for too long and might get + exploited. + measure: | + A good practice is to perform the build and deployment daily or even just-in-time, when a new component (e.g. package) for the image is available. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 4 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 4 + implementation: + - uuid: 1a463242-b480-46f6-a912-b51ec1c1558d + name: Sample concept + tags: [] + description: "Sample concept: \n(1) each container has a set lifetime and + is killed / replaced with a new container multiple times a day where you + have some form of a graceful replacement to ensure no (short) service outage + will occur to the end users. \n(2) twice a day a rebuild of images is done. + The rebuilds are put into a automated testing pipeline. If the testing has + no blocking issues the new images will be released for deployment during + the next \"restart\" of a container. What has to be done, is to ensure the + new containers are deployed in some canary deployment manner, this will + ensure that if (and only if) something buggy has been introduced which breaks + functionality the canary deployment will make sure the \"older version\" + is being used and not the buggy newer one." + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Patch%20Management/subsection/Usage%20of%20a%20short%20maximum%20lifetime%20for%20images + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - patching +Culture and Organization: + Design: + Conduction of simple threat modeling on technical level: + uuid: 47419324-e263-415b-815d-e7161b6b905e + description: | + # OWASP SAMM Description + Threat modeling is a structured activity for identifying, evaluating, and managing system threats, architectural design flaws, and recommended security mitigations. It is typically done as part of the design phase or as part of a security assessment. + + Threat modeling is a team exercise, including product owners, architects, security champions, and security testers. At this maturity level, expose teams and stakeholders to threat modeling to increase security awareness and to create a shared vision on the security of the system. + + At maturity level 1, you perform threat modeling ad-hoc for high-risk applications and use simple threat checklists, such as STRIDE. Avoid lengthy workshops and overly detailed lists of low-relevant threats. Perform threat modeling iteratively to align to more iterative development paradigms. If you add new functionality to an existing application, look only into the newly added functions instead of trying to cover the entire scope. A good starting point is the existing diagrams that you annotate during discussion workshops. Always make sure to persist the outcome of a threat modeling discussion for later use. + + Your most important tool to start threat modeling is a whiteboard, smartboard, or a piece of paper. Aim for security awareness, a simple process, and actionable outcomes that you agree upon with your team. Once requirements are gathered and analysis is performed, implementation specifics need to be defined. The outcome of this stage is usually a diagram outlining data flows and a general system architecture. This presents an opportunity for both threat modeling and attaching security considerations to every ticket and epic that is the outcome of this stage. + + Source: https://owaspsamm.org/model/design/threat-assessment/stream-b/ + # OWASP Project Integration Description + There is some great advice on threat modeling out there *e.g.* [this](https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/07/how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-mostly-and-love-my-threat-model/) article or [this](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/securityengineering/sdl/threatmodeling) one. + + A bite sized primer by Adam Shostack himself can be found [here](https://adam.shostack.org/blog/2018/03/threat-modeling-panel-at-appsec-cali-2018/). + + OWASP includes a short [article](https://wiki.owasp.org/index.php/Category:Threat_Modeling) on Threat Modeling along with a relevant [Cheatsheet](https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Threat_Modeling_Cheat_Sheet.html). Moreover, if you're following OWASP SAMM, it has a short section on [Threat Assessment](https://owaspsamm.org/model/design/threat-assessment/). + + There's a few projects that can help with creating Threat Models at this stage, [PyTM](https://github.com/izar/pytm) is one, [ThreatSpec](https://github.com/threatspec/threatspec) is another. + + > Note: _A threat model can be as simple as a data flow diagram with attack vectors on every flow and asset and equivalent remediations. An example can be found below._ + + ![Threat Model](https://github.com/OWASP/www-project-integration-standards/raw/master/writeups/owasp_in_sdlc/images/threat_model.png "Threat Model") + + Last, if the organizations maps Features to Epics, the Security Knowledge Framework (SKF) can be used to facilitate this process by leveraging it's questionnaire function. + + ![SKF](https://github.com/OWASP/www-project-integration-standards/raw/master/writeups/owasp_in_sdlc/images/skf_qs.png "SKF") + + This practice has the side effect that it trains non-security specialists to think like attackers. + + The outcomes of this stage should help lay the foundation of secure design and considerations. + + **Example Low Maturity Scenario:** + + Following vague feature requirements the design includes caching data to a local unencrypted database with a hardcoded password. + + Remote data store access secrets are hardcoded in the configuration files. All communication between backend systems is plaintext. + + Frontend serves data over GraphQL as a thin layer between caching system and end user. + + GraphQL queries are dynamically translated to SQL, Elasticsearch and NoSQL queries. Access to data is protected with basic auth set to _1234:1234_ for development purposes. + + Source: OWASP Project Integration Project + risk: Technical related threats are discovered too late in the development and + deployment process. + measure: | + Perform threat modeling of technical features during product sprint planning using simple checklists and diagrams. Document identified threats and mitigations for new or changed functionality. + assessment: | + - Evidence of threat modeling activities exists for high-risk applications, including annotated diagrams and documented threats/mitigations. + - Activities are performed during sprint planning and involve relevant stakeholders. Outcomes are recorded and accessible for review. + level: 1 + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: c0533602-11b7-4838-93cc-a40556398163 + name: Whiteboard + tags: + - defender + - threat-modeling + - collaboration + - whiteboard + url: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiteboard + - uuid: 965c3814-b6df-4ead-a096-1ed78ce1c7c1 + name: Miro (or any other collaborative board) + tags: + - defender + - threat-modeling + - collaboration + - whiteboard + url: https://miro.com/ + - uuid: 088794c4-3424-40d4-9084-4151587fc84d + name: Draw.io + tags: + - defender + - threat-modeling + - whiteboard + url: https://github.com/jgraph/drawio-desktop + - uuid: fd0f282b-a065-4464-beed-770c604a5f52 + name: Threat Modeling Playbook + tags: + - owasp + - defender + - threat-modeling + - whiteboard + url: https://github.com/Toreon/threat-model-playbook + - uuid: b5eaf710-e05f-49e5-a649-13afde9aeb52 + name: OWASP SAMM + tags: + - threat-modeling + - owasp + - defender + url: https://owaspsamm.org/model/design/threat-assessment/stream-b/ + - uuid: 1c56dbea-e067-44e2-8d3b-0a1205a70617 + name: Threat Matrix for Storage + url: https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/security/blog/2021/04/08/threat-matrix-for-storage/ + tags: + - documentation + - storage + - cluster + - kubernetes + references: + samm2: + - D-TA-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 + - May be part of risk assessment + - 8.2.1 + - 14.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 + - May be part of risk assessment + - 5.12 + - 8.25 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Design/subsection/Conduction%20of%20simple%20threat%20modeling%20on%20technical%20level + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Information security targets are communicated: + uuid: 1b9281b9-48e2-4c01-9ac6-9db9931c4885 + risk: Employees don't know their organizations security targets. Therefore security + is not considered during development and administration as much as it should + be. + measure: Transparent and timely communication of the security targets by senior + management is essential to ensure teams' buy-in and support. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - G-SM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 5.1.1 + - 7.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.1 + - 5.4 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Design/subsection/Information%20security%20targets%20are%20communicated + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Conduction of simple threat modeling on business level: + uuid: 48f97f31-931c-46eb-9b3e-e2fec0cd0426 + risk: Business related threats are discovered too late in the development and + deployment process. + measure: Threat modeling of business functionality is performed during the product + backlog creation to facilitate early detection of security defects. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - D-TA-B-1 + - D-TA-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 + - May be part of risk assessment + - 8.2.1 + - 14.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 + - May be part of risk assessment + - 5.12 + - 8.25 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Design/subsection/Conduction%20of%20simple%20threat%20modeling%20on%20business%20level + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Creation of simple abuse stories: + uuid: bacf85b6-5bc0-405d-b5ba-a5d971467cc1 + risk: User stories mostly don't consider security implications. Security flaws + are discovered too late in the development and deployment process. + measure: Abuse stories are created during the creation of user stories. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: bb5b8988-021b-452a-a914-bd36887b6860 + name: Don't Forget EVIL User stories + tags: [] + url: https://medium.com/serious-scrum/evil-user-storys-story-telling-for-it-security-e4a9ec94193c + test-url-expects: + - 403 + description: Do not Forget _Evil_ User Stories and [Practical Security Stories + and Security Tasks for Agile Development Environments](https://safecode.org/publication/SAFECode_Agile_Dev_Security0712.pdf) + dependsOn: + - 47419324-e263-415b-815d-e7161b6b905e # Conduction of simple threat modeling on technical level + - dd5ed7c1-bdbf-400f-b75f-6d3953a1a04e # Creation of threat modeling processes and standards + references: + samm2: + - D-TA-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 + - May be part of project management + - 6.1.5 + - May be part of risk assessment + - 8.1.2 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 + - May be part of project management + - 5.8 + - May be part of risk assessment + - 5.9 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Design/subsection/Creation%20of%20simple%20abuse%20stories + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Creation of threat modeling processes and standards: + uuid: dd5ed7c1-bdbf-400f-b75f-6d3953a1a04e + risk: Inadequate identification of business and technical risks. + measure: Creation of threat modeling processes and standards through the organization + helps to enhance the security culture and provide more structure to the threat + model exercises. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 4 + time: 3 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + description: "" + implementation: + - uuid: fd0f282b-a065-4464-beed-770c604a5f52 + name: Threat Modeling Playbook + tags: + - owasp + - defender + - threat-modeling + - whiteboard + url: https://github.com/Toreon/threat-model-playbook + - uuid: b5eaf710-e05f-49e5-a649-13afde9aeb52 + name: OWASP SAMM + tags: + - threat-modeling + - owasp + - defender + url: https://owaspsamm.org/model/design/threat-assessment/stream-b/ + dependsOn: + - 47419324-e263-415b-815d-e7161b6b905e # Conduction of simple threat modeling on technical level + references: + samm2: + - D-TA-B-3 + - D-TA-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 + - May be part of risk assessment + - 8.2.1 + - 14.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 + - May be part of risk assessment + - 5.12 + - 8.25 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Design/subsection/Creation%20of%20threat%20modeling%20processes%20and%20standards + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Conduction of advanced threat modeling: + uuid: ae22dafd-bcd6-41ee-ba01-8b7fe6fc1ad9 + risk: Inadequate identification of business and technical risks. + measure: Threat modeling is performed by using reviewing user stories and producing + security driven data flow diagrams. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 4 + time: 3 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 4 + dependsOn: + - 47419324-e263-415b-815d-e7161b6b905e # Conduction of simple threat modeling on technical level + - dd5ed7c1-bdbf-400f-b75f-6d3953a1a04e # Creation of threat modeling processes and standards + description: | + **Example High Maturity Scenario:** + + Based on a detailed threat model defined and updated through code, the team decides the following: + + * Local encrypted caches need to expire and auto-purged. + * Communication channels encrypted and authenticated. + * All secrets persisted in shared secrets store. + * Frontend designed with permissions model integration. + * Permissions matrix defined. + * Input is escaped output is encoded appropriately using well established libraries. + + Source: OWASP Project Integration Project + implementation: + - uuid: c0533602-11b7-4838-93cc-a40556398163 + name: Whiteboard + tags: + - defender + - threat-modeling + - collaboration + - whiteboard + url: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whiteboard + - uuid: 965c3814-b6df-4ead-a096-1ed78ce1c7c1 + name: Miro (or any other collaborative board) + tags: + - defender + - threat-modeling + - collaboration + - whiteboard + url: https://miro.com/ + - uuid: 088794c4-3424-40d4-9084-4151587fc84d + name: Draw.io + tags: + - defender + - threat-modeling + - whiteboard + url: https://github.com/jgraph/drawio-desktop + - uuid: fd0f282b-a065-4464-beed-770c604a5f52 + name: Threat Modeling Playbook + tags: + - owasp + - defender + - threat-modeling + - whiteboard + url: https://github.com/Toreon/threat-model-playbook + - uuid: b5eaf710-e05f-49e5-a649-13afde9aeb52 + name: OWASP SAMM + tags: + - threat-modeling + - owasp + - defender + url: https://owaspsamm.org/model/design/threat-assessment/stream-b/ + - uuid: e8332407-5149-459e-a2fe-c5c78c7ec55c + name: Threagile + tags: + - threat-modeling + url: https://github.com/Threagile/threagile + - uuid: 1c56dbea-e067-44e2-8d3b-0a1205a70617 + name: Threat Matrix for Storage + url: https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/security/blog/2021/04/08/threat-matrix-for-storage/ + tags: + - documentation + - storage + - cluster + - kubernetes + references: + samm2: + - D-TA-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 + - May be part of risk assessment + - 8.2.1 + - 14.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 + - May be part of risk assessment + - 5.12 + - 8.25 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Design/subsection/Conduction%20of%20advanced%20threat%20modeling + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Creation of advanced abuse stories: + uuid: 0a929c3e-ab9a-4206-8761-adf84b74622e + risk: Simple user stories are not going deep enough. Relevant security considerations + are performed. Security flaws are discovered too late in the development and + deployment process + measure: Advanced abuse stories are created as part of threat modeling activities. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 4 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 5 + dependsOn: + - bacf85b6-5bc0-405d-b5ba-a5d971467cc1 # Creation of simple abuse stories + implementation: + - uuid: bb5b8988-021b-452a-a914-bd36887b6860 + name: Don't Forget EVIL User stories + tags: [] + url: https://medium.com/serious-scrum/evil-user-storys-story-telling-for-it-security-e4a9ec94193c + test-url-expects: + - 403 + description: Do not Forget _Evil_ User Stories and [Practical Security Stories + and Security Tasks for Agile Development Environments](https://safecode.org/publication/SAFECode_Agile_Dev_Security0712.pdf) + references: + samm2: + - D-TA-B-2 + - V-RT-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 + - May be part of project management + - 6.1.5 + - May be part of risk assessment + - 8.1.2 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 + - May be part of project management + - 5.8 + - May be part of risk assessment + - 5.9 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Design/subsection/Creation%20of%20advanced%20abuse%20stories + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Education and Guidance: + Ad-Hoc Security trainings for software developers: + uuid: 12c90cc6-3d58-4d9b-82ff-d469d2a0c298 + description: | + Ad-hoc security training provides basic awareness of software security risks and best practices to developers and other personnel involved in software development. These trainings are delivered as needed, without a fixed schedule, to address immediate knowledge gaps or respond to emerging threats. + risk: | + Without any security training, personnel may lack awareness of common software vulnerabilities (such as SQL Injection and vulnerable dependencies), increasing the risk of introducing exploitable flaws into applications. + measure: | + Provide security awareness training for all personnel involved in software development on an ad-hoc basis, ensuring that relevant topics are covered when new risks or needs are identified. + assessment: | + - Conduct security training for developers and relevant personnel + - Training materials are available + - Attendance records are available + level: 1 + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: 1fff917f-205e-4eab-ae0e-1fab8c04bf3a + name: OWASP Juice Shop + tags: + - training + url: https://github.com/juice-shop/juice-shop + description: In case you do not have the budget to hire an external security + expert, an option is to use the OWASP JuiceShop on a "hacking Friday" + - uuid: 1c3f2f7a-5031-4687-9d69-76c5178c74e1 + name: OWASP Cheatsheet Series + tags: + - training + - secure coding + url: https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/ + references: + samm2: + - G-EG-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 7.2.2 + iso27001-2022: + - 6.3 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Education%20and%20Guidance/subsection/Ad-Hoc%20Security%20trainings%20for%20software%20developers + tags: + - none + Security consulting on request: + uuid: 0b28367b-75a0-4bae-a926-3725c1bf9bb0 + level: 1 + description: | + Security consulting on request allows teams to seek expert advice on security-related questions or challenges as they arise. This support can be provided by internal or external security consultants and helps address specific concerns during software development. + risk: | + If teams do not consult security experts when questions arise, security flaws may be introduced or remain undetected, increasing the risk of vulnerabilities in the software. + measure: | + Make security consulting available to teams on request, ensuring that expert advice is accessible when needed to address security concerns during development. + assessment: | + - Show evidence that an it security expert is available for questions at least quarterly. + - Documentation of consultations and resulting actions is available for review. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: 1c3f2f7a-5031-4687-9d69-76c5178c74e1 + name: OWASP Cheatsheet Series + tags: + - training + - secure coding + url: https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/ + references: + samm2: + - G-EG-A-1 + - G-EG-B-1 + iso27001-2017: + - security consulting is missing in ISO 27001 may be + - 6.1.1 + - 6.1.4 + - 6.1.5 + iso27001-2022: + - Security consulting is missing in ISO 27001 may be + - 5.2 + - 5.6 + - 5.8 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Education%20and%20Guidance/subsection/Security%20consulting%20on%20request + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Each team has a security champion: + uuid: 6217fe11-5ed7-4cf4-9de4-555bcfa6fe87 + risk: No one feels directly responsible for security and the security champion + does not have enough time to allocate to each team. + measure: Each team defines an individual to be responsible for security. These + individuals are often referred to as 'security champions' + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 2 + description: | + Implement a program where each software development team has a member considered a "Security Champion" who is the liaison between Information Security and developers. Depending on the size and structure of the team the "Security Champion" may be a software developer, tester, or a product manager. The "Security Champion" has a set number of hours per week for Information Security related activities. They participate in periodic briefings to increase awareness and expertise in different security disciplines. "Security Champions" have additional training to help develop these roles as Software Security subject-matter experts. You may need to customize the way you create and support "Security Champions" for cultural reasons. + + The goals of the position are to increase effectiveness and efficiency of application security and compliance and to strengthen the relationship between various teams and Information Security. To achieve these objectives, "Security Champions" assist with researching, verifying, and prioritizing security and compliance related software defects. They are involved in all Risk Assessments, Threat Assessments, and Architectural Reviews to help identify opportunities to remediate security defects by making the architecture of the application more resilient and reducing the attack threat surface. + + [Source: OWASP SAMM](https://owaspsamm.org/model/governance/education-and-guidance/stream-b/) + implementation: + - uuid: c191a515-3c10-4903-a889-70c8021f2ea1 + name: OWASP Security Champions Playbook + tags: + - security champions + url: https://github.com/c0rdis/security-champions-playbook + references: + samm2: + - G-EG-B-1 + - G-EG-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Security champions are missing in ISO 27001 most likely + - 7.2.1 + - 7.2.2 + iso27001-2022: + - Security champions are missing in ISO 27001 most likely + - 5.4 + - 6.3 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Education%20and%20Guidance/subsection/Each%20team%20has%20a%20security%20champion + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Regular security training for all: + uuid: 9768f154-357a-4c06-af6f-d66570677c9b + risk: Understanding security is hard. + measure: Provide security awareness training for all internal personnel involved + in software development on a regular basis like twice in a year for 1-3 days. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 4 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + level: 2 + description: | + Conduct security awareness training for all roles currently involved in the management, development, testing, or auditing of the software. The goal is to increase the awareness of application security threats and risks, security best practices, and secure software design principles. Develop training internally or procure it externally. Ideally, deliver training in person so participants can have discussions as a team, but Computer-Based Training (CBT) is also an option. + + Course content should include a range of topics relevant to application security and privacy, while remaining accessible to a non-technical audience. Suitable concepts are secure design principles including Least Privilege, Defense-in-Depth, Fail Secure (Safe), Complete Mediation, Session Management, Open Design, and Psychological Acceptability. Additionally, the training should include references to any organization-wide standards, policies, and procedures defined to improve application security. The OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities should be covered at a high level. + + Training is mandatory for all employees and contractors involved with software development and includes an auditable sign-off to demonstrate compliance. Consider incorporating innovative ways of delivery (such as gamification) to maximize its effectiveness and combat desensitization. + + [Source: OWASP SAMM 2](https://owaspsamm.org/model/governance/education-and-guidance/stream-a/) + implementation: + - uuid: 1fff917f-205e-4eab-ae0e-1fab8c04bf3a + name: OWASP Juice Shop + tags: + - training + url: https://github.com/juice-shop/juice-shop + description: In case you do not have the budget to hire an external security + expert, an option is to use the OWASP JuiceShop on a "hacking Friday" + - uuid: 1c3f2f7a-5031-4687-9d69-76c5178c74e1 + name: OWASP Cheatsheet Series + tags: + - training + - secure coding + url: https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/ + references: + samm2: + - G-EG-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 7.2.2 + iso27001-2022: + - 6.3 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Education%20and%20Guidance/subsection/Regular%20security%20training%20for%20all + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Regular security training of security champions: + uuid: f88d1b17-3d7d-4c3d-8139-ad44fc4942d4 + risk: Understanding security is hard, even for security champions. + measure: Regular security training of security champions. + assessment: | + - Process Documentation: TODO + - Training Content: TOODO + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 4 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 5 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: 1c3f2f7a-5031-4687-9d69-76c5178c74e1 + name: OWASP Cheatsheet Series + tags: + - training + - secure coding + url: https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/ + dependsOn: + - 6217fe11-5ed7-4cf4-9de4-555bcfa6fe87 # Each team has a security champion + references: + samm2: + - D-TA-B-2 + - G-EG-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Security champions are missing in ISO 27001 + - 7.2.2 + iso27001-2022: + - Security champions are missing in ISO 27001 + - 6.3 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Education%20and%20Guidance/subsection/Regular%20security%20training%20of%20security%20champions + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Reward of good communication: + uuid: 91b6f75b-9f4a-4d77-95a2-af7ad3222c7c + risk: Employees are not getting excited about security. + measure: Good communication and transparency encourages cross-organizational + support. Gamification of security is also known to help, examples include + T-Shirts, mugs, cups, gift cards and 'High-Fives'. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: 8e1b4a8a-c53b-4b1e-90f6-c60b7e225098 + name: Motivate people + tags: + - security champions + - gamification + - nudging + url: https://github.com/wurstbrot/security-pins + description: |- + Enhance motivation can be performed with the distribution of pins + as a reward, see [OWASP Security Pins Project](https://github.com/wurstbrot/security-pins) + - uuid: 22b63bdb-2003-4ac0-969d-b1e5268c2510 + name: OWASP Top 10 Maturity Categories for Security Champions + tags: + - security champions + url: https://owaspsamm.org/presentations/OWASP_Top_10_Maturity_Categories_for_Security_Champions.pptx + references: + samm2: + - G-EG-B-1 + iso27001-2017: + - not required by ISO 27001 + - interestingly enough A7.2.3 is requiring a process to handle misconduct + but nothing to promote good behavior. + iso27001-2022: + - ISO 27001:2022 mapping is missing + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Education%20and%20Guidance/subsection/Reward%20of%20good%20communication + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Security code review: + uuid: 7121b0c7-6ace-4d6b-95d0-94535dbccb57 + risk: Understanding security is hard. + measure: | + The following areas of code tend to have a high-risk of containing security vulnerabilities: + - Crypto implementations / usage + - Parser, unparser + - System configuration + - Authentication, authorization + - Session management + - Request throttling + - :unicorn: (self-developed code, only used in that one software) + description: | + ### Benefits + - New vulnerabilities may be found before reaching production. + - Old vulnerabilities are found and fixed. + assessment: | + - Present the performed reviews (including participants, findings, consequences) and assess whether it is reasonable. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: c77f7ecd-76de-4611-bd6d-5b249f910c39 + name: CWE Top 25 Most Dangerous Software Weaknesses + tags: + - documentation + - threat + url: https://cwe.mitre.org/top25/archive/2020/2020_cwe_top25.html + credits: | + AppSecure-nrw [Security Belts](https://github.com/AppSecure-nrw/security-belts/) + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-B-1 + iso27001-2017: + - ISO 27001:2017 mapping is missing + iso27001-2022: + - ISO 27001:2022 mapping is missing + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Education%20and%20Guidance/subsection/Security%20code%20review + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Conduction of build-it, break-it, fix-it contests: + uuid: bfdb576e-a416-4ec6-96fe-a078d58b2ff8 + risk: Understanding security is hard, even for security champions and the conduction + of security training often focuses on breaking a component instead of building + a component secure. + measure: The build-it, break-it, fix-it contest allows to train people with + security related roles like security champions the build, break and fix part + of a secure application. This increases the learning of building secure components. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 5 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: 8d4c1849-f310-4c42-8148-2810b382bc6f + name: Build it Break it Fix it Contest + tags: [] + url: https://builditbreakit.org/ + references: + samm2: + - G-EG-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 7.2.2 + iso27001-2022: + - 6.3 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Education%20and%20Guidance/subsection/Conduction%20of%20build-it%2C%20break-it%2C%20fix-it%20contests + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Office Hours: + uuid: 185d5a74-19dc-4422-be07-44ea35226783 + risk: Developers and Operations are not in contact with the security team and + therefore do not ask prior implementation of (known or unknown) threats- + measure: As a security team, be open for questions and hints during defined + office hours. x x d + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + implementation: ~ + references: + samm2: + - G-EG-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 7.2.2 + iso27001-2022: + - 6.3 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Education%20and%20Guidance/subsection/Office%20Hours + tags: + - none + Security Coaching: + uuid: f7b215dc-73a4-4c61-9e49-b3a3af1c9ac3 + risk: Training does not change behaviour. Therefore, even if security practices + are understood, it's likely that they are not performed. + measure: By coaching teams on security topics using for example the samman coaching + method, teams internalize security practices as new habits in their development + process. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 4 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: 9223be73-00da-400e-a910-3871734cff2f + name: sammancoaching + tags: + - documentation + - coaching + - education + url: https://sammancoaching.org/ + description: | + Security coaches work with software development teams to help them adopt better security practices. + level: 3 + references: + samm2: + - G-EG-B-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 7.1.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 6.1 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Education%20and%20Guidance/subsection/Security%20Coaching + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Security-Lessoned-Learned: + uuid: 58c46807-fee9-448b-b6dd-8050c464ab52 + risk: After an incident, a similar incident might reoccur. + measure: Running a 'lessons learned' session after an incident helps drive continuous + improvement. Regular meetings with security champions are a good place to + share and discuss lessons learned. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - G-EG-B-3 + - O-IM-B-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 16.1.6 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Education%20and%20Guidance/subsection/Security-Lessoned-Learned + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Simple mob hacking: + uuid: 535f301a-e8e8-4eda-ad77-a08b035c92de + risk: Understanding security is hard. + measure: | + Participate with your whole team in a simple mob hacking session organized by the Security Champion Guild. + In the session the guild presents a vulnerable application and together you look at possible exploits. + Just like in mob programming there is one driver and several navigators. + description: | + ### Guidelines for your simple mob hacking session + - All exploits happen via the user interface. + - No need for security/hacking tools. + - No need for deep technical or security knowledge. + - Use an insecure training app, e.g., [DVWA](https://dvwa.co.uk/) or [OWASP Juice Shop](https://owasp.org/www-project-juice-shop/). + - Encourage active participation, e.g., use small groups. + - Allow enough time for everyone to run at least one exploit. + + ### Benefits + - The team gets an idea of how exploits can look like and how easy applications can be attacked. + - The team understands functional correct working software can be highly insecure and easy to exploit. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 5 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + credits: | + AppSecure-nrw [Security Belts](https://github.com/AppSecure-nrw/security-belts/) + implementation: + - uuid: 1fff917f-205e-4eab-ae0e-1fab8c04bf3a + name: OWASP Juice Shop + tags: + - training + url: https://github.com/juice-shop/juice-shop + description: In case you do not have the budget to hire an external security + expert, an option is to use the OWASP JuiceShop on a "hacking Friday" + - uuid: a8cd9acb-ad22-44d6-b177-1154c65a8529 + name: Damn Vulnerable Web Application + tags: + - training + description: Simple Application with intended vulnerabilities. HTML based. + references: + samm2: + - G-EG-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 7.2.2 + iso27001-2022: + - 6.3 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Education%20and%20Guidance/subsection/Simple%20mob%20hacking + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Aligning security in teams: + uuid: f994a55d-71bb-45a4-a887-0a213d72c504 + risk: The concept of Security Champions might suggest that only he/she is responsible + for security. However, everyone in the project team should be responsible + for security. + measure: By aligning security Subject Matter Experts with project teams, a higher + security standard can be achieved. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 4 + time: 4 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 5 + implementation: + - uuid: 8a044b74-17f2-4ffa-9dee-6b3bb6e4baf3 + name: Involve Security SME + tags: [] + description: Security SME are involved in discussion for requirements analysis, + software design and sprint planning to provide guidance and suggestions. + level: 4 + references: + samm2: + - G-EG-B-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 7.1.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 6.1 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Education%20and%20Guidance/subsection/Aligning%20security%20in%20teams + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Conduction of collaborative team security checks: + uuid: 35446784-7610-40d9-af9e-d43f3173bf8c + risk: Development teams limited insight over security practices. + measure: Mutual security testing the security of other teams project enhances + security awareness and knowledge. + difficultyOfImplementation: + resources: 2 + knowledge: 4 + time: 4 + usefulness: 2 + level: 4 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - G-EG-A-1 + - G-EG-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Mutual security testing is not explicitly required in ISO 27001 may be + - 7.2.2 + iso27001-2022: + - Mutual security testing is not explicitly required in ISO 27001 may be + - 6.3 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Education%20and%20Guidance/subsection/Conduction%20of%20collaborative%20team%20security%20checks + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Conduction of war games: + uuid: 534f60bf-0995-4314-bb9c-f0f2bf204694 + risk: Understanding incident response plans during an incident is hard and ineffective. + measure: War Games like activities help train for incidents. Security SMEs create + attack scenarios in a testing environment enabling the trainees to learn how + to react in case of an incident. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 4 + time: 5 + resources: 4 + usefulness: 3 + level: 4 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - G-EG-A-2 + - O-IM-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - War games are not explicitly required in ISO 27001 may be + - 7.2.2 + - 16.1 + - 16.1.5 + iso27001-2022: + - War games are not explicitly required in ISO 27001 may be + - 6.3 + - 5.24 + - 5.26 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Education%20and%20Guidance/subsection/Conduction%20of%20war%20games + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Regular security training for externals: + uuid: 31833d56-35af-4ef3-9300-f23d27646ce7 + risk: Understanding security is hard. + measure: Provide security awareness training for all personnel including externals + involved in software development on a regular basis. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 2 + resources: 3 + usefulness: 4 + level: 4 + implementation: + - uuid: 1fff917f-205e-4eab-ae0e-1fab8c04bf3a + name: OWASP Juice Shop + tags: + - training + url: https://github.com/juice-shop/juice-shop + description: In case you do not have the budget to hire an external security + expert, an option is to use the OWASP JuiceShop on a "hacking Friday" + - uuid: 1c3f2f7a-5031-4687-9d69-76c5178c74e1 + name: OWASP Cheatsheet Series + tags: + - training + - secure coding + url: https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/ + references: + samm2: + - G-EG-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 7.2.2 + iso27001-2022: + - 6.3 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Education%20and%20Guidance/subsection/Regular%20security%20training%20for%20externals + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Conduction of collaborative security checks with developers and system administrators: + uuid: 95caef96-36ed-458c-a087-5c35d4f9dec2 + risk: Security checks by external companies do not increase the understanding + of an application/system for internal employees. + measure: Periodically security reviews of source code (SCA), in which security + SME, developers and operations are involved, are effective at increasing the + robustness of software and the security knowledge of the teams involved. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 5 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - G-EG-A-2 + - G-EG-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Mutual review of source code is not explicitly required in ISO 27001 may + be + - 7.2.2 + - 12.6.1 + - 12.7.1 + iso27001-2022: + - Mutual review of source code is not explicitly required in ISO 27001 may + be + - 6.3 + - 8.8 + - 8.34 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Education%20and%20Guidance/subsection/Conduction%20of%20collaborative%20security%20checks%20with%20developers%20and%20system%20administrators + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Process: + Definition of simple BCDR practices for critical components: + uuid: c72da779-86cc-45b1-a339-190ce5093171 + description: | + Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery (BCDR) is a plan and a process that enable an organization to quickly restore normal operations after a disruptive event, such as a cyberattack or natural disaster. + risk: | + If the disaster recovery actions are not clear, you risk slow reaction and remediation delays. + This applies to cyber attacks as well as natural emergencies, such as a power outage. + measure: | + Develop, document, and communicate a BCDR plan for all critical components. The plan must define roles and responsibilities, Service Level Agreements (SLAs), Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs), Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs), and failover procedures. Ensure all relevant personnel are trained and the plan is reviewed and updated regularly. + assessment: "- There is a documented BCDR plan covering all critical components + of the application(s).\n- The plan clearly defines responsibilities, SLAs, + RPOs, RTOs, and failover steps. \n- Relevant staff are aware of the plan, + and evidence of regular review and testing is available.\n" + level: 1 + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 4 + time: 3 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 17.1.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Process/subsection/Definition%20of%20simple%20BCDR%20practices%20for%20critical%20components + tags: + - none + Determining the protection requirement: + uuid: 72737130-472c-4984-80f8-9ab2f1c2ed5d + risk: "Not defining the protection requirement of applications can lead to wrong + prioritization, delayed remediation of \ncritical security issues, increasing + the risk of exploitation and potential damage to the organization." + measure: "Defining the protection requirement. \nThe protection requirements + for an application should consider:\n- Processed data criticality\n- Application + accessibility (internal vs. external)\n- Regulatory compliance\n- Other relevant + factors" + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + dependsOn: + - 2a44b708-734f-4463-b0cb-86dc46344b2f # Inventory of production components + implementation: + - uuid: 227d786c-dd76-4b81-b0b2-62389ab8f0fb + name: OWASP DefectDojo + tags: + - vulnerability management system + - owasp + url: https://github.com/DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo + description: | + DefectDojo is a security program and vulnerability management tool. DefectDojo allows you to manage your application security program, maintain product and application information, triage vulnerabilities and push findings into defect trackers. Consolidate your findings into one source of truth with DefectDojo. + - uuid: d2eb592d-c9b5-4c39-bff7-bb313a58e3a9 + name: Purify + tags: + - vulnerability management system + url: https://github.com/faloker/purify/ + description: | + The goal of Purify to be an easy-in-use and efficient tool to simplify a workflow of managing vulnerabilities delivered from various (even custom) tools. + - uuid: 3b99799c-e875-4cc2-aad7-5ce4564a1cde + name: Business friendly vulnerability management metrics + url: https://medium.com/uber-security-privacy/business-friendly-vulnerability-management-metrics-cfd702fd7705 + test-url-expects: + - 403 + tags: + - documentation + - vulnerability + - vulnerability management system + - uuid: 7ec30b0e-9681-427a-80ee-ab811d9e476f + name: DefectDojo Client + tags: + - Defectdojo + - statistics + url: https://github.com/SDA-SE/defectdojo-client + description: | + This projects contains the DefectDojo upload client and statistics client. It is for example used within the ClusterImageScanner. + references: + samm2: + - O-OM-A-2 + - G-PC-B-2 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.25 + - 5.12 + - 5.13 + - 5.1 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Process/subsection/Determining%20the%20protection%20requirement + tags: + - vulnerability-mgmt + - metrics + - vmm-measurements + Approval by reviewing any new version: + uuid: 3f63bdbc-c75f-4780-a941-e6ad42e894e1 + risk: An individual might forget to implement security measures to protect source + code or infrastructure components. + measure: On each new version (e.g. Pull Request) of source code or infrastructure + components a security peer review of the changes is performed (two eyes principle) + and approval given by the reviewer. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: [] + iso27001-2017: + - Peer review - four eyes principle is not explicitly required by ISO 27001 + - 6.1.2 + - 14.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - Peer review - four eyes principle is not explicitly required by ISO 27001 + - 5.3 + - 8.25 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Process/subsection/Approval%20by%20reviewing%20any%20new%20version + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Definition of a change management process: + uuid: b4193d32-3948-47e2-a326-3748c48019a1 + risk: The impact of a change is not controlled because these are not recorded + or documented. + measure: Each change of a system is automatically recorded and adequately logged. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 4 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: [] + iso27001-2017: + - 14.2.2 + - 12.1.2 + - 12.4.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.32 + - 8.15 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Process/subsection/Definition%20of%20a%20change%20management%20process + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none +Implementation: + Application Hardening: + App. Hardening Level 1 (50%): + uuid: b597928e-54d6-48a5-a806-8003dcd56aab + risk: Using an insecure application might lead to a compromised application. + This might lead to total data theft or data modification. + measure: | + Following frameworks like the + * OWASP Application Security Verification Standard Level 1 + * OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard + + in all applications provides a good baseline. Implement 50% of the recommendations. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 1 + description: | + To tackle the security of code developed in-house, OWASP offers an extensive collection of [Cheatsheets](https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/) demonstrating how to implement features securely. Moreover, the Security Knowledge Framework[1] offers an extensive library of code patterns spanning several programming languages. These patterns can be used to not only jumpstart the development process, but also do so securely. + + [...] + + ### Planning aka Requirements Gathering & Analysis + The Requirements gathering process tries to answer the question: _"What is the system going to do?"_ At this stage, the [SAMM project](https://owaspsamm.org/model/) offers 3 distinct maturity levels covering both [in-house](https://owaspsamm.org/model/design/security-requirements/stream-a/) software development and [third party](https://owaspsamm.org/model/design/security-requirements/stream-b/) supplier security. + + ![SAMM Requirements](https://github.com/OWASP/www-project-integration-standards/raw/master/writeups/owasp_in_sdlc/images/OWASP-in0.png) + + Organizations can use these to add solid security considerations at the start of the Software Development or Procurement process. + + These general security considerations can be audited by using a subsection of the ASVS controls in section V1 as a questionnaire. This process attempts to ensure that every feature has concrete security considerations. + + In case of internal development and if the organization maps Features to Epics, the [Security Knowledge Framework](https://securityknowledgeframework.org/) can be used to facilitate this process by leveraging its questionnaire function, shown below. + + Source: [OWASP Project Integration](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/OWASP/www-project-integration-standards/master/writeups/owasp_in_sdlc/index.md) + implementation: + - uuid: 88767cde-1610-402e-98ec-bc3575377183 + name: OWASP ASVS + tags: [] + url: https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/ + - uuid: 7bf90650-a53a-4581-a214-1afd5de3a059 + name: OWASP MASVS + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/OWASP/masvs + - uuid: 596cb528-8981-4723-bcc3-22c261f26114 + name: API Security Maturity Model for Authorization + tags: + - api + url: https://curity.io/resources/learn/the-api-security-maturity-model/ + - uuid: 6150533e-58ca-4b52-a9b2-6226545d9ea0 + name: Top 5 API Security Myths That Are Crushing Your Business + tags: + - documentation + - waf + url: https://thehackernews.com/2022/11/top-5-api-security-myths-that-are.html + description: | + There are several myths and misconceptions about API security. These myths about securing APIs are crushing your business + references: + samm2: + - D-SR-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 13.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.22 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Application%20Hardening/subsection/App.%20Hardening%20Level%201%20%2850%25%29 + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Context-aware output encoding: + uuid: e1f37abb-d848-4a3a-b3df-65e91a89dcb7 + description: "**Input validation** stops malicious data from entering your system. + \\\n**Output encoding** neutralizes malicious data before rendering to user, + or the next system.\n\nInput validation and output encoding work together. + Apply both. \n\n**Context-aware output encoding** encodes data differently, + depending on its context. In the sample below the `{{bad_data}}` must be encoded + differently, depending on its context, to render safe HTML.\n\n```html\n
{{bad_data}}
\nClick me\n\n\n```\n" + risk: If an attacker manages to slip though your input validation, the attacker + may gain control over the user session or execute arbitrary actions. + measure: "* Use modern secure frameworks such as React/Angular/Vue/Svelte. The + default method here renders data in a safe way.\n* Use established and well-maintained + encoding libraries such as OWASP\u2019s Java Encoder and Microsoft\u2019s + AntiXSS.\n* Implement content security policies (CSP) to restrict the types + of content that can be loaded and executed.\n" + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 1 + implementation: + - uuid: 2d61e48f-bade-4332-a383-adc50c29673a + name: OWASP DOM based XSS Prevention CheatSheet + url: https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/DOM_based_XSS_Prevention_Cheat_Sheet.html + tags: [] + - uuid: ae97c9b0-308c-4dab-bff9-bf3330a897dc + name: CWE-838 Inappropriate Encoding for Output Context + tags: + - documentation + - cwe + url: https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/838.html + references: + samm2: + - D-SR-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 13.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.22 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Application%20Hardening/subsection/Context-aware%20output%20encoding + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Parametrization: + uuid: 00e91a8a-3972-4692-8679-674ab8547486 + description: | + By concatenating strings from user input to build SQL queries, an attacker can manipulate the query to do other unintentional SQL commands as well. + + This is called *SQL injection* but the principle applies to NoSql, and anywhere that your code is building commands that will be executed. + + Pay attention to these two lines of code. They seem similar, but behave very differently. + + * `sql.execute("SELECT * FROM table WHERE ID = " + id);` + * `sql.execute("SELECT * FROM table WHERE ID = ?", id);` + The second line is parameterized. The same principle applies to other types, such as command line execution, etc. + risk: "Systems vulnerable to injections may lead to data breaches, loss of data, + \nunauthorized alteration of data, or complete database compromise or downtime.\n\nThis + applies to SQL, NoSql, LDAP, XPath, email headers OS commands, etc.\n" + measure: | + * Identify which of the types your application is using. Check that you use: + * Use _parametrized queries_ (or _prepared statements_) + * For database queries, you may also use: + * Use _stored procedures_ () + * Use ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) tools that automatically handle input sanitization + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 1 + implementation: + - uuid: d880fa0f-9dbb-454e-a003-d844fad31ab4 + name: OWASP Parameterization CheatSheet + url: https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Query_Parameterization_Cheat_Sheet.html + tags: [] + references: + samm2: + - D-SR-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 13.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.22 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Application%20Hardening/subsection/Parametrization + comments: "" + tags: + - none + App. Hardening Level 1: + uuid: cf819225-30cb-4702-8e32-60225eedc33d + risk: Using an insecure application might lead to a compromised application. + This might lead to total data theft or data modification. + measure: | + Following frameworks like the + * OWASP Application Security Verification Standard Level 1 + * OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard + + in all applications provides a good baseline. Implement 95%-100% of the recommendations. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 2 + dependsOn: + - b597928e-54d6-48a5-a806-8003dcd56aab # App. Hardening Level 1 (50%) + description: | + To tackle the security of code developed in-house, OWASP offers an extensive collection of [Cheatsheets](https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/) demonstrating how to implement features securely. Moreover, the Security Knowledge Framework[1] offers an extensive library of code patterns spanning several programming languages. These patterns can be used to not only jump-start the development process, but also do so securely. + + [...] + + ### Planning aka Requirements Gathering & Analysis + The Requirements gathering process tries to answer the question: _"What is the system going to do?"_ At this stage, the [SAMM project](https://owaspsamm.org/model/) offers 3 distinct maturity levels covering both [in-house](https://owaspsamm.org/model/design/security-requirements/stream-a/) software development and [third party](https://owaspsamm.org/model/design/security-requirements/stream-b/) supplier security. + + ![SAMM Requirements](https://github.com/OWASP/www-project-integration-standards/raw/master/writeups/owasp_in_sdlc/images/OWASP-in0.png) + + Organizations can use these to add solid security considerations at the start of the Software Development or Procurement process. + + These general security considerations can be audited by using a subsection of the ASVS controls in section V1 as a questionnaire. This process attempts to ensure that every feature has concrete security considerations. + + In case of internal development and if the organization maps Features to Epics, the [Security Knowledge Framework](https://securityknowledgeframework.org/) can be used to facilitate this process by leveraging its questionnaire function, shown below. + + Source: [OWASP Project Integration](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/OWASP/www-project-integration-standards/master/writeups/owasp_in_sdlc/index.md) + implementation: + - uuid: 88767cde-1610-402e-98ec-bc3575377183 + name: OWASP ASVS + tags: [] + url: https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/ + - uuid: 7bf90650-a53a-4581-a214-1afd5de3a059 + name: OWASP MASVS + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/OWASP/masvs + - uuid: 596cb528-8981-4723-bcc3-22c261f26114 + name: API Security Maturity Model for Authorization + tags: + - api + url: https://curity.io/resources/learn/the-api-security-maturity-model/ + - uuid: 6150533e-58ca-4b52-a9b2-6226545d9ea0 + name: Top 5 API Security Myths That Are Crushing Your Business + tags: + - documentation + - waf + url: https://thehackernews.com/2022/11/top-5-api-security-myths-that-are.html + description: | + There are several myths and misconceptions about API security. These myths about securing APIs are crushing your business + references: + samm2: + - D-SR-A-3 + iso27001-2017: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 13.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.22 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Application%20Hardening/subsection/App.%20Hardening%20Level%201 + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Containers are running as non-root: + uuid: a86c1fbc-28fd-4610-89a3-a7f73acfe45f + risk: |- + There are various reasons to run a container as non-root. Samples are listed: + ## Container Escape Vectors + + - Root privileges significantly increase the chance of breaking container isolation + - Root access can be leveraged to exploit kernel vulnerabilities + - Compromised root containers provide attackers with maximum privileges inside the container + - Greater potential for escaping container boundaries to the host system + + ## Host System Vulnerabilities + + Root containers can potentially: + + - Mount sensitive host filesystems + - Access critical device files + - Modify host network settings + - Interact with host system processes + - Override security controls + + ## Resource Management Issues + + Root privileges may allow containers to: + + - Bypass resource quotas and limits + - Modify control group (cgroup) settings + - Interfere with other containers' resources + - Circumvent memory and CPU restrictions + + Security Boundary Weakening + + - Violates the principle of least privilege + - Provides unnecessary elevated permissions + - Expands the potential attack surface + - Increases the impact of a successful compromise + measure: "Containers are running as non-root. This can be enforced in the image + itself or during runtime parameters \n(e.g. `podman run --user [...]`)." + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Virtual environments are not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 13.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Virtual environments are not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.22 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Application%20Hardening/subsection/Containers%20are%20running%20as%20non-root + tags: + - none + App. Hardening Level 2 (75%): + uuid: 03643ca2-03c2-472b-8e19-956bf02fe9b7 + risk: Using an insecure application might lead to a compromised application. + This might lead to total data theft or data modification. + measure: | + Following frameworks like the + * OWASP Application Security Verification Standard Level 2 + * OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard Level 2 + + Implement 75% of the recommendations. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: 88767cde-1610-402e-98ec-bc3575377183 + name: OWASP ASVS + tags: [] + url: https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/ + - uuid: 7bf90650-a53a-4581-a214-1afd5de3a059 + name: OWASP MASVS + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/OWASP/masvs + - uuid: 6150533e-58ca-4b52-a9b2-6226545d9ea0 + name: Top 5 API Security Myths That Are Crushing Your Business + tags: + - documentation + - waf + url: https://thehackernews.com/2022/11/top-5-api-security-myths-that-are.html + description: | + There are several myths and misconceptions about API security. These myths about securing APIs are crushing your business + references: + samm2: + - D-SR-A-3 + iso27001-2017: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 13.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.22 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Application%20Hardening/subsection/App.%20Hardening%20Level%202%20%2875%25%29 + isImplemented: false + comments: "" + dependsOn: + - cf819225-30cb-4702-8e32-60225eedc33d # App. Hardening Level 1 + tags: + - none + Secure headers: + uuid: 29318d60-18ce-4526-80ea-f5928e49f639 + risk: | + Missing or misconfigured security headers can lead to various security vulnerabilities, e.g.: + - Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) due to missing Content Security Policy + - Clickjacking attacks due to missing X-Frame-Options + - Information disclosure through Server header exposure + - SSL/TLS downgrade attacks due to missing HSTS + - Cross-site scripting and injection due to missing security headers + measure: | + Implement and enforce security headers across all applications and services + + Implementation Methods: + 1. Reverse Proxy/Load Balancer: Configure at nginx/Apache level + 2. Web Application: Implement in the application middleware + 3. Service Mesh: Configure at the ingress controller level + 4. Standard Docker Image: Use secure base images with preset headers + + Remove or Secure: + - Server header: Hide server version information + - X-Powered-By: Remove technology stack information + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: 370b7f35-4da7-4833-89d6-7266b82ea07e + name: OWASP Secure Headers Project + tags: + - header + - documentation + url: https://owasp.org/www-project-secure-headers/ + description: "The OWASP Secure Headers Project (also called OSHP) describes + HTTP response headers that your application can use \nto increase the security + of your application. Once set, these HTTP response headers can restrict + modern browsers \nfrom running into easily preventable vulnerabilities. + The OWASP Secure Headers Project intends to raise awareness\nand use of + these headers." + meta: + implementationGuide: | + Essential headers: + - Content-Security-Policy: Define trusted sources for content + - Strict-Transport-Security: Enforce HTTPS connections + - X-Frame-Options: Prevent clickjacking attacks + - X-Content-Type-Options: Prevent MIME-type sniffing + - X-XSS-Protection: Enable browser's XSS filtering + - Referrer-Policy: Control information in the Referrer header + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 13.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.22 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/cre/620-421 + tags: + - none + App. Hardening Level 2: + uuid: ffe86caf-2fec-4630-b514-2db83983984d + risk: Using an insecure application might lead to a compromised application. + This might lead to total data theft or data modification. + measure: | + Following frameworks like the + * OWASP Application Security Verification Standard Level 2 + * OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard Level 2 + + Implement 95%-100% of the recommendations. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 4 + implementation: + - uuid: 88767cde-1610-402e-98ec-bc3575377183 + name: OWASP ASVS + tags: [] + url: https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/ + - uuid: 7bf90650-a53a-4581-a214-1afd5de3a059 + name: OWASP MASVS + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/OWASP/masvs + references: + samm2: + - D-SR-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 13.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.22 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Application%20Hardening/subsection/App.%20Hardening%20Level%202 + isImplemented: false + comments: "" + dependsOn: + - 03643ca2-03c2-472b-8e19-956bf02fe9b7 # App. Hardening Level 2 (75%) + tags: + - none + App. Hardening Level 3: + uuid: 4cae98c2-4163-44ed-bb88-3c67c569533a + risk: Using an insecure application might lead to a compromised application. + This might lead to total data theft or data modification. + measure: | + Following frameworks like the + * OWASP Application Security Verification Standard Level 3 + * OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard + + Implement 95%-100% of the recommendations. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 4 + time: 4 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + level: 5 + implementation: + - uuid: 88767cde-1610-402e-98ec-bc3575377183 + name: OWASP ASVS + tags: [] + url: https://owasp.org/www-project-application-security-verification-standard/ + - uuid: 7bf90650-a53a-4581-a214-1afd5de3a059 + name: OWASP MASVS + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/OWASP/masvs + references: + samm2: + - D-SR-A-3 + iso27001-2017: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 13.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.22 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Application%20Hardening/subsection/App.%20Hardening%20Level%203 + dependsOn: + - ffe86caf-2fec-4630-b514-2db83983984d # App. Hardening Level 2 + tags: + - none + Development and Source Control: + Version control: + uuid: 066084c6-1135-4635-9cc5-9e75c7c5459f + description: |- + Use a _version control system_ like Github, Gitlab, Bitbucket, etc to version your source code. + Also known as _source control_, _revision control_, or _source code management_. + risk: Without version control, it is challenging to track changes, collaborate + effectively, and maintain a history of code modifications. Rollback to earlier + versions is hard. + measure: Version your source code in order to identify deployed features and + issues. This includes application and infrastructure code, jenkins configuration, + container and virtual machine images definitions. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 3 + usefulness: 5 + level: 1 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-1 + - I-SB-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 12.1.1 + - 12.1.2 + - 14.2.2 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 5.37 + - 8.32 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Development%20and%20Source%20Control/subsection/Version%20control + tags: + - none + Require a PR before merging: + uuid: e7598ac4-b082-4e56-b7df-e2c6b426a5e2 + risk: Intentional or accidental alterations in critical branches like main (or + master). + measure: Define source code management system policies (e.g. branch protection + rules, mandatory code reviews from at least one person, ...) to ensure that + changes to critical branches are only possible under defined conditions. These + policies can be implemented at repository level or organization level, depending + on the source code management system. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: b1b88bc5-5a22-4888-a27b-acce3d9fe29a + name: Improve code quality with branch policies + url: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/repos/git/branch-policies?view=azure-devops + tags: + - source-code-protection + - scm + - uuid: 99211481-de9c-4358-880e-628366416a27 + name: About protected branches + url: https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-protected-branches/about-protected-branches + tags: + - source-code-protection + - scm + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Peer review - four eyes principle is not explicitly required by ISO 27001 + - 6.1.2 + - 14.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - Peer review - four eyes principle is not explicitly required by ISO 27001 + - 5.3 + - 8.25 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Development%20and%20Source%20Control/subsection/Require%20a%20PR%20before%20merging + tags: + - none + Block force pushes: + uuid: c7d99b18-c3e1-4d22-b2e3-9aa9146c0b17 + risk: "Misuse of force push can lead to loss of work. It may overwrite remote + \nbranches without warning, potentially erasing valuable contributions from + team members. This can disrupt collaboration, \ncause data loss, and create + confusion in the development process.\n\nBypassing the pull request process + might remove an important code review step. \nThis increases the risk of merging + low-quality or buggy code into the main branch, potentially introducing bugs + in the codebase." + measure: Mandate blocking of force pushes in the version control platform. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + dependsOn: + - e7598ac4-b082-4e56-b7df-e2c6b426a5e2 # Require a PR before merging + implementation: + - uuid: b1b88bc5-5a22-4888-a27b-acce3d9fe29a + name: Improve code quality with branch policies + url: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/repos/git/branch-policies?view=azure-devops + tags: + - source-code-protection + - scm + - uuid: 99211481-de9c-4358-880e-628366416a27 + name: About protected branches + url: https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-protected-branches/about-protected-branches + tags: + - source-code-protection + - scm + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 6.1.2 + - 14.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.3 + - 8.25 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Development%20and%20Source%20Control/subsection/Block%20force%20pushes + tags: + - none + Dismiss stale PR approvals: + uuid: ea6f69f7-54a5-4922-ac15-a77ff0c16162 + risk: Intentional or accidental alterations in critical branches like main (or + master) through post-approval code additions. + measure: Implement a policy where any commits made after a pull request has + been approved automatically revoke that approval, necessitating a fresh review + and re-approval process. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + level: 3 + dependsOn: + - e7598ac4-b082-4e56-b7df-e2c6b426a5e2 # Require a PR before merging + implementation: + - uuid: b1b88bc5-5a22-4888-a27b-acce3d9fe29a + name: Improve code quality with branch policies + url: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/repos/git/branch-policies?view=azure-devops + tags: + - source-code-protection + - scm + - uuid: 99211481-de9c-4358-880e-628366416a27 + name: About protected branches + url: https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-protected-branches/about-protected-branches + tags: + - source-code-protection + - scm + - uuid: 86c6bdba-73c0-4c99-bbda-81b85c9fe2a4 + name: Enforcement of commit signing + tags: + - signing + url: https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-protected-branches/managing-a-branch-protection-rule + description: Usage of branch protection rules + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Peer review - four eyes principle is not explicitly required by ISO 27001 + - 6.1.2 + - 14.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - Peer review - four eyes principle is not explicitly required by ISO 27001 + - 5.3 + - 8.25 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Development%20and%20Source%20Control/subsection/Dismiss%20stale%20PR%20approvals + tags: + - none + Require status checks to pass: + uuid: ac8730a2-ccc0-465c-9550-d91edae9d5ee + risk: Organizations risk introducing broken builds, quality issues, and security + vulnerabilities into their codebase. + measure: Mandate passing of security related specified status checks, like successful + builds or static application security tests, before proceeding. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + level: 3 + dependsOn: + - e7598ac4-b082-4e56-b7df-e2c6b426a5e2 # Require a PR before merging + implementation: + - uuid: b1b88bc5-5a22-4888-a27b-acce3d9fe29a + name: Improve code quality with branch policies + url: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/repos/git/branch-policies?view=azure-devops + tags: + - source-code-protection + - scm + - uuid: 99211481-de9c-4358-880e-628366416a27 + name: About protected branches + url: https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-protected-branches/about-protected-branches + tags: + - source-code-protection + - scm + - uuid: 86c6bdba-73c0-4c99-bbda-81b85c9fe2a4 + name: Enforcement of commit signing + tags: + - signing + url: https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-protected-branches/managing-a-branch-protection-rule + description: Usage of branch protection rules + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 6.1.2 + - 14.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.3 + - 8.25 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Development%20and%20Source%20Control/subsection/Require%20status%20checks%20to%20pass + tags: + - none + .gitignore: + uuid: 363a3eea-baf9-4010-88ca-bb8186a2989d + risk: Unintended leakage of secrets, debug, or workstation specific data + measure: .gitignore files help prevent accidental commits of secrets, debug, + or workstation specific data + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 5 + level: 4 + dependsOn: [] + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 12.1.1 + - 12.1.2 + - 14.2.2 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 5.37 + - 8.32 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Development%20and%20Source%20Control/subsection/.gitignore + tags: + - none + Local development linting & style checks performed: + uuid: 517b0957-4981-4ac0-b4c7-0d8d1934c474 + risk: Insecure or unmaintainable code base. + measure: Integrate static code analysis tools in IDEs. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 2 + level: 5 + description: "" + implementation: + - uuid: 0b7ec352-0c36-4de1-8912-617fc6c608fe + name: How to enforce a consistent coding style in your projects + url: https://www.meziantou.net/how-to-enforce-a-consistent-coding-style-in-your-projects.htm + tags: + - ide + - linting + - uuid: aa5ded61-5380-4da6-9474-afc36a397682 + name: In-Depth Linting of Your TypeScript While Coding + url: https://medium.com/@elenavilchik/in-depth-linting-of-your-typescript-while-coding-1d084affbf0 + test-url-expects: + - 403 + tags: + - ide + - linting + - uuid: 6a0948a7-4781-4858-9766-f4303971b28b + name: eslint + tags: [] + url: https://eslint.org/ + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - ISO 27001:2017 mapping is missing + iso27001-2022: + - ISO 27001:2022 mapping is missing + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Development%20and%20Source%20Control/subsection/Local%20development%20linting%20%26%20style%20checks%20performed + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Infrastructure Hardening: + MFA for admins: + uuid: 8098e416-e1ed-4ae4-a561-83efbe76bf57 + risk: One factor authentication is more vulnerable to brute force attacks and + is considered less secure. + measure: Two ore more factor authentication for all privileged accounts on systems + and applications + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + level: 1 + implementation: + - uuid: d5981117-9bc2-45ed-b4a4-383135dc13d8 + name: YubiKey - Smartcard + tags: [] + url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:Multi-factorAuthentication/ + - uuid: 6151cfb3-c894-421e-83da-cac0b2bfaec8 + name: SMS + tags: [] + - uuid: f69f5d03-691f-4e14-8fbc-ad66e2e5a12d + name: TOTP + tags: [] + url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:One-timePassword/ + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 9.2.4 + - 6.1.2 + - 14.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.17 + - 5.3 + - 8.25 + d3f: + - Multi-factorAuthentication + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/MFA%20for%20admins + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Simple access control for systems: + uuid: 82e499d1-f463-4a4b-be90-68812a874af6 + description: Basic access control for internal systems is implemented. + risk: Attackers a gaining access to other internal systems and application interfaces + is one breach occurs. + measure: All internal systems are using simple authentication + assessment: "- Presenting the documentation of the review of all user privileges + yearly. \n- Presenting the admin count and validating that there are less + than 5 admins per system.\n" + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 3 + usefulness: 5 + level: 1 + implementation: + - uuid: 41fda224-2980-443c-bfd4-0a1d4b520cb9 + name: HTTP-Basic Authentication + tags: [] + url: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Guides/Authentication + - uuid: e506f60b-747b-44b1-8fe8-f67ccd8f290e + name: VPN + tags: [] + url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/dao/artifact/d3f:VPNServer/ + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 9.4.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.3 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Simple%20access%20control%20for%20systems + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Usage of edge encryption at transit: + uuid: ad23be9c-5661-4f1f-81a3-5a5dc7061629 + risk: Evil actors might be able to perform a man in the middle attack and sniff + confidential information (e.g. authentication factors like passwords). + measure: |- + By using encryption at the edge of traffic in transit, it is impossible + or at least harder to sniff credentials or information being outside of the organization. + + Using standard secure protocols like HTTPS is recommended. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 1 + implementation: "" + references: + samm2: + - I-SD-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 10.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.24 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Usage%20of%20edge%20encryption%20at%20transit + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Applications are running in virtualized environments: + uuid: 3a94d55e-fd82-4996-9eb3-20d23ff2a873 + risk: Through a vulnerability in one service on a server, the attacker gains + access to other services running on the same server. + measure: Applications are running in a dedicated and isolated virtualized environments. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 5 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Virtual environments are not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 13.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Virtual environments are not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.22 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Applications%20are%20running%20in%20virtualized%20environments + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Backup: + uuid: 5c61fd6b-8106-4c68-ac28-a8a42f1c67dc + risk: If errors are experienced during the deployment process you want to deploy + an old release. However, due to changes in the database this is often unfeasible. + measure: Performing automated periodical backups are used. Backup before deployment + can help facilitate deployments whilst testing the backup restore processes. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: ba7348e5-1abf-4c7d-8fbc-49f99460930b + name: A complete backup of persisted data might be performed*. + tags: [] + - uuid: 9af7624e-0729-4eeb-b257-ebaf65f70355 + name: A Point in Time Recovery for databases should be implemented. + tags: [] + dependsOn: + - 74938a3f-1269-49b9-9d0f-c43a79a1985a # Defined deployment process + references: + samm2: + - TODO + iso27001-2017: + - 12.3 + - 14.2.6 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.13 + - 8.31 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Backup + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Baseline Hardening of the environment: + uuid: 5992c38c-8597-4035-89db-d15820d81c3a + risk: Using default configurations for a cluster environment leads to potential + risks. + measure: Harden environments according to best practices. Level 1 and partially + level 2 from hardening practices like 'CIS Kubernetes Bench for Security' + should be considered. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 4 + time: 3 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: edaec98d-dac7-4dfd-8ab3-42c471d5b9ff + name: CIS Kubernetes Benchmark for Security + tags: [] + url: https://www.cisecurity.org/benchmark/kubernetes + - uuid: 4dd23c4a-5a7e-4917-82cf-d00e0f04482f + name: CIS Docker Benchmark for Security + tags: [] + url: https://www.cisecurity.org/benchmark/docker + - uuid: f4d7c796-8574-4a88-ab00-98d245a115ef + name: For example for Cont + tags: [] + description: 'For example for Containers: Deny running containers as root, + deny using advanced privileges, deny mounting of the hole filesystem, ...' + url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ExecutionIsolation/ + - uuid: 3b7df373-2ad9-456e-9abe-439cdc9d4d8b + name: Attack Matrix Cloud + tags: + - mitre + url: https://attack.mitre.org/matrices/enterprise/cloud/ + description: Attack matrix for cloud + - uuid: 59881520-4c69-4922-a44e-99044a77de2b + name: Attack Matrix Containers + tags: + - mitre + url: https://attack.mitre.org/matrices/enterprise/containers/ + description: Attack matrix for containers + - uuid: 9fbc47ad-82bc-46d1-bba9-66815ab79935 + name: Attack Matrix Kubernetes + tags: + - mitre + url: https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/security/blog/2020/04/02/attack-matrix-kubernetes/ + description: Attack matrix for kubernetes + - uuid: b7a92886-aec9-4bf4-94c4-07cc191a97af + name: Defend the core kubernetes security at every layer + url: https://thenewstack.io/defend-the-core-kubernetes-security-at-every-layer/ + tags: + - documentation + - cluster + - kubernetes + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - system hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 13.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - ISO 27001:2022 mapping is missing + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Baseline%20Hardening%20of%20the%20environment + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Isolated networks for virtual environments: + uuid: 4ce24abd-8ba6-494c-828d-4d193e28e4a1 + risk: Virtual environments in default settings are able to access other virtual + environments on the network stack. By using virtual machines, it is often + possible to connect to other virtual machines. By using docker, one bridge + is used by default so that all containers on one host can communicate with + each other. + measure: The communication between virtual environments is controlled and regulated. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 3 + usefulness: 5 + level: 2 + dependsOn: [] + implementation: + - uuid: 9429d52c-203d-49ae-814f-1401210887cd + name: istio + tags: [] + url: https://istio.io/ + - uuid: fc0eda30-2bf7-466f-948e-e17584db9f30 + name: bridges + tags: [] + - uuid: e3c6fb92-3f7d-471f-9308-c62359f4f1b7 + name: firewalls + tags: [] + url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/dao/artifact/d3f:Firewall/ + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Virtual environments are not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 13.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Virtual environments are not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.22 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Isolated%20networks%20for%20virtual%20environments + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + MFA: + uuid: 598e9f13-1ac8-4a01-b85e-8fab93ee81de + risk: One factor authentication is more vulnerable to brute force attacks and + is considered less secure. + measure: Two ore more factor authentication for all accounts on all (important) + systems and applications + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + level: 2 + dependsOn: + - 8098e416-e1ed-4ae4-a561-83efbe76bf57 # MFA for admins + implementation: + - uuid: d5981117-9bc2-45ed-b4a4-383135dc13d8 + name: YubiKey - Smartcard + tags: [] + url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:Multi-factorAuthentication/ + - uuid: 6151cfb3-c894-421e-83da-cac0b2bfaec8 + name: SMS + tags: [] + - uuid: f69f5d03-691f-4e14-8fbc-ad66e2e5a12d + name: TOTP + tags: [] + url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:One-timePassword/ + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 9.2.4 + - 6.1.2 + - 14.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.17 + - 5.3 + - 8.25 + d3f: + - Multi-factorAuthentication + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/MFA + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Usage of an security account: + uuid: 746025a6-dbfb-4087-a000-e46acab64ee1 + risk: Having security auditing in the same account as infrastructure and applications + at the cloud provide might cause evil administrators (or threat actors taking + over an account of an administrator) to alter evidence like audit logs. + measure: Usage of a separate account dedicated for security activities. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 2 + resources: 3 + usefulness: 4 + level: 2 + implementation: "" + references: + samm2: + - I-SD-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 10.1 + iso27001-2022: + - ISO 27001:2022 mapping is missing + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Usage%20of%20an%20security%20account + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Usage of encryption at rest: + uuid: 0ff45fb8-7eef-46ed-9b3a-84c955cd7060 + risk: Evil actors might be able to access data and read information, e.g. from + physical hard disks. + measure: By using encryption at rest, it is impossible or at least harder to + to read information. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 2 + implementation: "" + references: + samm2: + - I-SD-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 10.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.24 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Usage%20of%20encryption%20at%20rest + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Usage of test and production environments: + uuid: bfdacb52-1e3f-431d-ae72-d844a5e86415 + risk: Security tests are not running regularly because test environments are + missing + measure: A test and a production like environment is used + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 5 + usefulness: 4 + level: 2 + dependsOn: + - 74938a3f-1269-49b9-9d0f-c43a79a1985a # Defined deployment process + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 12.1.4 + - 17.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.31 + - 8.14 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Usage%20of%20test%20and%20production%20environments + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Virtual environments are limited: + uuid: 760f1056-b0ee-4f22-a35b-f65446f944ca + risk: Denial of service (internally by an attacker or unintentionally by a bug) + on one service effects other services + measure: All virtual environments are using resource limits on hard disks, memory + and CPU + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 3 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + dependsOn: + - 3a94d55e-fd82-4996-9eb3-20d23ff2a873 # Applications are running in virtualized environments + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Virtual environments are not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 12.1.3 + - 13.1.3 + - 17.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - Virtual environments are not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.6 + - 8.22 + - 8.14 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Virtual%20environments%20are%20limited + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Filter outgoing traffic: + uuid: 6df508ef-86fc-4c22-bd9f-646c3127ce7d + risk: A compromised infrastructure component might try to send out stolen data. + measure: Having a whitelist and explicitly allowing egress traffic provides + the ability to stop unauthorized data leakage. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 3 + usefulness: 2 + level: 3 + dependsOn: [] + implementation: + - uuid: 4a024319-4510-4a53-a8b6-8f35b6c01867 + name: Open Policy Agent + tags: [] + url: https://www.openpolicyagent.org/ + - uuid: e3c6fb92-3f7d-471f-9308-c62359f4f1b7 + name: firewalls + tags: [] + url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/dao/artifact/d3f:Firewall/ + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Virtual environments are not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 13.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Virtual environments are not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.22 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Filter%20outgoing%20traffic + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Immutable infrastructure: + uuid: 48e92bb1-fdba-40e8-b6c2-35de0d431833 + risk: The availability of IT systems might be disturbed due to components failures + measure: Redundancies in the IT systems + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + dependsOn: + - 8b994601-575e-4ea5-b228-accb18c8e514 # Infrastructure as Code + implementation: + - uuid: b206481f-9c66-45e2-843c-37c5730580cd + name: Remove direct access to infrastructure + tags: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 17.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.14 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Immutable%20infrastructure + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Infrastructure as Code: + uuid: 8b994601-575e-4ea5-b228-accb18c8e514 + risk: No tracking of changes in systems might lead to errors in the configuration. + In additions, it might lead to unauthorized changes. An examples is jenkins. + measure: Systems are setup by code. A full environment can be provisioned. In + addition, software like Jenkins 2 can be setup and configured in in code too. + The code should be stored in a version control system. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 5 + resources: 4 + usefulness: 4 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: b0931397-2402-44f1-814b-63292ab4a339 + name: GitOps + tags: [] + url: https://www.redhat.com/en/topics/devops/what-is-gitops + - uuid: 73747d35-2185-4f22-94a0-723288fa283c + name: Ansible + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/ansible/ansible + - uuid: 691c443f-b6e2-498d-94dc-778d8d51cfce + name: Chef + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/chef/chef + - uuid: eb7f76a8-87e5-4394-af4c-c09487c85982 + name: Puppet + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppet + - uuid: 321dcfe4-d2fc-4dd2-85bf-aac563958458 + name: Jenkinsfile + tags: [] + url: https://www.jenkins.io/doc/book/pipeline/jenkinsfile/ + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 12.1.1 + - 12.1.2 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 5.37 + - 8.32 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Infrastructure%20as%20Code + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Limitation of system events: + uuid: e5386abf-9154-4752-a1a8-c3a8900f732d + risk: System events (system calls) can lead to privilege escalation. + measure: System calls are limited. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 5 + level: 3 + dependsOn: + - 1cd5e4b8-be36-4726-adc7-d8f843f47ac8 # Audit of system events + implementation: + - uuid: 0cc7e68b-f7d9-4e66-8065-47d076129ffd + name: seccomp + tags: [] + url: https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/seccomp.2.html + - uuid: 73ab2e3d-11a7-459d-8b57-9337662bd1ff + name: strace + tags: [] + url: https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/strace.1.html + - uuid: 32b64e6e-5187-45e3-b4f3-f5f9a9739012 + name: Falco + tags: + - falco + - systemcall + - monitoring + url: https://github.com/falcosecurity/falco + description: | + Falco makes it easy to consume kernel events, and enrich those events with information from Kubernetes and the rest of the cloud native stack. + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - System hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + iso27001-2022: + - ISO 27001:2022 mapping is missing + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Limitation%20of%20system%20events + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Role based authentication and authorization: + uuid: 070bb14b-e04a-4f3d-896a-a08eba7a35f9 + risk: Everyone is able to get unauthorized access to information on systems + or to modify information unauthorized on systems. + measure: The usage of a (role based) access control helps to restrict system + access to authorized users. And enhancement is to use *attribute based access + control*. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: 04edc63e-d389-48dd-b365-552aaf4ea004 + name: Directory Service + tags: [] + url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/dao/artifact/d3f:DirectoryService/ + - uuid: cc55cba1-ea0a-466e-99c5-337c9da2b00e + name: Plugins + tags: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 9.4.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.3 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Role%20based%20authentication%20and%20authorization + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Usage of internal encryption at transit: + uuid: ecb0184c-6bc9-45da-bbbb-a983797ffc93 + risk: Evil actors within the organization of traffic in transit might be able + to perform a man in the middle attack and sniff confidential information (e.g. + authentication factors like passwords) + measure: By using encryption internally, e.g. inside of a cluster, it is impossible + or at least harder to sniff credentials. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 4 + resources: 3 + usefulness: 4 + level: 3 + implementation: "" + references: + samm2: + - I-SD-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 10.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.24 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Usage%20of%20internal%20encryption%20at%20transit + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Usage of security by default for components: + uuid: 11b3848e-e931-4146-a35d-35409ada24ee + risk: Components (images, libraries, applications) are not hardened. + measure: Hardening of components is important, specially for image on which + other teams base on. Hardening should be performed on the operation system + and on the services inside (e.g. Nginx or a Java-Application). + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 4 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: d7fb1f5a-05e3-49f7-ae67-00bfb8f8410c + name: 'For applications: Check default encoding' + tags: [] + - uuid: 7e744f11-976e-46b6-88d4-f39b2965dfaf + name: managing secrets + tags: [] + url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:CredentialHardening/ + - uuid: 520517ef-2911-4efc-8e1b-dcc9389aca45 + name: crypto + tags: [] + - uuid: ba6bd46c-2069-4f4d-b26c-7334a7553339 + name: authentication + tags: [] + url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/dao/artifact/d3f:AuthenticationServer/ + dependsOn: + - f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b # Defined build process + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + iso27001-2022: + - ISO 27001:2022 mapping is missing + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Usage%20of%20security%20by%20default%20for%20components + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + WAF baseline: + uuid: f0e01814-3b88-4bd0-a3a9-f91db001d20b + risk: Vulnerable input, such as exploits, can infiltrate the application via + numerous entry points, posing a significant security threat. + measure: |- + Implementing a web application firewall (WAF) is a critical security control. At a baseline level, the objective is to finely balance the reduction of false positives, maintaining user experience, against a potential increase in the less noticeable false negatives. + Begin with the WAF in a monitoring state to understand the traffic and threats. Progressively enforce blocking actions based on intelligence gathered, ensuring minimal disruption to legitimate traffic. + description: | + A baseline WAF configuration provides essential defense against common vulnerabilities, acting as a first line of automated threat detection and response. + Steps: + - Configure WAF in alert mode to establish traffic patterns + - Analyze alerts and adjust sensitivity to optimize for fewer false positives + - Gradually switch to a proactive blocking stance as confidence in the accuracy of the rules increases + + It's crucial to monitor and update the WAF configuration to adapt to evolving threats and minimize the potential for both false positives and false negatives. + + There are debates on how useful a WAF is for APIs. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 4 + resources: 3 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + dependsOn: + - e1f37abb-d848-4a3a-b3df-65e91a89dcb7 # Context-aware output encoding + implementation: + - uuid: 6150533e-58ca-4b52-a9b2-6226545d9ea0 + name: Top 5 API Security Myths That Are Crushing Your Business + tags: + - documentation + - waf + url: https://thehackernews.com/2022/11/top-5-api-security-myths-that-are.html + description: | + There are several myths and misconceptions about API security. These myths about securing APIs are crushing your business + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 13.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.22 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/WAF%20baseline + comments: ~ + tags: + - none + Hardening of the Environment: + uuid: dcf9601b-b4f2-4e25-9143-e39af75f7c33 + risk: Using default configurations for a cluster environment leads to potential + risks. + measure: Harden environments according to best practices. Level 2 and partially + level 3 from hardening practices like 'CIS Kubernetes Bench for Security' + should be considered. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 4 + time: 4 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 4 + implementation: + - uuid: edaec98d-dac7-4dfd-8ab3-42c471d5b9ff + name: CIS Kubernetes Benchmark for Security + tags: [] + url: https://www.cisecurity.org/benchmark/kubernetes + - uuid: 4dd23c4a-5a7e-4917-82cf-d00e0f04482f + name: CIS Docker Benchmark for Security + tags: [] + url: https://www.cisecurity.org/benchmark/docker + - uuid: f4d7c796-8574-4a88-ab00-98d245a115ef + name: For example for Cont + tags: [] + description: 'For example for Containers: Deny running containers as root, + deny using advanced privileges, deny mounting of the hole filesystem, ...' + url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/technique/d3f:ExecutionIsolation/ + - uuid: 3b7df373-2ad9-456e-9abe-439cdc9d4d8b + name: Attack Matrix Cloud + tags: + - mitre + url: https://attack.mitre.org/matrices/enterprise/cloud/ + description: Attack matrix for cloud + - uuid: 59881520-4c69-4922-a44e-99044a77de2b + name: Attack Matrix Containers + tags: + - mitre + url: https://attack.mitre.org/matrices/enterprise/containers/ + description: Attack matrix for containers + - uuid: 9fbc47ad-82bc-46d1-bba9-66815ab79935 + name: Attack Matrix Kubernetes + tags: + - mitre + url: https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/security/blog/2020/04/02/attack-matrix-kubernetes/ + description: Attack matrix for kubernetes + - uuid: b7a92886-aec9-4bf4-94c4-07cc191a97af + name: Defend the core kubernetes security at every layer + url: https://thenewstack.io/defend-the-core-kubernetes-security-at-every-layer/ + tags: + - documentation + - cluster + - kubernetes + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 13.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.22 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Hardening%20of%20the%20Environment + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Production near environments are used by developers: + uuid: e14de741-94b3-447c-8b07-eea947d82e61 + risk: In case an errors occurs in production, the developer need to be able + to create a production near environment on a local development environment. + measure: Usage of infrastructure as code helps to create a production near environment. + The developer needs to be trained in order to setup a local development environment. + In addition, it should be possible to create production like test data. Often + personal identifiable information is anonymized in order to comply with data + protection laws. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 3 + usefulness: 4 + level: 4 + dependsOn: + - 67e1a9aa-9fbf-4ec5-a2de-400f01960c51 # Automated deployment process + - 8b994601-575e-4ea5-b228-accb18c8e514 # Infrastructure as Code + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.1.4 + - 17.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.31 + - 8.14 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Production%20near%20environments%20are%20used%20by%20developers + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Usage of a chaos technology: + uuid: f8e80f18-2503-4e3e-b3bc-7f67bb28defe + risk: Due to manual changes on a system, they are not replaceable anymore. In + case of a crash it might happen that a planned redundant system is unavailable. + In addition, it is hard to replay manual changes. + measure: A randomized periodically shutdown of systems makes sure, that nobody + will perform manual changes to a system. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 5 + resources: 5 + usefulness: 3 + level: 4 + implementation: + - uuid: c117e79b-8223-4e55-9da5-efbf5d741c15 + name: Chaos Monkey + tags: + - chaos + - testing + url: https://github.com/Netflix/chaosmonkey + description: Chaos Monkey is a resiliency tool that helps applications tolerate + random instance failures. Chaos Monkey randomly terminates virtual machine + instances and containers that run inside of your production environment. + Exposing engineers to failures more frequently incentivizes them to build + resilient services. + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-3 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 17.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 5.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/Usage%20of%20a%20chaos%20technology + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + WAF medium: + uuid: f0e01814-3b88-4bd0-a3a9-f91db001d20b-medium + risk: The threat from malicious inputs remains high, with exploits seeking to + exploit any vulnerabilities present at the various points of entry to the + application. + measure: |- + A WAF deployed with a medium level of protection strengthens the security posture by striking a more advanced balance between the detection of genuine threats and the minimization of false alarms. + Maintain the WAF in alert mode initially to ensure a comprehensive understanding of potential threats. With a medium-level configuration, the WAF settings are refined for greater precision in threat detection, with a stronger emphasis on security without significantly impacting legitimate traffic. + description: "A medium-level WAF configuration builds upon the baseline to offer + a more nuanced and responsive defense mechanism against a wider array of threats.\n\nSample + steps:\n - Implement an enhanced set of WAF rules based on baseline data\n + \ - Continuous monitoring and fine-tuning of the WAF configuration\n - Develop + a strategic incident response plan utilizing WAF insights \n \nThe + medium configuration requires diligent management and continuous improvement + to address new vulnerabilities while maintaining the integrity of application + access.\n\nThere are debates on how useful a WAF is for APIs.\n" + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 4 + time: 5 + resources: 4 + usefulness: 3 + level: 4 + dependsOn: + - f0e01814-3b88-4bd0-a3a9-f91db001d20b # WAF baseline + implementation: + - uuid: 6150533e-58ca-4b52-a9b2-6226545d9ea0 + name: Top 5 API Security Myths That Are Crushing Your Business + tags: + - documentation + - waf + url: https://thehackernews.com/2022/11/top-5-api-security-myths-that-are.html + description: | + There are several myths and misconceptions about API security. These myths about securing APIs are crushing your business + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 13.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.22 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/WAF%20medium + comments: ~ + tags: + - none + WAF Advanced: + uuid: f0e01814-3b88-4bd0-a3a9-f91db001d20b-advanced + risk: The presence of sophisticated threats necessitates a robust defense strategy + where application inputs are meticulously scrutinized for security breaches, + including advanced persistent threats and zero-day vulnerabilities. + measure: |- + An advanced WAF protection level includes rigorous input validation, rejecting any parameters not explicitly required, and custom rule sets that are dynamically updated in response to emerging threats. + The advanced WAF setup is designed to ensure all data is in the correct format and any superfluous input parameters are automatically rejected. It includes machine learning algorithms to detect anomalies, custom-developed rules for real-time traffic analysis, and seamless integration with existing security infrastructures to adapt to the ever-changing threat landscape. + description: | + This advanced configuration goes beyond typical WAF implementations by enforcing strict input format checks and parameter validation to prevent any unauthorized or malformed data from compromising the application. + + Sample Steps: + - Implement strict data type and format validation rules to ensure only correctly formatted data is processed. + - Establish a denylist for all parameters that are not explicitly required, blocking them by default. + - Develop and continuously refine custom rulesets based on the application's traffic patterns, user behavior, and known vulnerabilities. + - Integrate machine learning algorithms to enhance anomaly detection and automatic rule adjustment. + - Correlate and analyze WAF logs with other security systems like SIEM for comprehensive threat intelligence. + - Conduct regular red team exercises to test and validate the effectiveness of the WAF configurations against simulated advanced attack scenarios. + - Activate automated threat response mechanisms to immediately neutralize detected threats. + + Embracing an advanced WAF setup requires a proactive approach, with continuous improvement and updating of security measures to ensure all inputs are scrutinized and validated, thus maintaining a resilient security posture against sophisticated attacks. + + There are debates on how useful a WAF is for APIs. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 5 + time: 5 + resources: 5 + usefulness: 4 + level: 5 + dependsOn: + - f0e01814-3b88-4bd0-a3a9-f91db001d20b-medium # WAF medium + implementation: + - uuid: 6150533e-58ca-4b52-a9b2-6226545d9ea0 + name: Top 5 API Security Myths That Are Crushing Your Business + tags: + - documentation + - waf + url: https://thehackernews.com/2022/11/top-5-api-security-myths-that-are.html + description: | + There are several myths and misconceptions about API security. These myths about securing APIs are crushing your business + references: + samm2: + - O-EM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 13.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.22 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Infrastructure%20Hardening/subsection/WAF%20Advanced + comments: ~ + tags: + - none +Information Gathering: + Logging: + Centralized system logging: + uuid: 4eced38a-7904-4c45-adb0-50b663065540 + description: | + Centralized system logging involves collecting and storing system logs from multiple sources in a secure, central location. This approach improves log integrity, simplifies monitoring, and enables efficient incident response. + risk: | + Locally stored system logs can be manipulated by attackers unauthorized or might be corrupt or lost after an incident. In addition, it is hard to perform aggregation of logs. + measure: | + - Implement a centralized logging solution for all critical systems. + - System logs must be stored in a central repository, protected from unauthorized access and modification. + - Ensure that log collection is automated and covers all relevant system events. + level: 1 + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: 79f88310-d63e-471d-8e63-8c77f2281b66 + name: rsyslog + url: https://www.rsyslog.com/ + tags: + - tool + - logging + - uuid: 7a8fad2e-d642-4972-8501-74591b23feab + name: logstash + url: https://www.elastic.co/docs/reference/logstash/getting-started-with-logstash + tags: + - tool + - logging + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 12.4.1 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.15 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Logging/subsection/Centralized%20system%20logging + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Centralized application logging: + uuid: fe875e17-ae4a-45f8-a359-244aa4fcbc04 + risk: Local stored logs can be unauthorized manipulated by attackers with system + access or might be corrupt after an incident. In addition, it is hard to perform + an correlation of logs. This leads attacks, which can be performed silently. + measure: A centralized logging system is used and applications logs (including + application exceptions) are shipped to it. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 5 + level: 2 + dependsOn: + - 8a442d8e-0eb1-4793-a513-571aef982edd # Alerting + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 12.4.1 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.15 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Logging/subsection/Centralized%20application%20logging + tags: + - none + Logging of security events: + uuid: ccfdd0a8-991e-4269-ad77-c0a54ca655cb + description: | + Implement logging of security relevant events. The following events tend to be security relevant: + - successful/failed login/logout + - creation, change, and deletion of users + - errors during input validation and output creation + - exceptions and errors with security in their name + - transactions of value (e.g., financial transactions, costly operations) + - :unicorn: (special things of your application) + measure: Security-relevant events like login/logout or creation, change, deletion + of users should be logged. + assessment: | + - Show which events are logged. + - Show a test for one event logging. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 2 + credits: | + [AppSecure-nrw](https://github.com/AppSecure-nrw/security-belts/blob/master/orange/logging-of-security-events.md) + implementation: + - uuid: 7a8fad2e-d642-4972-8501-74591b23feab + name: logstash + url: https://www.elastic.co/docs/reference/logstash/getting-started-with-logstash + tags: + - tool + - logging + - uuid: f5da3a20-ab64-4ecf-b4e1-660c80036e45 + name: fluentd + tags: + - tool + url: https://www.fluentd.org/ + - uuid: 6226f8bc-2f6e-45c2-9232-98d2027e4531 + name: bash + tags: + - tool + url: https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/ + - uuid: 5a5c7d99-41e8-454a-86ae-a638c9787d8c + name: OWASP Logging CheatSheet + url: https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Logging_Cheat_Sheet.html + tags: + - logging + - documentation + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.4.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.15 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Logging/subsection/Logging%20of%20security%20events + risk: |- + * No track of security-relevant events makes it harder to analyze an incident. + * Security incident analysis takes significantly less time with proper security events, such that an attack can be stopped before the attacker reaches his goal. + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Analyze logs: + uuid: b217c8bb-5d61-4b41-a675-1083993f83b1 + risk: Not aware of attacks happening. + measure: Check logs for keywords. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: 1adf1ac0-8572-407b-a358-3976d9a225e2 + name: SigmaHQ + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - ISO 27001:2017 mapping is missing + iso27001-2022: + - ISO 27001:2022 mapping is missing + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Logging/subsection/Analyze%20logs + tags: + - none + Visualized logging: + uuid: 7c735089-6a83-419f-8b27-c1e676cedea1 + risk: System and application protocols are not visualized properly which leads + to no or very limited logging assessment. Specially developers might have + difficulty to read applications logs with unusually tools like the Linux tool + 'cat' + measure: Protocols are visualized in a simple to use real time monitoring system. + The GUI gives the ability to search for special attributes in the protocol. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 3 + resources: 3 + usefulness: 4 + level: 3 + dependsOn: + - 4eced38a-7904-4c45-adb0-50b663065540 # Centralized system logging + - fe875e17-ae4a-45f8-a359-244aa4fcbc04 # Centralized application logging + implementation: + - uuid: 38fe9d00-df8b-44b6-910d-ca0f02b5c5d3 + name: ELK-Stack + tags: [] + url: https://www.elastic.co/elastic-stack/ + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 12.4.1 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.15 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Logging/subsection/Visualized%20logging + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Correlation of security events: + uuid: ccf4561d-253f-4762-adcb-bc4622fd6fc5 + risk: Detection of security related events with hints on different systems/tools/metrics + is not possible. + measure: Events are correlated on one system. For example the correlation and + visualization of failed login attempts combined with successful login attempts. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 4 + time: 4 + resources: 4 + usefulness: 3 + level: 5 + dependsOn: + - 7c735089-6a83-419f-8b27-c1e676cedea1 # Visualized logging + - 8a442d8e-0eb1-4793-a513-571aef982edd # Alerting + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 12.4.1 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.15 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Logging/subsection/Correlation%20of%20security%20events + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + PII logging concept: + uuid: 613a73dc-4f60-49db-a6ce-4fb7bf8519f9 + risk: Personal identifiable information (PII) is logged and the privacy law + (e.g. General Data Protection Regulation) is not followed. + measure: A concept how to log PII is documented and applied. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 1 + level: 5 + implementation: + - uuid: 79f88310-d63e-471d-8e63-8c77f2281b66 + name: rsyslog + url: https://www.rsyslog.com/ + tags: + - tool + - logging + - uuid: 7a8fad2e-d642-4972-8501-74591b23feab + name: logstash + url: https://www.elastic.co/docs/reference/logstash/getting-started-with-logstash + tags: + - tool + - logging + - uuid: f5da3a20-ab64-4ecf-b4e1-660c80036e45 + name: fluentd + tags: + - tool + url: https://www.fluentd.org/ + - uuid: 6226f8bc-2f6e-45c2-9232-98d2027e4531 + name: bash + tags: + - tool + url: https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/ + references: + samm2: + - O-OM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 12.4.1 + - 18.1.1 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.15 + - 5.31 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Logging/subsection/PII%20logging%20concept + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Monitoring: + Simple application metrics: + uuid: e9a6d403-a467-445e-b98a-74f0c29da0b1 + description: | + Collecting basic operational data from applications, such as authentication attempts, transaction volumes, and resource usage, will help detect abnormal patterns that may indicate security incidents or system issues. + risk: | + Without monitoring application metrics, attacks or abnormal behaviors may go undetected, increasing the risk of successful exploitation, data breaches, and delayed incident response. + measure: | + Gathering of application metrics helps to identify incidents like brute force attacks, login/logout patterns, and unusual spikes in activity. Key metrics to monitor include: + - Authentication attempts (successful/failed logins) + - Transaction volumes and patterns (e.g. orders, payments) + - API call rates and response times + - User session metrics + - Resource utilization + + Example: An e-commerce application normally processes 100 orders per hour. A sudden spike to 1000 orders per hour could indicate either: + - A legitimate event (unannounced marketing campaign, viral social media post) + - A security incident (automated bulk purchase bots, credential stuffing attack) + + By monitoring these basic metrics, teams can quickly investigate abnormal patterns and determine if they represent security incidents requiring response. + assessment: | + - Basic application metrics are collected and reviewed. + level: 1 + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 5 + implementation: + - uuid: ddf221df-3517-42e4-b23d-c1d9a162744c + name: Prometheus + tags: [] + url: https://prometheus.io/ + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.4.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.15 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Monitoring/subsection/Simple%20application%20metrics + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Simple budget metrics: + uuid: f08a3219-6941-43ec-8762-4aff739f4664 + description: | + Monitoring resource usage and costs to prevent unexpected expenses. This is especially important in cloud environments where resource consumption can quickly exceed planned budgets. + risk: | + Failure to monitor budget metrics can result in unexpected costs, financial loss, and potential service disruption due to resource exhaustion or denial-of-service attacks. + measure: | + Set up budget monitoring and alerting for all critical resources. Use provider tools to track spending and configure alerts when thresholds are reached. Implement hard limits where possible to prevent budget overruns. + assessment: | + - The organization regularly monitors budget metrics + - Alerting outside given thresholds are implemented + level: 1 + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 5 + implementation: + - uuid: 73f6a52c-4fc2-45dc-991b-d5911b6c1ef8 + name: collected + tags: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.6 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Monitoring/subsection/Simple%20budget%20metrics + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Simple system metrics: + uuid: 3d1f4c3b-f713-46d9-933a-54a014a26c03 + description: | + Monitoring basic system performance data, such as CPU, memory, and disk usage, will help identify performance bottlenecks and potential security incidents. + risk: | + Without monitoring system metrics, it is difficult to detect incidents or performance issues, leading to delayed response, reduced availability, and increased risk of undetected attacks. + measure: | + Collect and monitor key system metrics, including CPU, memory, and disk usage. + assessment: | + - Basic system metrics are monitored and reviewed regularly + level: 1 + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 5 + implementation: + - uuid: 73f6a52c-4fc2-45dc-991b-d5911b6c1ef8 + name: collected + tags: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.6 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Monitoring/subsection/Simple%20system%20metrics + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Alerting: + uuid: 8a442d8e-0eb1-4793-a513-571aef982edd + risk: Incidents are discovered after they happened. + measure: | + Thresholds for metrics are set. In case the thresholds are reached, alarms are send out. Which should get attention due to the critically. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 5 + resources: 5 + usefulness: 5 + level: 2 + dependsOn: + - ded39bcf-4eaa-4c5f-9c94-09acde0a4734 # Visualized metrics + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-2 + - I-DM-A-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 16.1.2 + - 16.1.4 + - 12.1.4 + iso27001-2022: + - 6.8 + - 5.25 + - 8.31 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Monitoring/subsection/Alerting + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Monitoring of costs: + uuid: 10e23a8c-22ff-4487-a706-87ccc9d0798e + risk: Not monitoring costs might lead to unexpected high resource consumption + and a high invoice. + measure: Implement cost budgets. Setting of an alert threshold and sending out + errors when it is reached. In the best case, a second threshold with a limit + is set so that the cost can not go higher. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + dependsOn: + - e9a6d403-a467-445e-b98a-74f0c29da0b1 # Simple application metrics + - 3d1f4c3b-f713-46d9-933a-54a014a26c03 # Simple system metrics + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.6 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Monitoring/subsection/Monitoring%20of%20costs + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Visualized metrics: + uuid: ded39bcf-4eaa-4c5f-9c94-09acde0a4734 + risk: Not visualized metrics lead to restricted usage of metrics. + measure: Metrics are visualized in real time in a user friendly way. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + dependsOn: + - e9a6d403-a467-445e-b98a-74f0c29da0b1 # Simple application metrics + - 3d1f4c3b-f713-46d9-933a-54a014a26c03 # Simple system metrics + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.6 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Monitoring/subsection/Visualized%20metrics + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Advanced availability and stability metrics: + uuid: ed715b38-c34b-40cd-83fd-ce807f306fc1 + risk: Trends and advanced attacks are not detected. + measure: Advanced metrics are gathered in relation to availability and stability. + For example unplanned downtime's per year. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + level: 3 + dependsOn: + - e9a6d403-a467-445e-b98a-74f0c29da0b1 # Simple application metrics + - ded39bcf-4eaa-4c5f-9c94-09acde0a4734 # Visualized metrics + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.6 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Monitoring/subsection/Advanced%20availability%20and%20stability%20metrics + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Audit of system events: + uuid: 1cd5e4b8-be36-4726-adc7-d8f843f47ac8 + risk: System events (system calls) trends and attacks are not detected. + measure: Gathering of system calls. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + level: 3 + dependsOn: + - ded39bcf-4eaa-4c5f-9c94-09acde0a4734 # Visualized metrics + implementation: + - uuid: 32b64e6e-5187-45e3-b4f3-f5f9a9739012 + name: Falco + tags: + - falco + - systemcall + - monitoring + url: https://github.com/falcosecurity/falco + description: | + Falco makes it easy to consume kernel events, and enrich those events with information from Kubernetes and the rest of the cloud native stack. + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Monitoring/subsection/Audit%20of%20system%20events + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Deactivation of unused metrics: + uuid: 7f36b9ba-bc05-4fd6-9a2a-73344c249722 + risk: High resources are used while gathering unused metrics. + measure: Deactivation of unused metrics helps to free resources. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 5 + resources: 5 + usefulness: 5 + level: 3 + dependsOn: + - ded39bcf-4eaa-4c5f-9c94-09acde0a4734 # Visualized metrics + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 12.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.6 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Monitoring/subsection/Deactivation%20of%20unused%20metrics + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Grouping of metrics: + uuid: 42170a71-d4c8-47af-bd71-bf36875fd05b + risk: The analysis of metrics takes long. + measure: Meaningful grouping of metrics helps to speed up analysis. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 4 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 2 + level: 3 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 12.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.6 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Monitoring/subsection/Grouping%20of%20metrics + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Targeted alerting: + uuid: d6f06ae8-401a-4f44-85df-1079247fa030 + risk: People are bored (ignorant) of incident alarm messages, as they are not + responsible to react. + measure: By the definition of target groups for incidents people are only getting + alarms for incidents they are in charge for. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 5 + resources: 5 + usefulness: 5 + level: 3 + dependsOn: + - 8a442d8e-0eb1-4793-a513-571aef982edd # Alerting + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-2 + - I-DM-A-3 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 16.1.5 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 5.26 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Monitoring/subsection/Targeted%20alerting + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Advanced app. metrics: + uuid: d03bc410-74a7-4e92-82cb-d01a020cb6bf + risk: People are not looking into tests results. Vulnerabilities not recolonized, + even they are detected by tools. + measure: All defects from the dimension Test- and Verification are instrumented. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + level: 4 + dependsOn: + - e9a6d403-a467-445e-b98a-74f0c29da0b1 # Simple application metrics + - ded39bcf-4eaa-4c5f-9c94-09acde0a4734 # Visualized metrics + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Monitoring/subsection/Advanced%20app.%20metrics + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Coverage and control metrics: + uuid: d0d681e7-d6de-4829-ac64-a9eb2546aa0d + risk: The effectiveness of configuration, patch and vulnerability management + is unknown. + measure: "Usage of Coverage- and control-metrics to show the effectiveness of + the security program. Coverage is the degree in \n which a specific + security control for a specific target group is applied with all resources.\n + \ The control degree shows the actual application of security standards + and security-guidelines. Examples are gathering information on anti-virus, + anti-rootkits, patch management, server configuration and vulnerability management." + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 5 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + level: 4 + dependsOn: + - ded39bcf-4eaa-4c5f-9c94-09acde0a4734 # Visualized metrics + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + iso27001-2022: + - ISO 27001:2022 mapping is missing + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Monitoring/subsection/Coverage%20and%20control%20metrics + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Defense metrics: + uuid: e808028c-351c-42f1-bcd9-fba738d1fc55 + risk: IDS/IPS systems like packet- or application-firewalls detect and prevent + attacks. It is not known how many attacks has been detected and blocked. + measure: | + Gathering of defense metrics like TCP/UDP sources enables to assume the geographic location of the request. + Assuming a Kubernetes cluster with an egress-traffic filter (e.g. IP/domain based), an alert might be send out in case of every violation. For ingress-traffic, alerting might not even be considered. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 5 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + level: 4 + dependsOn: + - ded39bcf-4eaa-4c5f-9c94-09acde0a4734 # Visualized metrics + - 6df508ef-86fc-4c22-bd9f-646c3127ce7d # Filter outgoing traffic + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.4.1 + - 13.1.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.15 + - 8.2 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Monitoring/subsection/Defense%20metrics + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Screens with metric visualization: + uuid: 8746647c-638c-473f-8e17-82c068e4c311 + risk: Security related information is discovered too late during an incident. + measure: By having an internal accessible screen with a security related dashboards + helps to visualize incidents. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 5 + level: 4 + dependsOn: + - 42170a71-d4c8-47af-bd71-bf36875fd05b # Grouping of metrics + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 16.1.5 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 5.26 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Monitoring/subsection/Screens%20with%20metric%20visualization + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Metrics are combined with tests: + uuid: 71699daf-b2a4-466b-a0b2-89f7dbb18506 + risk: Changes might cause high load due to programming errors. + measure: Metrics during tests helps to identify programming errors. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 3 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 5 + level: 5 + dependsOn: + - 42170a71-d4c8-47af-bd71-bf36875fd05b # Grouping of metrics + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - O-IM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 + iso27001-2022: + - ISO 27001:2022 mapping is missing + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Monitoring/subsection/Metrics%20are%20combined%20with%20tests + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Test KPI: + Number of vulnerabilities/severity: + uuid: bc548cba-cb82-4f76-bd4b-325d9d256279 + risk: Failing to convey the number of vulnerabilities by severity might undermine + the effectiveness of product teams. This might lead to ignorance of findings. + measure: Measurement and communication of vulnerabilities per severity for components + like applications. At least quarterly. + description: |- + Communication can be performed in a simple way, e.g. text based during the build process. + This activity depends on at least one security testing implementation. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + dependsOn: [] + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-B-2 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.25 + - 5.12 + - 5.13 + - 5.1 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Test%20KPI/subsection/Number%20of%20vulnerabilities%2Fseverity + tags: + - vulnerability-mgmt + - metrics + - vmm-measurement + Number of vulnerabilities/severity/layer: + uuid: 0ec92899-a5cb-4649-984b-2fb1d6c784ad + risk: Failing to convey the number of vulnerabilities by severity and layer + (app/infra) might undermine the effectiveness of product teams. This might + lead to ignorance of findings. + measure: Measurement and communication of vulnerabilities per severity for components + like applications and split it depending on the layer (e.g. app/infra). At + least quarterly. + description: |- + Communication can be performed in a simple way, e.g. text based during the build process. + This activity depends on at least one security testing implementation. + Layers to consider (SCA): + - Cloud provider (if insights are possible) + - Runtimes, e.g. Kubernetes nodes + - Base images and container images + - Application + + Layers to consider SAST/DAST: + - Cloud provider + - Runtime, e.g. Kubernetes + - Base images and container images + - Application + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + dependsOn: [] + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-B-2 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.25 + - 5.12 + - 5.13 + - 5.1 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Test%20KPI/subsection/Number%20of%20vulnerabilities%2Fseverity%2Flayer + tags: + - vulnerability-mgmt + - metrics + - vmm-measurement + Patching mean time to resolution via PR: + uuid: 86d490b9-d798-4a5b-a011-ab9688014c46 + risk: Without measuring Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR) related to patching, + it is challenging to identify delays in the patching process. Unaddressed + vulnerabilities can be exploited by attackers, leading to potential security + breaches and data loss. + measure: "Measurement and communication of patching Mean Time to Resolution + (MTTR) in alignment with Service Level Agreements (SLAs), conducted at least + on a quarterly basis.\nThis includes the measurement of the existence of a + properly configured automated pull request (PR) tool (e.g., Dependabot or + Renovate) in a repository. \nIn addition, the measurement of the time from + opening an automated PR to merging it.\n\nAverage time to patch is visualized + per component/project/team." + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + dependsOn: + - 8ae0b92c-10e0-4602-ba22-7524d6aed488 # Automated PRs for patches + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-B-2 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.25 + - 5.12 + - 5.13 + - 5.1 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Test%20KPI/subsection/Patching%20mean%20time%20to%20resolution%20via%20PR + tags: + - patching + - metrics + - vmm-measurements + Fix rate per repo/product: + uuid: cf0d600e-114d-4887-9059-d81c53805f0d + risk: "Not communicating how many applications are adhering to SLAs based on + the criticality of vulnerabilities can lead to delayed remediation of \ncritical + security issues, increasing the risk of exploitation and potential damage + to the organization." + measure: "Measurement and communication of the number of vulnerabilities handled + per severity level for components such as applications, ensuring alignment + with SLAs. \nThe rate should be broken down by team, product, application, + repository, and/or service. This analysis should be conducted at least quarterly." + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: 227d786c-dd76-4b81-b0b2-62389ab8f0fb + name: OWASP DefectDojo + tags: + - vulnerability management system + - owasp + url: https://github.com/DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo + description: | + DefectDojo is a security program and vulnerability management tool. DefectDojo allows you to manage your application security program, maintain product and application information, triage vulnerabilities and push findings into defect trackers. Consolidate your findings into one source of truth with DefectDojo. + - uuid: d2eb592d-c9b5-4c39-bff7-bb313a58e3a9 + name: Purify + tags: + - vulnerability management system + url: https://github.com/faloker/purify/ + description: | + The goal of Purify to be an easy-in-use and efficient tool to simplify a workflow of managing vulnerabilities delivered from various (even custom) tools. + - uuid: 3b99799c-e875-4cc2-aad7-5ce4564a1cde + name: Business friendly vulnerability management metrics + url: https://medium.com/uber-security-privacy/business-friendly-vulnerability-management-metrics-cfd702fd7705 + test-url-expects: + - 403 + tags: + - documentation + - vulnerability + - vulnerability management system + - uuid: 7ec30b0e-9681-427a-80ee-ab811d9e476f + name: DefectDojo Client + tags: + - Defectdojo + - statistics + url: https://github.com/SDA-SE/defectdojo-client + description: | + This projects contains the DefectDojo upload client and statistics client. It is for example used within the ClusterImageScanner. + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-B-2 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.25 + - 5.12 + - 5.13 + - 5.1 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Test%20KPI/subsection/Fix%20rate%20per%20repo%2Fproduct + tags: + - vulnerability-mgmt + - metrics + - vmm-measurements + Generation of response statistics: + uuid: c922981b-65ed-40f3-a947-96fee9a0125f + risk: No or delayed reaction to findings leads to potential exploitation of + findings. + measure: Creation and response statistics (e.g. Mean Time to Resolution) of + findings. This is also referred to as _Mean Time to Resolve_. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + dependsOn: + - 85ba5623-84be-4219-8892-808837be582d # Usage of a vulnerability management system + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: 227d786c-dd76-4b81-b0b2-62389ab8f0fb + name: OWASP DefectDojo + tags: + - vulnerability management system + - owasp + url: https://github.com/DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo + description: | + DefectDojo is a security program and vulnerability management tool. DefectDojo allows you to manage your application security program, maintain product and application information, triage vulnerabilities and push findings into defect trackers. Consolidate your findings into one source of truth with DefectDojo. + - uuid: d2eb592d-c9b5-4c39-bff7-bb313a58e3a9 + name: Purify + tags: + - vulnerability management system + url: https://github.com/faloker/purify/ + description: | + The goal of Purify to be an easy-in-use and efficient tool to simplify a workflow of managing vulnerabilities delivered from various (even custom) tools. + - uuid: 3b99799c-e875-4cc2-aad7-5ce4564a1cde + name: Business friendly vulnerability management metrics + url: https://medium.com/uber-security-privacy/business-friendly-vulnerability-management-metrics-cfd702fd7705 + test-url-expects: + - 403 + tags: + - documentation + - vulnerability + - vulnerability management system + - uuid: 7ec30b0e-9681-427a-80ee-ab811d9e476f + name: DefectDojo Client + tags: + - Defectdojo + - statistics + url: https://github.com/SDA-SE/defectdojo-client + description: | + This projects contains the DefectDojo upload client and statistics client. It is for example used within the ClusterImageScanner. + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-B-2 + - I-SB-B-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 16.1.4 + - 8.2.3 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.25 + - 5.1 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Test%20KPI/subsection/Generation%20of%20response%20statistics + tags: + - vulnerability-mgmt + - metrics + - vmm-measurements + comments: The [DefectDojo-Client](https://github.com/SDA-SE/defectdojo-client/tree/master/statistic-client) + generates statistics from OWASP DefectDojo and places the results in a [Github + repository](https://github.com/pagel-pro/cluster-image-scanner-all-results). + SLA per criticality: + uuid: 51f3fce5-b5c8-4683-8c41-e785fe4f3b5f + risk: "Not communicating how many applications are adhering to SLAs based on + the criticality of vulnerabilities can lead to delayed remediation of \ncritical + security issues, increasing the risk of exploitation and potential damage + to the organization." + measure: "Measurement and communication of how many of the vulnerabilities handling + per severity for components like applications are aligned to SLAs. \nThis + is performed for the hole organization and doesn't need to be broken down + (yet) on team/product/application. \nAt least quarterly." + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + dependsOn: [] + implementation: + - uuid: 227d786c-dd76-4b81-b0b2-62389ab8f0fb + name: OWASP DefectDojo + tags: + - vulnerability management system + - owasp + url: https://github.com/DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo + description: | + DefectDojo is a security program and vulnerability management tool. DefectDojo allows you to manage your application security program, maintain product and application information, triage vulnerabilities and push findings into defect trackers. Consolidate your findings into one source of truth with DefectDojo. + - uuid: d2eb592d-c9b5-4c39-bff7-bb313a58e3a9 + name: Purify + tags: + - vulnerability management system + url: https://github.com/faloker/purify/ + description: | + The goal of Purify to be an easy-in-use and efficient tool to simplify a workflow of managing vulnerabilities delivered from various (even custom) tools. + - uuid: 3b99799c-e875-4cc2-aad7-5ce4564a1cde + name: Business friendly vulnerability management metrics + url: https://medium.com/uber-security-privacy/business-friendly-vulnerability-management-metrics-cfd702fd7705 + test-url-expects: + - 403 + tags: + - documentation + - vulnerability + - vulnerability management system + - uuid: 7ec30b0e-9681-427a-80ee-ab811d9e476f + name: DefectDojo Client + tags: + - Defectdojo + - statistics + url: https://github.com/SDA-SE/defectdojo-client + description: | + This projects contains the DefectDojo upload client and statistics client. It is for example used within the ClusterImageScanner. + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-B-2 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.25 + - 5.12 + - 5.13 + - 5.1 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Test%20KPI/subsection/SLA%20per%20criticality + tags: + - vulnerability-mgmt + - metrics + - vmm-measurements + Patching mean time to resolution via production: + uuid: 77ffc53e-9f3d-41f4-92d3-02f04f9b6b0f + risk: Without measuring Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR) related to patching, + it is challenging to identify delays in the patching process. Unaddressed + vulnerabilities can be exploited by attackers, leading to potential security + breaches and data loss. + measure: |- + Measurement and communication of the time from the availability of a patch to its deployment in production in alignment with Service Level Agreements (SLAs), conducted at least on a quarterly basis. + Average time to patch is visualized per component/project/team. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 4 + dependsOn: + - 86d490b9-d798-4a5b-a011-ab9688014c46 # Patching mean time to resolution via PR + - 8ae0b92c-10e0-4602-ba22-7524d6aed488 # Automated PRs for patches + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 16.1.4 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.25 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Test%20KPI/subsection/Patching%20mean%20time%20to%20resolution%20via%20production + tags: + - patching + - metrics + - vmm-measurements +Test and Verification: + Application tests: + Security unit tests for important components: + uuid: eb2c7f9d-d0bd-4253-a2ba-cff2ace4a075 + risk: Vulnerabilities are rising due to code changes. + measure: Usage of unit tests to test important security related features like + authentication and authorization. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 4 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + comments: | + The integration of module tests takes place during development instead, it highlights vulnerabilities in sub-routines, functions, modules, libraries etc. checked. + A sample implementation of unit tests are explained in the video [Shift-Left-Security with the Security Test Pyramid - Andreas Falk](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzFZy3f7d8E) starting with minute 9. + implementation: + - uuid: cc2eec82-f3a7-4ae5-9ccb-3d75352b2e4d + name: JUnit + tags: + - unittest + url: https://junit.org/ + - uuid: fd56720a-ad4b-487c-b4c3-897a688672c4 + name: Karma + tags: [] + url: https://karma-runner.github.io + references: + samm2: + - V-RT-A-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 14.2.3 + - 14.2.8 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.32 + - 8.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Application%20tests/subsection/Security%20unit%20tests%20for%20important%20components + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + tags: + - none + Security integration tests for important components: + uuid: f57d55f2-dc05-4b34-9d1f-f8ce5bfb0715 + risk: Vulnerabilities are rising due to code changes in a complex microservice + environment. + measure: Implementation of essential security related integration tests. For + example for authentication and authorization. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 4 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 2 + level: 3 + references: + samm2: + - V-RT-A-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 14.2.3 + - 14.2.8 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.32 + - 8.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Application%20tests/subsection/Security%20integration%20tests%20for%20important%20components + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Smoke Test: + uuid: 73aaae0b-5d68-4953-9fa4-fd25bf665f2a + risk: During a deployment an error might happen which leads to non-availability + of the system, a part of the system or a feature. + measure: Integration tests are performed against the production environment + after each deployment. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 2 + level: 4 + implementation: [] + dependsOn: + - 67e1a9aa-9fbf-4ec5-a2de-400f01960c51 # Automated deployment process + references: + samm2: + - V-RT-A-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 14.2.3 + - 14.2.8 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.32 + - 8.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Application%20tests/subsection/Smoke%20Test + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + High coverage of security related module and integration tests: + uuid: 67667c97-c33e-4306-a4e5-e7b1d8e10c5a + risk: Vulnerabilities are rising due to code changes in a complex microservice + environment in not important components. + measure: Implementation of security related tests via unit tests and integration + tests. Including the test of libraries, in case the are not tested already. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 5 + time: 5 + resources: 3 + usefulness: 3 + level: 5 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - V-RT-B-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 14.2.3 + - 14.2.8 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.32 + - 8.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Application%20tests/subsection/High%20coverage%20of%20security%20related%20module%20and%20integration%20tests + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Consolidation: + Simple false positive treatment: + uuid: c1acc8af-312e-4503-a817-a26220c993a0 + description: | + Security tests may produce false positives (or _"false alarms"_), findings that are incorrectly identified as vulnerabilities. + + It is important distinguish these from true positive vulnerabilities to avoid wasting time and resources on non-issues. + + False positive treatment ensures that findings from security tests are triaged and documented, allowing teams to distinguish between real vulnerabilities and false positives. This reduces unnecessary work and helps maintain focus on true risks. + + Some positive findings might be considered an _accepted risk_ by the organization. This must also be documented. + risk: | + If false positives are not managed, teams may ignore all findings, leading to real vulnerabilities being overlooked and increasing the risk of exploitation. Specially, if tests are automated an run daily. + measure: | + Findings from security tests must be triaged and outcomes persisted/documented to: + - Prevent re-analysis of known issues in subsequent test runs + - Track accepted risks vs false positives + - Enable consistent decision-making across teams + + At this maturity level, a simple tracking system suffices - tools need only distinguish between "triaged" and "untriaged" findings, without complex categorization. Some tools refer to this as "suppression" of findings. + + Samples for false positive handling: + - [OWASP Dependency Check](https://jeremylong.github.io/DependencyCheck/general/suppression.html) + - [Kubescape with VEX](https://kubescape.io/blog/2023/12/07/kubescape-support-for-vex-generation/) + - [OWASP DefectDojo Risk Acceptance](https://docs.defectdojo.com/en/working_with_findings/findings_workflows/risk_acceptances/) and [False Positive Handling](https://docs.defectdojo.com/en/working_with_findings/intro_to_findings/#triage-vulnerabilities-using-finding-status) + assessment: | + A process is defined for triaging and documenting false positives and accepted risks + level: 1 + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + implementation: + - uuid: 227d786c-dd76-4b81-b0b2-62389ab8f0fb + name: OWASP DefectDojo + tags: + - vulnerability management system + - owasp + url: https://github.com/DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo + description: | + DefectDojo is a security program and vulnerability management tool. DefectDojo allows you to manage your application security program, maintain product and application information, triage vulnerabilities and push findings into defect trackers. Consolidate your findings into one source of truth with DefectDojo. + - uuid: d2eb592d-c9b5-4c39-bff7-bb313a58e3a9 + name: Purify + tags: + - vulnerability management system + url: https://github.com/faloker/purify/ + description: | + The goal of Purify to be an easy-in-use and efficient tool to simplify a workflow of managing vulnerabilities delivered from various (even custom) tools. + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 16.1.6 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 5.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Consolidation/subsection/Simple%20false%20positive%20treatment + isImplemented: false + tags: + - false-positive + - defect-management + - scanning + - sca + - sats + - dast + evidence: "" + comments: "" + Treatment of defects with high or critical severity: + uuid: 44f2c8a9-4aaa-4c72-942d-63f78b89f385 + description: | + All security problems that are rated as "high" or "critical" must be fixed before the software can be released or used in production. This means that if a serious vulnerability is found, it cannot be ignored or postponed. + risk: | + If serious security problems are not fixed, attackers could exploit them to steal data, disrupt services, or cause other harm. Ignoring these issues puts the organization, its customers, and its reputation at risk. + measure: | + - Make it a rule that all _high_ or _critical_ security findings must be fixed before the software is approved for release or use. + - Track these issues and make sure they are resolved quickly. + assessment: | + - Provide evidence that vulnerabilities are treated within the defined time frame in production. For example via the DSOMM activity [Number of vulnerabilities/severity](./activity-description?uuid=bc548cba-cb82-4f76-bd4b-325d9d256279) or [Patching mean time to resolution via PR](./activity-description?uuid=86d490b9-d798-4a5b-a011-ab9688014c46) with extra deployment statistics. + comments: False positive analysis, specially for static analysis, is time consuming. + level: 1 + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 16.1.4 + - 12.6.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + - 5.25 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Consolidation/subsection/Treatment%20of%20defects%20with%20high%20or%20critical%20severity + implementation: + - uuid: 7f500e95-2110-44c4-a1f8-cd7ef5d9eb6b + name: Trivy + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy + - uuid: 7970af6e-a7d3-4359-a6ea-301d26b16329 + name: Grype + tags: + - sbom + - dependency + - vulnerability + url: https://github.com/anchore/grype + tags: + - vuln-action + - defect-management + evidence: "" + Artifact-based false positive treatment: + uuid: 8f2b4d5a-3c1e-4b7a-9d8f-2e6c4a1b5d7f + risk: Without artifact-specific false positive handling, teams must repeatedly + triage the same findings across different versions or deployments of the same + component, leading to inefficient use of security resources. + measure: "Implement false positive marking and temporary acceptance of findings + \nbased on specific artifacts (applications, components, or repositories).\nThis + allows teams to suppress findings for specific versions or builds\nwhile maintaining + visibility for future releases." + description: |- + Artifact-based false positive treatment enables more granular control + over finding suppression by linking decisions to specific code artifacts, + container images, or application versions. This approach helps maintain + security oversight while reducing repeated analysis overhead. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + dependsOn: + - c1acc8af-312e-4503-a817-a26220c993a0 # Simple false positive treatment + implementation: + - uuid: 227d786c-dd76-4b81-b0b2-62389ab8f0fb + name: OWASP DefectDojo + tags: + - vulnerability management system + - owasp + url: https://github.com/DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo + description: | + DefectDojo is a security program and vulnerability management tool. DefectDojo allows you to manage your application security program, maintain product and application information, triage vulnerabilities and push findings into defect trackers. Consolidate your findings into one source of truth with DefectDojo. + - uuid: d2eb592d-c9b5-4c39-bff7-bb313a58e3a9 + name: Purify + tags: + - vulnerability management system + url: https://github.com/faloker/purify/ + description: | + The goal of Purify to be an easy-in-use and efficient tool to simplify a workflow of managing vulnerabilities delivered from various (even custom) tools. + - uuid: 500399bd-7dfc-47fd-99d8-b55cefb760a9 + name: Dependency-Track + description: | + Dependency-Track is an intelligent Component Analysis platform that allows organizations to identify and reduce risk in the software supply chain. Dependency-Track takes a unique and highly beneficial approach by leveraging the capabilities of Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). + url: https://github.com/DependencyTrack/dependency-track + tags: + - sca + - inventory + - OpenSource + - Supply Chain + - vulnerability + - inventory + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-A-2 + - I-DM-B-2 + - I-SB-B-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 16.1.4 + - 16.1.6 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.25 + - 5.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Consolidation/subsection/Artifact-based%20false%20positive%20treatment + tags: + - false-positive + - defect-management + - scanning + - sca + - sats + - dast + Simple visualization of defects: + uuid: 55f4c916-3a34-474d-ad96-9a9f7a4f6a83 + risk: The security level of a component is not visible. Therefore, the motivation + to enhance the security is not give. + measure: Vulnerabilities are simple visualized. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: 06334caf-8be6-487a-96b1-d41c7ed5f207 + name: OWASP Dependency Check + tags: + - OpenSource + - Supply Chain + - vulnerability + url: https://owasp.org/www-project-dependency-check/ + - uuid: 500399bd-7dfc-47fd-99d8-b55cefb760a9 + name: Dependency-Track + description: | + Dependency-Track is an intelligent Component Analysis platform that allows organizations to identify and reduce risk in the software supply chain. Dependency-Track takes a unique and highly beneficial approach by leveraging the capabilities of Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). + url: https://github.com/DependencyTrack/dependency-track + tags: + - sca + - inventory + - OpenSource + - Supply Chain + - vulnerability + - inventory + - uuid: ef80cd34-d3ba-4406-a4fa-4cf6f30c2e81 + name: LogParser Jenkins Plugins + tags: [] + - uuid: 227d786c-dd76-4b81-b0b2-62389ab8f0fb + name: OWASP DefectDojo + tags: + - vulnerability management system + - owasp + url: https://github.com/DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo + description: | + DefectDojo is a security program and vulnerability management tool. DefectDojo allows you to manage your application security program, maintain product and application information, triage vulnerabilities and push findings into defect trackers. Consolidate your findings into one source of truth with DefectDojo. + - uuid: d2eb592d-c9b5-4c39-bff7-bb313a58e3a9 + name: Purify + tags: + - vulnerability management system + url: https://github.com/faloker/purify/ + description: | + The goal of Purify to be an easy-in-use and efficient tool to simplify a workflow of managing vulnerabilities delivered from various (even custom) tools. + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 16.1.4 + - 8.2.1 + - 8.2.2 + - 8.2.3 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.25 + - 5.12 + - 5.13 + - 5.1 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Consolidation/subsection/Simple%20visualization%20of%20defects + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Fix based on accessibility: + uuid: 0c10a7f7-f78f-49f2-943d-19fdef248fed + risk: Overwhelming volume of security findings from automated testing tools. + This might lead to ignorance of findings. + measure: Implement a simple risk-based prioritization framework for vulnerability + remediation based on accessibility of the applications. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 3 + meta: + implementationGuide: |- + Develop a scoring system for asset accessibility, considering factors like: + - Whether the asset is internet-facing (highly recommended) + - The number of network hops required to reach the asset (recommended) + - Authentication requirements for access (recommended) + dependsOn: + - 44f2c8a9-4aaa-4c72-942d-63f78b89f385 # Treatment of defects with high or critical severity + - 2a44b708-734f-4463-b0cb-86dc46344b2f # Inventory of production components + implementation: ~ + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-A-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 16.1.4 + - 8.2.1 + - 8.2.2 + - 8.2.3 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.25 + - 5.12 + - 5.13 + - 5.1 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Consolidation/subsection/Fix%20based%20on%20accessibility + tags: + - vuln-action + - defect-management + Global false positive treatment: + uuid: 9e3a7c2f-1b4d-4e8a-a5c6-7f2b9d1e3a8c + risk: Without centralized false positive management across environments, organizations + face inconsistent security decisions, duplicated analysis efforts, and potential + security gaps when the same findings are handled differently across applications + and teams. + measure: "Implement global false positive and acceptance management that applies + \nconsistently across all applications. This enables organization-wide security + decisions and reduces redundant \nanalysis of common false positives." + description: "Global false positive treatment allows (security) teams to make + \norganization-wide decisions about specific vulnerabilities or finding \npatterns. + When a finding is marked as a false positive or temporarily \naccepted at + the global level, this decision automatically applies to \nall applications + in the specified environment, ensuring consistency \nand operational efficiency." + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + level: 3 + dependsOn: + - 8f2b4d5a-3c1e-4b7a-9d8f-2e6c4a1b5d7f # Artifact-based false positive treatment + - 85ba5623-84be-4219-8892-808837be582d # Usage of a vulnerability management system + implementation: ~ + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-B-2 + - I-DM-A-3 + - I-SB-B-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 16.1.3 + - 16.1.4 + - 16.1.6 + iso27001-2022: + - 6.8 + - 5.25 + - 5.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Consolidation/subsection/Global%20false%20positive%20treatment + tags: + - false-positive + - defect-management + Integration in development process: + uuid: aaffa73f-59f6-4267-b0ab-732f3d13e90d + risk: "Not integrating vulnerability handling into the development process may + result in product teams ignoring findings. \n\nSecurity joke: We will gain + 100% false negatives." + measure: Integration of findings into the development process. E.g. adding findings + to the backlog of products teams. + description: |- + Validating Findings by Security Engineers Pros: + - Ensures accuracy and relevance of findings before they reach product teams + - Reduces false positives, saving development teams time and effort + - Might provides a layer of expertise in assessing the severity and impact of vulnerabilities + + Validating Findings by Security Engineers Cons: + - Requires a sufficient number of skilled security engineers, which might be challenging for some organizations + - May slow down the process if security engineers are overloaded with validation tasks + - For Software Composition Analysis findings (known vulnerabilities) I, as a sec. eng., struggle to analysis if it is a false positive/true positive due to a lack of insights in the application + + Pushing Findings Directly to Product Teams Pros: + - Accelerates the process by immediately notifying product teams of potential vulnerabilities + - Empowers product teams to take swift action in addressing security issues + Pushing Findings Directly to Product Teams Cons: + - Increases the workload on product teams, potentially leading to frustration + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + dependsOn: [] + implementation: + - uuid: 889444eb-de68-4367-bada-a66f8cb9733a + name: Jira + tags: + - documentation + - issue + - proprietary + url: https://jira.atlassian.com/ + description: Jira is a bug tracking and project management tool developed + by Atlassian, used by development teams for tracking issues, planning sprints, + and managing software releases. It offers features for creating and managing + tasks, assigning them to team members, and monitoring progress through customizable + workflows and dashboards. + - uuid: 227d786c-dd76-4b81-b0b2-62389ab8f0fb + name: OWASP DefectDojo + tags: + - vulnerability management system + - owasp + url: https://github.com/DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo + description: | + DefectDojo is a security program and vulnerability management tool. DefectDojo allows you to manage your application security program, maintain product and application information, triage vulnerabilities and push findings into defect trackers. Consolidate your findings into one source of truth with DefectDojo. + - uuid: d2eb592d-c9b5-4c39-bff7-bb313a58e3a9 + name: Purify + tags: + - vulnerability management system + url: https://github.com/faloker/purify/ + description: | + The goal of Purify to be an easy-in-use and efficient tool to simplify a workflow of managing vulnerabilities delivered from various (even custom) tools. + - uuid: 7ec30b0e-9681-427a-80ee-ab811d9e476f + name: DefectDojo Client + tags: + - Defectdojo + - statistics + url: https://github.com/SDA-SE/defectdojo-client + description: | + This projects contains the DefectDojo upload client and statistics client. It is for example used within the ClusterImageScanner. + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-A-2 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.25 + - 5.12 + - 5.13 + - 5.1 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Consolidation/subsection/Integration%20in%20development%20process + tags: + - vulnerability-mgmt + - vmm-measurements + Integration of vulnerability issues into the development process: + uuid: ce970c9b-da94-41cf-bd78-8c15357b7e8e + risk: To read console output of the build server to search for vulnerabilities + might be difficult. Also, to check a vulnerability management system might + not be a daily task for a developer. + measure: Vulnerabilities are tracked in the teams issue system (e.g. jira). + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 2 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: aaad322e-806e-4c51-b78d-6551f7dc376a + name: SAST + tags: [] + description: 'At SAST (Static Application Security Testing): Server-side / + client-side teams can easily be recorded. With microservice architecture + individual microservices can be used usually Teams.' + url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/dao/artifact/d3f:StaticAnalysisTool/ + - uuid: 9d4bd377-11ec-4054-9c9e-9bfb99ac9609 + name: DAST + tags: [] + description: 'At DAST (Dynamic Application Security Testing): vulnerabilities + are classified and can be assigned to server-side and client-side teams.' + url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/dao/artifact/d3f:DynamicAnalysisTool/ + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 16.1.4 + - 16.1.5 + - 16.1.6 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 5.25 + - 5.26 + - 5.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Consolidation/subsection/Integration%20of%20vulnerability%20issues%20into%20the%20development%20process + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Treatment of defects per protection requirement: + uuid: 2b7cc923-bdaf-43e3-8fb4-a995b7783969 + risk: "Not defining the protection requirement of applications can lead to wrong + prioritization, delayed remediation of \ncritical security issues, increasing + the risk of exploitation and potential damage to the organization." + measure: "Defining the protection requirement and the corresponding handling + of vulnerabilities per severity for components like applications are aligned + to SLAs. \n This is performed for the hole organization and doesn't need to + be broken down (yet) on team/product/application. \n At least quarterly." + description: |- + The protection requirements for an application should consider: + - Data criticality + - Application accessibility (internal vs. external) + - Regulatory compliance + - Other relevant factors + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + dependsOn: [] + implementation: + - uuid: 227d786c-dd76-4b81-b0b2-62389ab8f0fb + name: OWASP DefectDojo + tags: + - vulnerability management system + - owasp + url: https://github.com/DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo + description: | + DefectDojo is a security program and vulnerability management tool. DefectDojo allows you to manage your application security program, maintain product and application information, triage vulnerabilities and push findings into defect trackers. Consolidate your findings into one source of truth with DefectDojo. + - uuid: d2eb592d-c9b5-4c39-bff7-bb313a58e3a9 + name: Purify + tags: + - vulnerability management system + url: https://github.com/faloker/purify/ + description: | + The goal of Purify to be an easy-in-use and efficient tool to simplify a workflow of managing vulnerabilities delivered from various (even custom) tools. + - uuid: 3b99799c-e875-4cc2-aad7-5ce4564a1cde + name: Business friendly vulnerability management metrics + url: https://medium.com/uber-security-privacy/business-friendly-vulnerability-management-metrics-cfd702fd7705 + test-url-expects: + - 403 + tags: + - documentation + - vulnerability + - vulnerability management system + - uuid: 7ec30b0e-9681-427a-80ee-ab811d9e476f + name: DefectDojo Client + tags: + - Defectdojo + - statistics + url: https://github.com/SDA-SE/defectdojo-client + description: | + This projects contains the DefectDojo upload client and statistics client. It is for example used within the ClusterImageScanner. + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-A-2 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.25 + - 5.12 + - 5.13 + - 5.1 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Consolidation/subsection/Treatment%20of%20defects%20per%20protection%20requirement + tags: + - vulnerability-mgmt + - metrics + - vmm-measurements + Treatment of defects with medium severity: + uuid: 9cac3341-fe83-4079-bef2-bfc4279eb594 + risk: Vulnerabilities with severity middle are not visible. + measure: Vulnerabilities with severity middle are added to the quality gate. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + comments: False positive analysis, specially for static analysis, is time consuming. + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 16.1.4 + - 12.6.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + - 5.25 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Consolidation/subsection/Treatment%20of%20defects%20with%20medium%20severity + implementation: [] + tags: + - vuln-action + - defect-management + Usage of a vulnerability management system: + uuid: 85ba5623-84be-4219-8892-808837be582d + risk: Maintenance of false positives in each tool enforces a high workload. + In addition a correlation of the same finding from different tools is not + possible. + measure: Aggregation of vulnerabilities in one tool reduce the workload to handle + them, e.g. mark as false positives. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 2 + dependsOn: + - f2f0f274-c1a0-4501-92fe-7fc4452bc8ad # Exploit likelihood estimation + - 6217fe11-5ed7-4cf4-9de4-555bcfa6fe87 # Each team has a security champion + - 185d5a74-19dc-4422-be07-44ea35226783 # Office Hours + level: 3 + description: "For known vulnerabilities a processes to estimate the exploit + ability of a vulnerability is recommended.\n\nTo implement a security culture + including training, office hours and security champions can help integrating + \nsecurity scanning at scale. Such activities help to understand why a vulnerability + is potentially critical and needs handling." + implementation: + - uuid: 227d786c-dd76-4b81-b0b2-62389ab8f0fb + name: OWASP DefectDojo + tags: + - vulnerability management system + - owasp + url: https://github.com/DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo + description: | + DefectDojo is a security program and vulnerability management tool. DefectDojo allows you to manage your application security program, maintain product and application information, triage vulnerabilities and push findings into defect trackers. Consolidate your findings into one source of truth with DefectDojo. + - uuid: d2eb592d-c9b5-4c39-bff7-bb313a58e3a9 + name: Purify + tags: + - vulnerability management system + url: https://github.com/faloker/purify/ + description: | + The goal of Purify to be an easy-in-use and efficient tool to simplify a workflow of managing vulnerabilities delivered from various (even custom) tools. + - uuid: d899488c-5799-4df1-a14c-3bb92fec3ac3 + name: SecObserve + tags: + - vulnerability management system + url: https://github.com/SecObserve/SecObserve + description: | + SecObserve is an open source vulnerability and license management system for software development teams and cloud environments. It supports a variety of open source vulnerability scanners and integrates into CI/CD pipelines. + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-A-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + - 16.1.3 + - 16.1.4 + - 16.1.5 + - 16.1.6 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + - 6.8 + - 5.25 + - 5.26 + - 5.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Consolidation/subsection/Usage%20of%20a%20vulnerability%20management%20system + tags: + - none + Advanced visualization of defects: + uuid: 7a82020c-94d1-471c-bbd3-5f7fe7df4876 + risk: Correlation of the vulnerabilities of different tools to have an overview + of the the overall security level per component/project/team is not given. + measure: Findings are visualized per component/project/team. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 4 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 2 + level: 4 + implementation: + - uuid: 227d786c-dd76-4b81-b0b2-62389ab8f0fb + name: OWASP DefectDojo + tags: + - vulnerability management system + - owasp + url: https://github.com/DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo + description: | + DefectDojo is a security program and vulnerability management tool. DefectDojo allows you to manage your application security program, maintain product and application information, triage vulnerabilities and push findings into defect trackers. Consolidate your findings into one source of truth with DefectDojo. + - uuid: d2eb592d-c9b5-4c39-bff7-bb313a58e3a9 + name: Purify + tags: + - vulnerability management system + url: https://github.com/faloker/purify/ + description: | + The goal of Purify to be an easy-in-use and efficient tool to simplify a workflow of managing vulnerabilities delivered from various (even custom) tools. + - uuid: 3b99799c-e875-4cc2-aad7-5ce4564a1cde + name: Business friendly vulnerability management metrics + url: https://medium.com/uber-security-privacy/business-friendly-vulnerability-management-metrics-cfd702fd7705 + test-url-expects: + - 403 + tags: + - documentation + - vulnerability + - vulnerability management system + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-A-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 16.1.4 + - 8.2.1 + - 8.2.2 + - 8.2.3 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.25 + - 5.12 + - 5.13 + - 5.1 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Consolidation/subsection/Advanced%20visualization%20of%20defects + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Reproducible defect tickets: + uuid: 27337442-e4b1-4e87-8dc9-ce86fbb79a39 + risk: Vulnerability descriptions are hard to understand by staff from operations + and development. + measure: Vulnerabilities include the test procedure to give the staff from operations + and development the ability to reproduce vulnerabilities. This enhances the + understanding of vulnerabilities and therefore the fix have a higher quality. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 2 + level: 4 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 16.1.4 + - 8.2.1 + - 8.2.2 + - 8.2.3 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.25 + - 5.12 + - 5.13 + - 5.1 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Consolidation/subsection/Reproducible%20defect%20tickets + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Treatment of all defects: + uuid: b2f77606-3e6c-41e9-b72d-7c0b1d3d581d + risk: Vulnerabilities with severity low are not visible. + measure: All vulnerabilities are added to the quality gate. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 4 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 2 + level: 5 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - I-DM-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 16.1.4 + - 12.6.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + - 5.25 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Consolidation/subsection/Treatment%20of%20all%20defects + tags: + - vuln-action + - defect-management + comments: "" + Dynamic depth for applications: + Coverage of client side dynamic components: + uuid: 9711f871-f79d-4573-8d4f-d2c98fd0d18e + risk: Parts of the service are not covered during the scan, because JavaScript + is not getting executed. Therefore, the coverage of client-side dynamic components + is limited, leading to potential security risks and undetected vulnerabilities. + measure: Usage of a spider which executes dynamic content like JavaScript, e.g. + via Selenium. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 2 + dependsOn: + - 65a2d7d9-5441-46bf-a4e3-f76919857750 # Usage of different roles + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 14.2.3 + - 14.2.8 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.32 + - 8.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Dynamic%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Coverage%20of%20client%20side%20dynamic%20components + implementation: + - uuid: 6583fd5f-4314-4b39-9265-de72f861c8cb + name: Ajax Spider + tags: [] + url: https://www.zaproxy.org/docs/desktop/addons/ajax-spider/ + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Simple Scan: + uuid: 07796811-37f9-467c-9ff2-48f346e77ff3 + risk: Deficient security tests are performed. Simple vulnerabilities are not + detected and missing security configurations (e.g. headers) are not set. Fast + feedback is not given. + measure: A simple scan is performed to get a security baseline. In case the + test is done in under 10 minutes, it should be part of the build and deployment + process. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 1 + level: 2 + dependsOn: + - f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b # Defined build process + implementation: + - uuid: 42a87524-ec35-4de2-a30c-1a7c7d045801 + name: OWASP Zap + tags: + - vulnerability + - scanner + url: https://github.com/zaproxy/zaproxy + description: | + The OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is one of the world's most popular free security tools and is actively maintained by a dedicated international team of ... + - uuid: 83ae1e92-5eb9-4467-b3d3-fd2f96e6ab63 + name: Arachni + url: https://github.com/Arachni/arachni + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 14.2.3 + - 14.2.8 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.32 + - 8.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Dynamic%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Simple%20Scan + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Usage of different roles: + uuid: 65a2d7d9-5441-46bf-a4e3-f76919857750 + risk: Parts of the service are not covered during the scan, because a login + is not performed. + measure: Integration of authentication with all roles used in the service. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 2 + level: 2 + dependsOn: + - 07796811-37f9-467c-9ff2-48f346e77ff3 # Simple Scan + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 14.2.3 + - 14.2.8 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.32 + - 8.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Dynamic%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Usage%20of%20different%20roles + implementation: + - uuid: 7eb37566-02d5-4fff-8dcf-8fcd1c8197f3 + name: Zest + url: https://www.zaproxy.org/docs/desktop/addons/zest/ + tags: + - zap + description: | + Zest is an experimental specialized scripting language (also known as a domain-specific language) originally developed by the Mozilla security team and is intended to be used in web oriented security tools. + isImplemented: false + assessment: For REST APIs, multiple OAuth2 scopes are used. + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Coverage of hidden endpoints: + uuid: 6a9cb303-0f98-48a8-bdcd-56d41c0012b8 + risk: Hidden endpoints of the service are not getting tracked. + measure: Hidden endpoints are getting detected and included in the vulnerability + scan. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 5 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: f2a5f642-43b3-4b2c-97d5-b14d5964981b + name: cURL + tags: [] + url: https://curl.se/ + - uuid: 7ce77258-bf65-4e7a-9627-daf765ee1d77 + name: OpenAPI Specifications + tags: [] + url: https://spec.openapis.org/ + - uuid: 42a87524-ec35-4de2-a30c-1a7c7d045801 + name: OWASP Zap + tags: + - vulnerability + - scanner + url: https://github.com/zaproxy/zaproxy + description: | + The OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is one of the world's most popular free security tools and is actively maintained by a dedicated international team of ... + - uuid: c9bbecf2-567b-4422-b29a-67b16385f32b + name: Schemathesis + tags: + - testing + - api + - documentation + url: https://github.com/schemathesis/schemathesis + description: | + Schemathesis is a tool for testing web applications and services by sending requests based on the Open API / Swagger schema. + dependsOn: + - 65a2d7d9-5441-46bf-a4e3-f76919857750 # Usage of different roles + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + iso27001-2022: + - ISO 27001:2022 mapping is missing + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Dynamic%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Coverage%20of%20hidden%20endpoints + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Coverage of more input vectors: + uuid: 5e0ff85b-ec89-4ef0-96b1-5695fa0025dc + risk: Parts of the service are not covered. For example specially formatted + or coded parameters are not getting detected as parameter (e.g. parameters + in REST-like URLs, parameters in JSON-Format or base64-coded parameters). + measure: Special parameter and special encodings are defined, so that they get + fuzzed by the used vulnerability scanners. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 5 + time: 5 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 3 + dependsOn: + - 65a2d7d9-5441-46bf-a4e3-f76919857750 # Usage of different roles + references: + samm2: + - V-RT-B-1 + iso27001-2017: + - not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + iso27001-2022: + - ISO 27001:2022 mapping is missing + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Dynamic%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Coverage%20of%20more%20input%20vectors + implementation: + - uuid: c9bbecf2-567b-4422-b29a-67b16385f32b + name: Schemathesis + tags: + - testing + - api + - documentation + url: https://github.com/schemathesis/schemathesis + description: | + Schemathesis is a tool for testing web applications and services by sending requests based on the Open API / Swagger schema. + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Coverage of sequential operations: + uuid: 845f06ec-148c-4c67-9755-7041911dcca5 + risk: Sequential operations like workflows (e.g. login -> put products in the + basket + measure: Sequential operations are defined and checked by the vulnerability + scanner in the defined order. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 5 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: f2a5f642-43b3-4b2c-97d5-b14d5964981b + name: cURL + tags: [] + url: https://curl.se/ + dependsOn: + - 65a2d7d9-5441-46bf-a4e3-f76919857750 # Usage of different roles + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 14.2.8 + - 14.2.3 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.32 + - 8.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Dynamic%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Coverage%20of%20sequential%20operations + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Usage of multiple scanners: + uuid: 5b5a1eb2-113f-41fb-a3d6-06af4fdc9cea + risk: Each vulnerability scanner has different opportunities. By using just + one scanner, some vulnerabilities might not be found. + measure: Usage of multiple spiders and scanner enhance the coverage and the + vulnerabilities. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 5 + usefulness: 1 + level: 4 + dependsOn: + - 65a2d7d9-5441-46bf-a4e3-f76919857750 # Usage of different roles + implementation: + - uuid: f220b299-0917-4750-96c5-d81cd402b4df + name: OWASP secureCodeBox + tags: + - vulnerability + - scanner-orchestration + url: https://github.com/secureCodeBox/secureCodeBox + description: | + secureCodeBox is a kubernetes based, modularized toolchain for continuous security scans of your software project. Its goal is to orchestrate and easily automate a bunch of security-testing tools out of the box. + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + - 14.2.5 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + - 8.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Dynamic%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Usage%20of%20multiple%20scanners + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Coverage analysis: + uuid: d0ba0be5-c573-405f-b905-b7a8f87a9cc7 + risk: Parts of the service are not still covered by tests. + measure: Check that there are no missing paths in the application with coverage-tools. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 4 + time: 5 + resources: 3 + usefulness: 4 + level: 5 + implementation: + - uuid: 7063cf8c-cd98-480f-8ef7-11cf241d2366 + name: OWASP Code Pulse + tags: [] + url: https://owasp.org/www-project-code-pulse/ + - uuid: f011de6e-ab7c-4ec7-af55-03427271ab32 + name: Coverage.py + tags: + - testing + - coverage + url: https://github.com/coveragepy/coveragepy + description: | + Code coverage measurement for Python + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - part of periodic review, PDCA + iso27001-2022: + - ISO 27001:2022 mapping is missing + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Dynamic%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Coverage%20analysis + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Coverage of service to service communication: + uuid: 22aab0ef-76ce-4b8c-979c-3699784330db + risk: Service to service communication is not covered. + measure: Service to service communication is dumped and checked. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 4 + time: 5 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 5 + dependsOn: + - 07796811-37f9-467c-9ff2-48f346e77ff3 # Simple Scan + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 14.2.3 + - 14.2.8 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.32 + - 8.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Dynamic%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Coverage%20of%20service%20to%20service%20communication + implementation: + - uuid: 000b55f9-e6fd-4649-8290-27876a0409e2 + name: Citrus Fresh Integration Testing + tags: + - framework + - testing + url: https://citrusframework.org/ + description: Integration Test framework with focus on messaging applications + and Microservices. + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Dynamic depth for infrastructure: + Test for exposed services: + uuid: a6c4cefb-a0b7-4787-8cc7-a0f96b4b00d8 + risk: Standard network segmentation and firewalling has not been performed, + leading to world open cluster management ports. + measure: With the help of tools the network configuration of unintentional exposed + cluster(s) are tested. To identify clusters, all subdomains might need to + be identified with a tool like OWASP Amass to perform port scans based o the + result. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 2 + dependsOn: + - 4ce24abd-8ba6-494c-828d-4d193e28e4a1 # Isolated networks for virtual environments + usefulness: 2 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: 08111dc3-bdc4-47d8-8f2e-10bb50a86882 + name: nmap + tags: [] + url: https://nmap.org/ + - uuid: f085295e-46a3-4c8d-bbc3-1ac6b9dfcf2a + name: OWASP Amass + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/owasp-amass/amass + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 13.1.3 + - 14.2.3 + - 14.2.8 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.22 + - 8.32 + - 8.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Dynamic%20depth%20for%20infrastructure/subsection/Test%20for%20exposed%20services + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Test network segmentation: + uuid: 6d2c3ac6-8afc-4af6-a5e9-6188341aca01 + risk: Wrong or no network segmentation of pods makes it easier for an attacker + to access a database and extract or modify data. + measure: Cluster internal test needs to be performed. Integration of fine granulated + network segmentation (also between pods in the same namespace). + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: fffa6fb9-1fae-4852-88dc-c7086961330c + name: netassert + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/controlplaneio/netassert + dependsOn: + - 4ce24abd-8ba6-494c-828d-4d193e28e4a1 # Isolated networks for virtual environments + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 13.1.3 + - 14.2.3 + - 14.2.8 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.22 + - 8.32 + - 8.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Dynamic%20depth%20for%20infrastructure/subsection/Test%20network%20segmentation + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Test of the configuration of cloud environments: + uuid: 7bb70764-9392-4462-935d-e55b2e148199 + risk: Standard hardening practices for cloud environments are not performed + leading to vulnerabilities. + measure: With the help of tools the configuration of virtual environments are + tested. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: 893d9f37-2142-4490-996c-e43b55064d3d + name: kubescape + url: https://github.com/kubescape/kubescape + tags: + - kubernetes + - vulnerability + - misconfiguration + description: _Testing if Kubernetes is deployed securely as defined in Kubernetes + Hardening Guidance by to NSA and CISA_ + - uuid: 2af7204c-a25c-4625-9775-889978386407 + name: kube-hunter + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/aquasecurity/kube-hunter + - uuid: d45fba7d-f176-4f06-a33c-434b17ec8a8f + name: openVAS + tags: [] + url: https://www.openvas.org/ + references: + samm2: [] + iso27001-2017: + - System hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 12.6.1 + - 14.2.3 + - 14.2.8 + iso27001-2022: + - System hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.8 + - 8.32 + - 8.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Dynamic%20depth%20for%20infrastructure/subsection/Test%20of%20the%20configuration%20of%20cloud%20environments + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Test for unauthorized installation: + uuid: dccf1949-b9a8-4ce8-b992-6a4a7f3a623a + risk: Unapproved components are used. + measure: Components must be whitelisted. Regular scans on the docker infrastructure + (e.g. cluster) need to be performed, to verify that only standardized base + images are used. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: 349cf64c-abea-40bb-bd07-9c98ce648fa4 + name: 'Example: All docker images used by teams need to be based on standard + images.' + tags: [] + comments: By preventing teams from trying out new components, innovation might + be hampered + references: + samm2: [] + iso27001-2017: + - 12.5.1 + - 12.6.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.19 + - 8.8 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Dynamic%20depth%20for%20infrastructure/subsection/Test%20for%20unauthorized%20installation + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + dependsOn: + - 0de465a6-55a7-4343-af79-948bb5ff10ba # Evaluation of the trust of used components + tags: + - none + Weak password test: + uuid: 61e10f9c-e126-4ffa-af12-fdbe0d0a831f + risk: Weak passwords in components like applications or systems, specially for + privileged accounts, lead to take over of that account. + measure: Automatic brute force attacks are performed. Specially the usage of + standard accounts like 'admin' and employee user-ids is recommended. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 1 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: b99c9d52-dd1a-4aef-8699-65173cf978ce + name: HTC Hydra + tags: + - password + url: https://github.com/vanhauser-thc/thc-hydra + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 9.4.3 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.17 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Dynamic%20depth%20for%20infrastructure/subsection/Weak%20password%20test + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Load tests: + uuid: ab5725aa-4d53-47b9-96df-c14b3fa93bcd + risk: As it is unknown how many requests the systems and applications can serve, + due to an unexpected load the availability is disturbed. + measure: Load test against the production system or a production near system + is performed. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 2 + resources: 5 + usefulness: 3 + level: 4 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - V-RT-AB-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.1.3 + - 14.2.3 + - 14.2.8 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.6 + - 8.32 + - 8.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Dynamic%20depth%20for%20infrastructure/subsection/Load%20tests + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Test for unused Resources: + uuid: 6532c1fe-9d23-4228-8722-558ddabca7d4 + risk: Unused resources, specially secrets, might be still valid, but are exposing + information. As an attacker, I compromise a system, gather credentials and + try to use them. + measure: Test for unused resources helps to identify unused resources. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 2 + level: 5 + implementation: + - uuid: 8fea20ad-e332-4aa8-b1f1-aa9deb635dc1 + name: K8sPurger + tags: + - vulnerability + - scanner + - dast + - infrastructure + url: https://github.com/yogeshkk/K8sPurger + description: | + Hunt Unused Resources In Kubernetes. + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 13.1.3 + - 14.2.3 + - 14.2.8 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.22 + - 8.32 + - 8.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Dynamic%20depth%20for%20infrastructure/subsection/Test%20for%20unused%20Resources + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Static depth for applications: + Exploit likelihood estimation: + uuid: f2f0f274-c1a0-4501-92fe-7fc4452bc8ad + description: "Severity-based vulnerability triage alone generates a lot false + positives, requiring a more refined approach.\n\nUse the likelihood of exploitation + by using *known exploited vulnerabilities* (CISA KEV), or prediction models + such as \n*Exploit Prediction Scoring System* (EPSS).\n" + risk: | + Without proper prioritization, organizations may waste time and effort on low-risk vulnerabilities while neglecting critical ones. + measure: | + Use CISA KEV and EPSS to prioritize vulnerabilities that are more likely to be exploited. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 4 + level: 2 + dependsOn: + - d918cd44-a972-43e9-a974-eff3f4a5dcfe # Software Composition Analysis (server side) + implementation: + - uuid: aa507341-9531-42cd-95cf-d7b51af47086 + name: Known Exploited Vulnerabilities + tags: + - vulnerability + url: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog + description: A catalog of vulnerabilities that have been exploited. + - uuid: e39afc58-8195-4600-92c6-11922e3a141b + name: Exploit Prediction Scoring System + tags: + - vulnerability + url: https://www.first.org/epss/ + description: Estimates the likelihood that a software vulnerability will be + exploited. + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + - I-SB-B-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Exploit%20likelihood%20estimation + tags: + - none + Software Composition Analysis (server side): + uuid: d918cd44-a972-43e9-a974-eff3f4a5dcfe + description: Use a tool like trivy and concentrate on application related vulnerabilities. + At this stage, ignore vulnerabilities in container base images used in the + service. + risk: Server side components might have vulnerabilities. + measure: Tests for known vulnerabilities in server side components (e.g. backend/middleware) + are performed. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 5 + level: 2 + dependsOn: + - f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b # Defined build process + - 2a44b708-734f-4463-b0cb-86dc46344b2f # Inventory of production components + implementation: + - uuid: 06334caf-8be6-487a-96b1-d41c7ed5f207 + name: OWASP Dependency Check + tags: + - OpenSource + - Supply Chain + - vulnerability + url: https://owasp.org/www-project-dependency-check/ + - uuid: 500399bd-7dfc-47fd-99d8-b55cefb760a9 + name: Dependency-Track + description: | + Dependency-Track is an intelligent Component Analysis platform that allows organizations to identify and reduce risk in the software supply chain. Dependency-Track takes a unique and highly beneficial approach by leveraging the capabilities of Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). + url: https://github.com/DependencyTrack/dependency-track + tags: + - sca + - inventory + - OpenSource + - Supply Chain + - vulnerability + - inventory + - uuid: aa54a82c-d628-4d42-9bc8-1aa269cd91c7 + name: retire.js + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/RetireJS/retire.js/ + - uuid: 7c26484a-763c-437d-b953-d482a4fd7cf3 + name: npm audit + tags: [] + url: https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/audit + test-url-expects: + - 301 + - uuid: 5c0e817b-204e-4301-a315-2f7cc180c240 + name: Dependabot + tags: + - dependency + - dependency-management + - scm + url: https://github.com/dependabot/dependabot-core + description: | + Dependabot creates pull requests to keep your dependencies secure and up-to-date. + - uuid: 7f500e95-2110-44c4-a1f8-cd7ef5d9eb6b + name: Trivy + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + - I-SB-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Software%20Composition%20Analysis%20%28server%20side%29 + tags: + - false-positive + - defect-management + - scanning + - sca + - sats + - dast + Test for Time to Patch: + uuid: 13af1227-3dd1-4d4f-a9e9-53deb793c18f + risk: Automatic PRs for dependencies are overlooked resulting in known vulnerabilities + in production artifacts. + measure: |- + Test of the Time to Patch (e.g. based on Mean Time to Close automatic PRs) + This activity is not repeated in the Sub-Dimension "Static depth for infrastructure", but it applies to infrastructure as well. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: d6292c7d-aab7-43d3-a7c6-1e443b5c1aa4 + name: dependabot + tags: + - auto-pr + - patching + url: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/getting-started/dependabot-quickstart-guide + - uuid: 8228266e-e04f-40ba-94c8-bfadc5310920 + name: renovate + tags: + - auto-pr + - patching + url: https://github.com/renovatebot/renovate + dependsOn: + - 8ae0b92c-10e0-4602-ba22-7524d6aed488 # Automated PRs for patches + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 14.2.1 + - 14.2.5 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.25 + - 8.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Test%20for%20Time%20to%20Patch + comments: "" + meta: + implementationGuide: Usage of a version control platform API (e.g. github + API) can be used to fetch the information. Consider that `Measure libyears` + might be an alternative to this activity. + tags: + - patching + Test libyear: + uuid: 87b54313-fafd-4860-930f-5ef132b3e4ad + risk: Vulnerabilities in running artifacts stay for long and might get exploited. + measure: Test `libyear`, which provides a good insight how good patch management + is. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: 2fff917f-205e-4eab-2e0e-1fab8c04bf33 + name: libyear + tags: + - patching + - build + url: https://libyear.com/ + description: A simple measure of software dependency freshness. It is a single + number telling you how up-to-date your dependencies are. + dependsOn: + - f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b # Defined build process + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 14.2.1 + - 14.2.5 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.25 + - 8.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Test%20libyear + comments: "" + meta: + implementationGuide: | + `libyear` can be integrated into the build process and flag or even better break the build in case the defined threshold (e.g. 30 years) is reached. + An alternative approach is to determine `libyear` based on deployed artifacts (which requires more effort in implementation). + tags: + - patching + API design validation: + uuid: 017d9e26-42b5-49a4-b945-9f59b308fb99 + risk: Creation of insecure or non-compliant API. + measure: | + Design contract-first APIs using an interface description language such as OpenAPI, AsyncAPI or SOAP + and validate the specification using specific tools. + Checks should be integrated in IDEs and CI/CD pipelines. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: 261f243e-f89c-4169-b076-b22a03ec00be + name: Spectral + tags: + - linting + - api + - documentation + url: https://github.com/stoplightio/spectral + description: | + Spectral is a flexible JSON/YAML linter built with extensibility in mind. + It uses JSON/YAML path rules to describe the problems you want to find. + - uuid: d2c9403d-9da2-4518-b33f-8b74b9c5ca3f + name: API OAS Checker + tags: + - linting + - api + - documentation + url: https://github.com/italia/api-oas-checker + description: | + A tool to check OpenAPI specifications using a comprehensive ruleset based + on API best practices. + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 14.2.1 + - 14.2.5 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.25 + - 8.27 + - 8.28 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/API%20design%20validation + isImplemented: false + dependsOn: + - 2a44b708-734f-4463-b0cb-86dc46344b2f # Inventory of production components + tags: + - none + Local development security checks performed: + uuid: 6e180abc-7c98-4265-b4e9-852cb91b067b + risk: Creating and developing code contains code smells and quality issues. + measure: | + Integration of quality and linting plugins with interactive development environment (IDEs). + Implement pre-commit checks to prevent secrets & other security issues being commit to source code. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: 5b52a841-c281-45fd-b68f-0a93aa6fa398 + name: Fortify Extension for Visual Studio Code + url: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=fortifyvsts.fortify-extension-for-vs-code + test-url-expects: + - 404 + tags: + - ide + - sast + - uuid: cf1213fd-8bfa-4a97-bf8b-937c93f31005 + name: Setting Up the Visual Studio Code Extension Plugin + url: https://checkmarx.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SD/pages/1759216424/Setting+Up+the+Visual+Studio+Code+Extension+Plugin + test-url-expects: + - 302 + tags: + - ide + - sast + - uuid: 3f5a493d-12d0-4468-b9fa-c3e4eae89ffb + name: HCL AppScan CodeSweep + url: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=HCLTechnologies.hclappscancodesweep + test-url-expects: + - 404 + tags: + - ide + - sast + - uuid: 58ac9dea-b6c7-4698-904e-df89a9451c82 + name: DevSecOps control Pre-commit + url: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/security/zero-trust/develop/secure-devops-environments-zero-trust + tags: + - pre-commit + - uuid: 8da8d115-0f4e-40f0-a3ce-484a49e845fb + name: Building your DevSecOps pipeline 5 essential activities + url: https://www.blackduck.com/blog/devsecops-pipeline-checklist/ + tags: + - pre-commit + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 13.1.3 + iso27001-2022: + - Hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.22 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Local%20development%20security%20checks%20performed + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Software Composition Analysis (client side): + uuid: 07fe8c4f-ae33-4409-b1b2-cf64cfccea86 + risk: Client side components might have vulnerabilities. + measure: Tests for known vulnerabilities in components via Software Composition + Analysis of the frontend are performed. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 2 + level: 3 + dependsOn: + - f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b # Defined build process + - 2a44b708-734f-4463-b0cb-86dc46344b2f # Inventory of production components + - f2f0f274-c1a0-4501-92fe-7fc4452bc8ad # Exploit likelihood estimation + implementation: + - uuid: aa54a82c-d628-4d42-9bc8-1aa269cd91c7 + name: retire.js + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/RetireJS/retire.js/ + - uuid: 7c26484a-763c-437d-b953-d482a4fd7cf3 + name: npm audit + tags: [] + url: https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/audit + test-url-expects: + - 301 + - uuid: 500399bd-7dfc-47fd-99d8-b55cefb760a9 + name: Dependency-Track + description: | + Dependency-Track is an intelligent Component Analysis platform that allows organizations to identify and reduce risk in the software supply chain. Dependency-Track takes a unique and highly beneficial approach by leveraging the capabilities of Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). + url: https://github.com/DependencyTrack/dependency-track + tags: + - sca + - inventory + - OpenSource + - Supply Chain + - vulnerability + - inventory + - uuid: 5c0e817b-204e-4301-a315-2f7cc180c240 + name: Dependabot + tags: + - dependency + - dependency-management + - scm + url: https://github.com/dependabot/dependabot-core + description: | + Dependabot creates pull requests to keep your dependencies secure and up-to-date. + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + - I-SB-B-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Software%20Composition%20Analysis%20%28client%20side%29 + isImplemented: false + tags: + - defect-management + - sca + evidence: "" + comments: "" + Static analysis for important client side components: + uuid: e237176b-bec5-447d-a926-e37d6dd60e4b + risk: Important parts in the source code of the frontend have vulnerabilities. + measure: Usage of static analysis tools for important parts of the frontend + are used. Static analysis uses for example string matching algorithms and/or + dataflow analysis. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: 6a0948a7-4781-4858-9766-f4303971b28b + name: eslint + tags: [] + url: https://eslint.org/ + - uuid: f911d2b4-3e0c-424c-acf9-3bd363ef5078 + name: FindSecurityBugs + tags: [] + - uuid: cccc2882-62ab-4175-afa1-58471017e8ed + name: jsprime + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/dpnishant/jsprime + - uuid: 3a8ba0ea-37dc-4124-983b-bbf9b4443d75 + name: '[bdd-mobile-security' + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/ing-bank/bdd-mobile-security-automation-framework + description: '[bdd-mobile-security-automation-framework](https://github.com/ing-bank/bdd-mobile-security-automation-framework)' + - uuid: 5b52a841-c281-45fd-b68f-0a93aa6fa398 + name: Fortify Extension for Visual Studio Code + url: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=fortifyvsts.fortify-extension-for-vs-code + test-url-expects: + - 404 + tags: + - ide + - sast + - uuid: cf1213fd-8bfa-4a97-bf8b-937c93f31005 + name: Setting Up the Visual Studio Code Extension Plugin + url: https://checkmarx.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SD/pages/1759216424/Setting+Up+the+Visual+Studio+Code+Extension+Plugin + test-url-expects: + - 302 + tags: + - ide + - sast + - uuid: 3f5a493d-12d0-4468-b9fa-c3e4eae89ffb + name: HCL AppScan CodeSweep + url: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=HCLTechnologies.hclappscancodesweep + test-url-expects: + - 404 + tags: + - ide + - sast + dependsOn: + - f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b # Defined build process + - 2a44b708-734f-4463-b0cb-86dc46344b2f # Inventory of production components + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Static%20analysis%20for%20important%20client%20side%20components + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Static analysis for important server side components: + uuid: 6c05c837-8c99-46e2-828b-7c903e27dba4 + risk: Important parts in the source code of the middleware have vulnerabilities. + measure: Usage of static analysis tools for important parts of the middleware + are used. Static analysis uses for example string matching algorithms and/or + dataflow analysis. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: 6a0948a7-4781-4858-9766-f4303971b28b + name: eslint + tags: [] + url: https://eslint.org/ + - uuid: f911d2b4-3e0c-424c-acf9-3bd363ef5078 + name: FindSecurityBugs + tags: [] + - uuid: cccc2882-62ab-4175-afa1-58471017e8ed + name: jsprime + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/dpnishant/jsprime + - uuid: 5b52a841-c281-45fd-b68f-0a93aa6fa398 + name: Fortify Extension for Visual Studio Code + url: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=fortifyvsts.fortify-extension-for-vs-code + test-url-expects: + - 404 + tags: + - ide + - sast + - uuid: cf1213fd-8bfa-4a97-bf8b-937c93f31005 + name: Setting Up the Visual Studio Code Extension Plugin + url: https://checkmarx.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SD/pages/1759216424/Setting+Up+the+Visual+Studio+Code+Extension+Plugin + test-url-expects: + - 302 + tags: + - ide + - sast + - uuid: 3f5a493d-12d0-4468-b9fa-c3e4eae89ffb + name: HCL AppScan CodeSweep + url: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=HCLTechnologies.hclappscancodesweep + test-url-expects: + - 404 + tags: + - ide + - sast + dependsOn: + - f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b # Defined build process + - 2a44b708-734f-4463-b0cb-86dc46344b2f # Inventory of production components + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + - I-SB-B-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Static%20analysis%20for%20important%20server%20side%20components + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Test for Patch Deployment Time: + uuid: 0cb2c39a-3cec-4353-b3ab-8d70daf4c9d2 + risk: Automatic PRs for dependencies are overlooked resulting in known vulnerabilities + in production artifacts. + measure: | + Test of the Patch Deployment Time. + This activity is not repeated in the Sub-Dimension "Static depth for infrastructure", but it applies to infrastructure as well. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + implementation: + - uuid: 00702aca-04d9-49ca-90d0-c32c199b26cb + name: PMD + tags: [] + dependsOn: + - 8ae0b92c-10e0-4602-ba22-7524d6aed488 # Automated PRs for patches + - f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b # Defined build process + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 14.2.1 + - 14.2.5 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.25 + - 8.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Test%20for%20Patch%20Deployment%20Time + comments: "" + meta: + implementationGuide: Self implementation. This activity is not repeated in + the Sub-Dimension "Static depth for infrastructure", but it applies to infrastructure + as well. + tags: + - patching + Static analysis for all self written components: + uuid: ee68331f-9b1d-4f61-844b-b2ea04753a84 + risk: Parts in the source code of the frontend or middleware have vulnerabilities. + measure: Usage of static analysis tools for all parts of the middleware and + frontend. Static analysis uses for example string matching algorithms and/or + dataflow analysis. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 4 + implementation: + - uuid: 6a0948a7-4781-4858-9766-f4303971b28b + name: eslint + tags: [] + url: https://eslint.org/ + - uuid: f911d2b4-3e0c-424c-acf9-3bd363ef5078 + name: FindSecurityBugs + tags: [] + - uuid: cccc2882-62ab-4175-afa1-58471017e8ed + name: jsprime + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/dpnishant/jsprime + - uuid: 5b52a841-c281-45fd-b68f-0a93aa6fa398 + name: Fortify Extension for Visual Studio Code + url: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=fortifyvsts.fortify-extension-for-vs-code + test-url-expects: + - 404 + tags: + - ide + - sast + - uuid: cf1213fd-8bfa-4a97-bf8b-937c93f31005 + name: Setting Up the Visual Studio Code Extension Plugin + url: https://checkmarx.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SD/pages/1759216424/Setting+Up+the+Visual+Studio+Code+Extension+Plugin + test-url-expects: + - 302 + tags: + - ide + - sast + - uuid: 3f5a493d-12d0-4468-b9fa-c3e4eae89ffb + name: HCL AppScan CodeSweep + url: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=HCLTechnologies.hclappscancodesweep + test-url-expects: + - 404 + tags: + - ide + - sast + dependsOn: + - e237176b-bec5-447d-a926-e37d6dd60e4b # Static analysis for important client side components + - 6c05c837-8c99-46e2-828b-7c903e27dba4 # Static analysis for important server side components + - 2a44b708-734f-4463-b0cb-86dc46344b2f # Inventory of production components + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + - I-SB-B-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Static%20analysis%20for%20all%20self%20written%20components + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Usage of multiple analyzers: + uuid: 297be001-8d94-41ee-ab29-207020d423c0 + risk: Each vulnerability analyzer has different opportunities. By using just + one analyzer, some vulnerabilities might not be found. + measure: Usage of multiple static tools to find more vulnerabilities. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 5 + usefulness: 1 + level: 4 + dependsOn: + - d918cd44-a972-43e9-a974-eff3f4a5dcfe # Software Composition Analysis (server side) + - 07fe8c4f-ae33-4409-b1b2-cf64cfccea86 # Software Composition Analysis (client side) + - ee68331f-9b1d-4f61-844b-b2ea04753a84 # Static analysis for all self written components + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + - 14.2.1 + - 14.2.5 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + - 8.25 + - 8.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Usage%20of%20multiple%20analyzers + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Dead code elimination: + uuid: a8d7d1f1-fc24-49ab-8fb6-f3a03da9c61d + risk: Dead code increases the attack surface (use of hard coded credentials + and variables, sensitive information) + measure: Collection of unused code and then manual removal of unused code. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 1 + level: 5 + implementation: + - uuid: 00702aca-04d9-49ca-90d0-c32c199b26cb + name: PMD + tags: [] + dependsOn: + - f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b # Defined build process + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 14.2.1 + - 14.2.5 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.25 + - 8.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Dead%20code%20elimination + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Exclusion of source code duplicates: + uuid: d17dbff0-1f10-492a-b4c7-17bb59a0a711 + risk: Duplicates in source code might influence the stability of the application. + measure: Automatic Detection and manual removal of duplicates in source code. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 1 + level: 5 + implementation: + - uuid: 00702aca-04d9-49ca-90d0-c32c199b26cb + name: PMD + tags: [] + dependsOn: + - f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b # Defined build process + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 14.2.1 + - 14.2.5 + iso27001-2022: + - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.25 + - 8.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Exclusion%20of%20source%20code%20duplicates + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Static analysis for all components/libraries: + uuid: f4ff841d-3b2a-45d9-853e-5ec7ecbcb054 + risk: Used components like libraries and legacy applications might have vulnerabilities + measure: Usage of a static analysis for all used components. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 4 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 5 + dependsOn: + - e237176b-bec5-447d-a926-e37d6dd60e4b # Static analysis for important client side components + - 6c05c837-8c99-46e2-828b-7c903e27dba4 # Static analysis for important server side components + - 2a44b708-734f-4463-b0cb-86dc46344b2f # Inventory of production components + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + - I-SB-B-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Static%20analysis%20for%20all%20components%2Flibraries + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Stylistic analysis: + uuid: efa52cc8-6c5c-4ba2-a3d2-7164b0402f34 + risk: Unclear or obfuscated code might have unexpected behavior. + measure: Analysis of compliance to style guides of the source code ensures that + source code formatting rules are met (e.g. indentation, loops, ...). + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 1 + level: 5 + implementation: + - uuid: 00702aca-04d9-49ca-90d0-c32c199b26cb + name: PMD + tags: [] + - uuid: 0b7ec352-0c36-4de1-8912-617fc6c608fe + name: How to enforce a consistent coding style in your projects + url: https://www.meziantou.net/how-to-enforce-a-consistent-coding-style-in-your-projects.htm + tags: + - ide + - linting + - uuid: 6a0948a7-4781-4858-9766-f4303971b28b + name: eslint + tags: [] + url: https://eslint.org/ + - uuid: aa5ded61-5380-4da6-9474-afc36a397682 + name: In-Depth Linting of Your TypeScript While Coding + url: https://medium.com/@elenavilchik/in-depth-linting-of-your-typescript-while-coding-1d084affbf0 + test-url-expects: + - 403 + tags: + - ide + - linting + - uuid: 94a7a85e-8064-46b4-929a-9e03fa292a9f + name: Super-Linter + tags: + - linting + - scm + url: https://github.com/github/super-linter + description: | + Lint code bases to catch common errors and enforce code style + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + - 14.2.1 + - 14.2.5 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + - 8.25 + - 8.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20applications/subsection/Stylistic%20analysis + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Static depth for infrastructure: + Test for stored secrets in build artifacts: + uuid: d5e6303c-d5c6-4d59-b258-a3b9de38a07f + risk: Stored secrets in container images or other build artifacts shouldn't + exists because they might be exposed to unauthorized parties. + measure: Test for secrets in container images and other artifacts + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 2 + level: 1 + implementation: + - uuid: d90fefc9-4e5d-420f-ac87-eeb165bf0ee6 + name: truffleHog + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/trufflesecurity/trufflehog + - uuid: 382873e2-8604-4410-ae5e-b0f5ccdee835 + name: go-pillage-registries + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/nccgroup/go-pillage-registries + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - vcs usage is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 9.4.3 + - 10.1.2 + iso27001-2022: + - vcs usage is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 5.17 + - 8.24 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20infrastructure/subsection/Test%20for%20stored%20secrets%20in%20build%20artifacts + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Test for stored secrets in code: + uuid: c6e3c812-56e2-41b0-ae01-b7afc41a004c + risk: Stored secrets in git history or directly in code shouldn't exists because + they might be exposed to unauthorized parties. + measure: Test for secrets in code and git history + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 2 + level: 1 + implementation: + - uuid: d90fefc9-4e5d-420f-ac87-eeb165bf0ee6 + name: truffleHog + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/trufflesecurity/trufflehog + - uuid: 382873e2-8604-4410-ae5e-b0f5ccdee835 + name: go-pillage-registries + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/nccgroup/go-pillage-registries + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - vcs usage is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 9.4.3 + - 10.1.2 + iso27001-2022: + - vcs usage is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 5.17 + - 8.24 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20infrastructure/subsection/Test%20for%20stored%20secrets%20in%20code + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Test cluster deployment resources: + uuid: 621fb6a5-5c0a-4408-826a-068868bb031b + risk: The deployment configuration (e.g. kubernetes deployment resources) might + contain unsecured configurations. + measure: Test the deployment configuration for virtualized environments for + unsecured configurations. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: 1e58f8d2-61e2-45bb-a17c-51516d0cc9ba + name: kubesec + tags: [] + url: https://kubesec.io + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - System hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 12.6.1 + - 14.2.3 + - 14.2.8 + iso27001-2022: + - System hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.8 + - 8.32 + - 8.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20infrastructure/subsection/Test%20cluster%20deployment%20resources + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Test for image lifetime: + uuid: ddfe7c3c-b7a4-4cba-9041-b044d4a34e5b + risk: Old container images in production indicate that patch management is not + performed and therefore vulnerabilities might exists. + measure: Check the image age of containers in production. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 2 + level: 2 + implementation: + - url: https://github.com/SDA-SE/cluster-image-scanner + uuid: 3c9ac78c-0fd4-43f4-8211-c915f9ef685f + name: ClusterScanner + tags: + - docker + - image + - container + - vulnerability + - misconfiguration + - security-tools + - scanning + description: Discover vulnerabilities and container image misconfiguration + in production environments. + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + - 14.2.5 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + - 8.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20infrastructure/subsection/Test%20for%20image%20lifetime + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Test of virtualized environments: + uuid: 58825d22-1ce6-4748-af81-0ec9956e4129 + risk: Virtualized environments (e.g. via Container Images) might contains + unsecure configurations. + measure: Test virtualized environments for unsecured configurations. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: 73419fb5-b13d-4242-83ec-86f36c7d73d5 + name: Dive to inspect a container images + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/wagoodman/dive + - url: https://github.com/SDA-SE/cluster-image-scanner + uuid: 3c9ac78c-0fd4-43f4-8211-c915f9ef685f + name: ClusterScanner + tags: + - docker + - image + - container + - vulnerability + - misconfiguration + - security-tools + - scanning + description: Discover vulnerabilities and container image misconfiguration + in production environments. + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - ISO 27001:2017 mapping is missing + iso27001-2022: + - ISO 27001:2022 mapping is missing + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20infrastructure/subsection/Test%20of%20virtualized%20environments + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Test the cloud configuration: + uuid: 46d6a2a8-f9dc-4c15-9fc8-1723cfecbddc + risk: Standard hardening practices for cloud environments are not performed + leading to vulnerabilities. + measure: With the help of tools, the configuration of virtual environments are + tested. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 2 + implementation: + - uuid: 8aeefd29-6220-45bf-aead-83eba2e9d055 + name: kube-bench + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/aquasecurity/kube-bench + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - System hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 12.6.1 + - 14.2.3 + - 14.2.8 + iso27001-2022: + - System hardening is not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific + - 8.8 + - 8.32 + - 8.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20infrastructure/subsection/Test%20the%20cloud%20configuration + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Test the definition of virtualized environments: + uuid: 8fc3de67-7b8d-420b-8d24-f35928cfed6e + risk: The definition of virtualized environments (e.g. via Dockerfile) + might contain unsecure configurations. + measure: Test the definition of virtualized environments for unsecured configurations. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 2 + meta: + implementationGuide: For containier (images), test that the images are following + best practices like distroless or non-root. + implementation: + - uuid: 94d993ad-ef6e-4d9f-b7a8-27ea68dc3005 + name: Dockerfile with hadolint + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/hadolint/hadolint + - uuid: 95b717cd-5ad3-40b5-993b-13a63c382b1b + name: Deployment with kube-score + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/zegl/kube-score + - uuid: eba2685d-2d25-4961-8e4e-2957e7c07c30 + name: dockerfilelint + tags: + - sast + - docker + - dockerfile + url: https://github.com/replicatedhq/dockerfilelint + description: dockerfilelint is an node module that analyzes a Dockerfile and + looks for common traps, mistakes and helps enforce best practices. + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - System hardening, virtual environments are not explicitly covered by ISO + 27001 - too specific + - 12.6.1 + - 14.2.3 + - 14.2.8 + - 14.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - System hardening, virtual environments are not explicitly covered by ISO + 27001 - too specific + - 8.8 + - 8.32 + - 8.29 + - 8.25 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20infrastructure/subsection/Test%20the%20definition%20of%20virtualized%20environments + isImplemented: false + tags: + - none + Test for malware: + uuid: 837f8f90-adc2-4e6b-9ebb-60c2ee29494d + risk: Third party might include malware. Ether due to the maintainer (e.g. + typo squatting of an image name and using the wrong image) or by an attacker + on behalf of the maintainer with stolen credentials. + measure: Check for malware in components (e.g. container images, VM baseline + images, libraries). + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + implementation: + - url: https://github.com/SDA-SE/cluster-image-scanner + uuid: 3c9ac78c-0fd4-43f4-8211-c915f9ef685f + name: ClusterScanner + tags: + - docker + - image + - container + - vulnerability + - misconfiguration + - security-tools + - scanning + description: Discover vulnerabilities and container image misconfiguration + in production environments. + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.7 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20infrastructure/subsection/Test%20for%20malware + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Test for new image version: + uuid: cb6321aa-0fbf-4996-9e08-05ab26ef4c1e + risk: When a new version of an image is available, it might fix security vulnerabilities. + measure: Check for new images of containers in production. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 2 + level: 3 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + - 14.2.5 + - 12.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + - 8.7 + - 8.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20infrastructure/subsection/Test%20for%20new%20image%20version + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Correlate known vulnerabilities in infrastructure with new image versions: + uuid: 7de0ae33-6538-45cd-8222-a1475647ba58 + risk: TODO. + measure: TODO + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 5 + resources: 4 + usefulness: 1 + level: 4 + dependsOn: + - 485a3383-7f2e-4dba-bb84-479377070904 # Usage of a maximum lifetime for images + implementation: + - uuid: fab2765d-8d96-4fc6-af96-dc9304ca41dc + name: Anchore.io + tags: [] + url: https://anchore.com/ + - uuid: f10f5423-4dff-4bb7-99c8-9ce214645071 + name: Clair + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/quay/clair + - uuid: d0c6b3a0-b073-44d7-a187-c4ad8eaa6531 + name: OpenSCAP + tags: [] + url: https://www.open-scap.org/ + - uuid: 04261564-2fcf-4b73-8847-83b0d855e1c5 + name: Vuls + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/future-architect/vuls + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + - 14.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + - 8.25 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20infrastructure/subsection/Correlate%20known%20vulnerabilities%20in%20infrastructure%20with%20new%20image%20versions + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Software Composition Analysis: + uuid: 26e1c6d5-5632-4ec7-80d2-e564b98732ad + risk: Known vulnerabilities in infrastructure components like container images + might get exploited. + measure: Check for known vulnerabilities + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 4 + level: 4 + description: Subscribing to Github projects and reading release notes might + help. Software Composition Analysis for infrastructure might help, but is + often too fine-granular. + implementation: + - uuid: 7f500e95-2110-44c4-a1f8-cd7ef5d9eb6b + name: Trivy + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy + - uuid: 8737c6c0-4e90-400a-bf9a-f8e399913b57 + name: Registries like quay + tags: [] + description: Registries like quay, dockerhub provide (commercial) offerings, + often not suitable for distroless images + - uuid: 500399bd-7dfc-47fd-99d8-b55cefb760a9 + name: Dependency-Track + description: | + Dependency-Track is an intelligent Component Analysis platform that allows organizations to identify and reduce risk in the software supply chain. Dependency-Track takes a unique and highly beneficial approach by leveraging the capabilities of Software Bill of Materials (SBOM). + url: https://github.com/DependencyTrack/dependency-track + tags: + - sca + - inventory + - OpenSource + - Supply Chain + - vulnerability + - inventory + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20infrastructure/subsection/Software%20Composition%20Analysis + isImplemented: false + tags: + - scanning + - sca + evidence: "" + comments: "" + Test of infrastructure components for known vulnerabilities: + uuid: 13367d8f-e37f-4197-a610-9ffca4fde261 + risk: Infrastructure components might have vulnerabilities. + measure: Test for known vulnerabilities in infrastructure components. Often, + the only way to respond to known vulnerabilities in operating system packages + is to accept the risk and wait for a patch. As the patch needs to be applied + fast when it is available, this activity depends on 'Usage of a maximum life + for images'. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 5 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 1 + level: 4 + dependsOn: + - 485a3383-7f2e-4dba-bb84-479377070904 # Usage of a maximum lifetime for images + implementation: + - uuid: fab2765d-8d96-4fc6-af96-dc9304ca41dc + name: Anchore.io + tags: [] + url: https://anchore.com/ + - uuid: f10f5423-4dff-4bb7-99c8-9ce214645071 + name: Clair + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/quay/clair + - uuid: d0c6b3a0-b073-44d7-a187-c4ad8eaa6531 + name: OpenSCAP + tags: [] + url: https://www.open-scap.org/ + - uuid: 04261564-2fcf-4b73-8847-83b0d855e1c5 + name: Vuls + tags: [] + url: https://github.com/future-architect/vuls + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + - 14.2.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + - 8.25 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Static%20depth%20for%20infrastructure/subsection/Test%20of%20infrastructure%20components%20for%20known%20vulnerabilities + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Test Intensity: + Default settings for intensity: + uuid: ab0a4b51-3b18-43f1-a6fc-a98e4b28453d + risk: Time pressure and ignorance might lead to false predictions for the test + intensity. + measure: The intensity of the used tools are not modified to save time. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 1 + level: 1 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + - 14.2.1 + - 14.2.5 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + - 8.25 + - 8.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Test%20Intensity/subsection/Default%20settings%20for%20intensity + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Regular automated tests: + uuid: 598897a2-358e-441f-984c-e12ec4f6110a + risk: After pushing source code to the version control system, any delay in + receiving feedback on defects makes them harder for the developer to remediate. + measure: On each push and/or at given intervals automatic security tests are + performed. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 2 + level: 2 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - I-SB-A-3 + - V-ST-A-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 14.2.3 + - 14.2.8 + - 14.2.9 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.32 + - 8.29 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Test%20Intensity/subsection/Regular%20automated%20tests + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Deactivating of unneeded tests: + uuid: 1bd78cdd-ef11-4bb5-9b58-5af2e25fe1c5 + risk: As tools cover a wide range of different vulnerability tests, they might + not match the used components. Therefore, they need more time and resources + as they need and the feedback loops takes too much time. + measure: Unneeded tests are deactivated. For example in case the service is + using a Mongo database and no mysql database, the dynamic scan doesn't need + to test for sql injections. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 1 + level: 3 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + - 14.2.1 + - 14.2.5 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + - 8.25 + - 8.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Test%20Intensity/subsection/Deactivating%20of%20unneeded%20tests + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + High test intensity: + uuid: 2ebfc421-8c76-415c-a3b0-fa518915bd10 + risk: A too small intensity or a too high confidence might lead to not visible + vulnerabilities. + measure: A deep scan with high test intensity and a low confidence threshold + is performed. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 5 + usefulness: 3 + level: 3 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.6.1 + - 14.2.1 + - 14.2.5 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.8 + - 8.25 + - 8.27 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Test%20Intensity/subsection/High%20test%20intensity + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none + Creation and application of a testing concept: + uuid: 79ef8103-e1ed-4055-8df8-fd2b2015bebe + risk: Scans might use a too small or too high test intensity. + measure: A testing concept considering the amount of time per scan/intensity + is created and applied. A dynamic analysis needs more time than a static analysis. + The dynamic scan, depending on the test intensity might be performed on every + commit, every night, every week or once in a month. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 3 + resources: 3 + usefulness: 2 + level: 4 + implementation: [] + references: + samm2: + - V-ST-A-2 + iso27001-2017: + - 14.2.2 + - 14.2.3 + - 14.2.1 + - 14.2.5 + - 12.6.1 + iso27001-2022: + - 8.25 + - 8.32 + - 8.27 + - 8.8 + openCRE: + - https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/DevSecOps%20Maturity%20Model%20%28DSOMM%29/section/Test%20Intensity/subsection/Creation%20and%20application%20of%20a%20testing%20concept + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" + tags: + - none +... diff --git a/src/assets/YAML/default/BuildAndDeployment/Build.yaml b/src/assets/YAML/default/BuildAndDeployment/Build.yaml index 39f7bdd..6f61666 100755 --- a/src/assets/YAML/default/BuildAndDeployment/Build.yaml +++ b/src/assets/YAML/default/BuildAndDeployment/Build.yaml @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Build and Deployment: level: 2 implementation: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/ci-cd-tools - - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/container-technologi + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/container-technology references: samm2: - I-SB-A-2 @@ -42,34 +42,36 @@ Build and Deployment: Defined build process: uuid: f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b description: | - A *build process* include more than just compiling your source code. - It also includes steps such as managing (third party) dependencies, - environment configuration, running the unit tests, etc. - - A *defined build process* has automated these steps to ensure consistency. + A *build process* includes more than just compiling your source code. It also covers: + - Managing (third party) dependencies + - Environment configuration + - Running unit and integration tests + - Security scanning and compliance checks + - Artifact creation and storage + - Deployment preparation - This can be done with a Jenkinsfile, Maven, or similar tools. + Basing the build process on human memory may lead to inconsistencies and security misconfigurations. + + A *defined build process* can automate these steps to ensure consistency, avoiding accidental omissions or misconfigurations. Use tools such as Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, or Maven to codify the process. + + A simplified, but still a *defined build process*, may be a checklist of the steps to be performed. risk: - Performing builds without a defined process is error prone; for example, - as a result of incorrect security related configuration. + Without a defined and automated build process the risk increase for accidental mistakes, forgetting test activities, and insecure misconfigurations. measure: - A well defined build process lowers the possibility of errors during - the build process. + Find a tool that suits your environment. Add your manual build steps, include steps for running tests, scanning and preparation for deployment. + assessment: | + - Show your build pipeline configuration (e.g., Jenkinsfile, GitHub Actions workflow) and an exemplary job (build + test + security scan). + level: 1 difficultyOfImplementation: knowledge: 2 time: 3 resources: 2 usefulness: 4 - level: 1 - assessment: | - - Show your build pipeline and an exemplary job (build + test). - - Show that every team member has access. - - Show that failed jobs are fixed. - - Credits: AppSecure-nrw [Security Belts](https://github.com/AppSecure-nrw/security-belts/) implementation: + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/jenkins + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/maven - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/ci-cd-tools - - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/container-technologi + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/container-technology references: samm2: - I-SB-A-1 @@ -144,7 +146,9 @@ Build and Deployment: resources: 3 usefulness: 3 level: 2 - implementation: [] + implementation: + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/trivy + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/syft references: samm2: - I-SB-B-1 @@ -156,6 +160,7 @@ Build and Deployment: - 5.9 - 5.12 isImplemented: false + tags: ["inventory", "scanning", "sca"] evidence: "" comments: "" Signing of artifacts: diff --git a/src/assets/YAML/default/BuildAndDeployment/Deployment.yaml b/src/assets/YAML/default/BuildAndDeployment/Deployment.yaml index e6f76a0..4e5b445 100755 --- a/src/assets/YAML/default/BuildAndDeployment/Deployment.yaml +++ b/src/assets/YAML/default/BuildAndDeployment/Deployment.yaml @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Build and Deployment: usefulness: 2 level: 5 implementation: - - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/blue-green-deploymen + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/blue-green-deployment dependsOn: - Smoke Test references: @@ -38,6 +38,70 @@ Build and Deployment: isImplemented: false evidence: "" comments: "" + Canary deployment: + uuid: c4204a32-2545-4424-b524-d1cc52b46abd + description: |- + A *canary deployment* gradually shifts a small fraction of production + traffic to a new artifact version while monitoring service-level + indicators and security signals. If error rates, latency, or security + scanners (such as DAST probes against the canary fleet) report + anomalies, traffic is rolled back automatically before the new + version reaches the broader production population. + + Compared to *Blue/Green Deployment*, canary requires only a small + delta in infrastructure cost (commonly 5-10% additional capacity + rather than a doubled environment) but demands more sophisticated + traffic-control infrastructure such as a service mesh, an + application load balancer with weighted routing, or a feature-flag + platform. + risk: |- + A new artifact version can introduce regressions or security + issues. Promoting it to 100% of production traffic in one step + exposes the entire user population to those issues before they + can be detected. + measure: |- + Adopt a canary deployment strategy in which a small percentage of + production traffic (commonly 1-10%) is routed to the new artifact + version for a defined observation window. Promotion to higher + traffic percentages is gated on automated SLI checks (error rate, + latency, saturation) and security checks (DAST, runtime anomaly + detection). Rollback must be automated and triggered by gate + failure without human intervention. + assessment: | + - Canary stage exists in the deployment pipeline with a configured + initial traffic percentage and observation window. + - Automated promotion and rollback gates are defined based on SLIs + and security signals. + - Audit logs of canary deployments and their promotion or rollback + decisions are retained. + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 3 + time: 2 + resources: 2 + usefulness: 3 + level: 4 + implementation: + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/canary-deployment + dependsOn: + - 67e1a9aa-9fbf-4ec5-a2de-400f01960c51 # Automated deployment process + references: + samm2: + - I-SD-A-3 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.1.2 # Change management + - 12.5.1 # Installation of software on operational systems + - 14.2.2 # System change control procedures + - 14.2.9 # System acceptance testing + - 17.2.1 # Availability of information processing facilities + iso27001-2022: + - 8.14 + - 8.19 + - 8.29 + - 8.31 + - 8.32 + isImplemented: false + evidence: "" + comments: "" Defined decommissioning process: uuid: da4ff665-dcb9-4e93-9d20-48cdedc50fc2 description: |- @@ -69,23 +133,58 @@ Build and Deployment: comments: "" Defined deployment process: uuid: 74938a3f-1269-49b9-9d0f-c43a79a1985a + description: | + A *defined deployment process* is a documented and standardized procedure for releasing software into production, ensuring consistency and reducing the risk of errors. + risk: >- + Deployments relying on human memory are prone to errors, making experienced long-ter staff critical. + measure: >- + Establish a written deployment process documented in README files, wikis, or implemented as executable scripts and automated steps. + assessment: | + - Deployment process is documented and available to relevant staff + - Logs of deployments are documented and availabe to relevant staff + level: 1 + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 1 + time: 1 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 1 + dependsOn: + - f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b # Def. Build Process + - 066084c6-1135-4635-9cc5-9e75c7c5459f # Version control + implementation: + references: + samm2: + - I-SD-A-1 + iso27001-2017: + - 12.1.1 + - 14.2.2 + iso27001-2022: + - 5.37 + - 8.32 + Automated deployment process: + uuid: 67e1a9aa-9fbf-4ec5-a2de-400f01960c51 + description: | + An *automated deployment process* implements the defined deployment steps using automation tools, ensuring consistency, auditability, and minimizing the risk of human errors or unauthorized changes. risk: >- - Deployment of insecure or malfunctioning artifacts. + Deployments relying on manual routines increase the risk of errors, insecure configurations, or deploying malfunctioning artifacts. measure: >- - Defining a deployment process ensures that there are - established criteria in terms of functionalities, - security, compliance, and performance, - and that the artifacts meet them. + Automating the deployment process enforces predefined criteria for security, compliance, and performance, ensuring reliable artifact delivery. + assessment: | + - Deployment process is documented and available to relevant staff + - All deployment steps are automated + - Provide audit logs or evidence of deployments + level: 1 difficultyOfImplementation: knowledge: 2 time: 2 - resources: 1 + resources: 2 usefulness: 4 - level: 1 dependsOn: - f6f7737f-25a9-4317-8de2-09bf59f29b5b # Def. Build Process + - 74938a3f-1269-49b9-9d0f-c43a79a1985a # Def. Deployment Process implementation: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/ci-cd-tools + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/jenkins - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/docker references: samm2: @@ -96,9 +195,6 @@ Build and Deployment: iso27001-2022: - 5.37 - 8.32 - isImplemented: false - evidence: "" - comments: "" Environment depending configuration parameters (secrets): uuid: df428c9d-efa0-4226-9f47-a15bb53f822b risk: >- @@ -209,21 +305,28 @@ Build and Deployment: tags: - inventory - sbom + - scanning + - sca Inventory of production components: uuid: 2a44b708-734f-4463-b0cb-86dc46344b2f + description: | + An inventory of production components is a complete, up-to-date list of all applications running in production. This enables effective vulnerability management, incident response, and compliance. Without it, organizations risk running unmaintained or unauthorized software. risk: |- An organization is unaware of components like applications in production. Not knowing existing applications in production leads to not assessing it. measure: |- A documented inventory of components in production exists (gathered manually or automatically). For example a manually created document with applications in production. In a kubernetes cluster, namespaces can be automatically gathered and documented, e.g. in a JSON in a S3 bucket/git repository, dependency track. + assessment: | + - Inventory of all production applications with application name, owner, and date of last review + - Inventory is accessible to development, security and operations teams dependsOn: - - Defined deployment process + - 67e1a9aa-9fbf-4ec5-a2de-400f01960c51 # Automated deployment process + level: 1 difficultyOfImplementation: knowledge: 1 time: 1 resources: 1 usefulness: 4 - level: 1 implementation: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/backstage - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/dependencyTrack @@ -248,7 +351,7 @@ Build and Deployment: is deployed. measure: A documented inventory of artifacts in production like container images exists (gathered manually or automatically). dependsOn: - - Defined deployment process + - 67e1a9aa-9fbf-4ec5-a2de-400f01960c51 # Automated deployment process - 2a44b708-734f-4463-b0cb-86dc46344b2f # Inventory of production components difficultyOfImplementation: knowledge: 2 @@ -287,7 +390,7 @@ Build and Deployment: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/webserver - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/rolling-update dependsOn: - - Defined deployment process + - 67e1a9aa-9fbf-4ec5-a2de-400f01960c51 # Automated deployment process references: samm2: - I-SD-A-2 diff --git a/src/assets/YAML/default/BuildAndDeployment/PatchManagement.yaml b/src/assets/YAML/default/BuildAndDeployment/PatchManagement.yaml index 321ac62..3360754 100755 --- a/src/assets/YAML/default/BuildAndDeployment/PatchManagement.yaml +++ b/src/assets/YAML/default/BuildAndDeployment/PatchManagement.yaml @@ -4,16 +4,23 @@ Build and Deployment: Patch Management: A patch policy is defined: uuid: 99415139-6b50-441b-89e1-0aa59accd43d - risk: Vulnerabilities in running artifacts stay for long and might get exploited. + description: | + A patch policy defines how and when software components, images, and dependencies are updated. A patch policy ensures that all these artifacts are regularly reviewed and updated, reducing the window of exposure to known threats. The policy should specify the frequency, responsibilities, and documentation requirements for patching. + risk: Vulnerabilities in running artifacts may persist for a long time and might be exploited. measure: - A patch policy for all artifacts (e.g. in images) is defined. How often + Define a patch policy for all artifacts (e.g. in images) is defined. How often is an image rebuilt? + assessment: | + - Patch policy is documented and accessible to relevant staff. + - The policy defines patch frequency and responsible roles. + - Patch actions and exceptions are logged and reviewed. + - Evidence of regular patching and policy review is available. + level: 1 difficultyOfImplementation: knowledge: 3 time: 1 resources: 2 usefulness: 4 - level: 1 implementation: [] references: samm2: @@ -33,23 +40,27 @@ Build and Deployment: - patching Automated PRs for patches: uuid: 8ae0b92c-10e0-4602-ba22-7524d6aed488 - risk: - Components with known (or unknown) vulnerabilities might stay for long and get exploited, - even when a patch is available. - measure: - Fast patching of third party component is needed. The DevOps way is - to have an automated pull request for new components. This includes - + description: | + Automated PRs for patches ensure that updates for outdated or vulnerable dependencies are created and proposed without manual intervention. Tools continuously monitor for new versions or security advisories and immediately generate pull requests to update affected components in code, container images, or infrastructure. This process ensures that available patches are quickly visible to developers and can be reviewed and merged with minimal delay, reducing the risk window for known vulnerabilities. + risk: | + Components with known vulnerabilities might persist for a long time and be exploited, even when a patch is available. + measure: | + Fast patching of third-party components is needed. The DevOps way is to have an automated pull request for new components. This includes: * Applications - * Virtualized operating system components (e.g. container images) - * Operating Systems - * Infrastructure as Code/GitOps (e.g. argocd based on a git repository or terraform) + * Virtualized operating system components (e.g., container images) + * Operating systems + * Infrastructure as Code/GitOps (e.g., ArgoCD based on a git repository or Terraform) + assessment: | + - Automated PR tooling is enabled for all relevant repositories. + - PRs are created automatically for outdated or vulnerable dependencies. + - PRs are reviewed and merged according to the defined patch policy. + - Evidence of automated PRs and patching activity is available. + level: 1 difficultyOfImplementation: knowledge: 2 time: 2 resources: 2 usefulness: 4 - level: 1 implementation: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/dependabot - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/jenkins @@ -245,7 +256,7 @@ Build and Deployment: comments: "" tags: - patching - Automated deployment of automated PRs: + Automated deployment of automated PRs: &automerge-PR uuid: 08f27c26-2c6a-47fe-9458-5e88f188085d <<: *automerge-PR risk: diff --git a/src/assets/YAML/default/CultureAndOrganization/Design.yaml b/src/assets/YAML/default/CultureAndOrganization/Design.yaml index 5925ae9..62fc8b8 100755 --- a/src/assets/YAML/default/CultureAndOrganization/Design.yaml +++ b/src/assets/YAML/default/CultureAndOrganization/Design.yaml @@ -88,25 +88,6 @@ Culture and Organization: comments: "" Conduction of simple threat modeling on technical level: uuid: 47419324-e263-415b-815d-e7161b6b905e - risk: - Technical related threats are discovered too late in the development and - deployment process. - measure: - Threat modeling of technical features is performed during the product - sprint planning. - difficultyOfImplementation: - knowledge: 2 - time: 3 - resources: 1 - usefulness: 3 - level: 1 - implementation: - - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/whiteboard - - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/miro-or-any-other-c - - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/draw-io - - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/threat-modeling-play - - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/owasp-samm - - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/threat-matrix-for-storage description: | # OWASP SAMM Description Threat modeling is a structured activity for identifying, evaluating, and managing system threats, architectural design flaws, and recommended security mitigations. It is typically done as part of the design phase or as part of a security assessment. @@ -150,6 +131,26 @@ Culture and Organization: GraphQL queries are dynamically translated to SQL, Elasticsearch and NoSQL queries. Access to data is protected with basic auth set to _1234:1234_ for development purposes. Source: OWASP Project Integration Project + risk: + Technical related threats are discovered too late in the development and deployment process. + measure: | + Perform threat modeling of technical features during product sprint planning using simple checklists and diagrams. Document identified threats and mitigations for new or changed functionality. + assessment: | + - Evidence of threat modeling activities exists for high-risk applications, including annotated diagrams and documented threats/mitigations. + - Activities are performed during sprint planning and involve relevant stakeholders. Outcomes are recorded and accessible for review. + level: 1 + difficultyOfImplementation: + knowledge: 2 + time: 3 + resources: 1 + usefulness: 3 + implementation: + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/whiteboard + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/miro-or-any-other-c + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/draw-io + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/threat-modeling-play + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/owasp-samm + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/threat-matrix-for-storage references: samm2: - D-TA-B-2 diff --git a/src/assets/YAML/default/CultureAndOrganization/EducationAndGuidance.yaml b/src/assets/YAML/default/CultureAndOrganization/EducationAndGuidance.yaml index 3e1cd42..4395b7b 100755 --- a/src/assets/YAML/default/CultureAndOrganization/EducationAndGuidance.yaml +++ b/src/assets/YAML/default/CultureAndOrganization/EducationAndGuidance.yaml @@ -4,19 +4,22 @@ Culture and Organization: Education and Guidance: Ad-Hoc Security trainings for software developers: uuid: 12c90cc6-3d58-4d9b-82ff-d469d2a0c298 - risk: - Understanding security is hard and personnel needs to be trained on it. - Otherwise, flaws like an SQL Injection might be introduced into the software - which might get exploited. - measure: - Provide security awareness training for all personnel involved in software - development Ad-Hoc. + description: | + Ad-hoc security training provides basic awareness of software security risks and best practices to developers and other personnel involved in software development. These trainings are delivered as needed, without a fixed schedule, to address immediate knowledge gaps or respond to emerging threats. + risk: | + Without any security training, personnel may lack awareness of common software vulnerabilities (such as SQL Injection and vulnerable dependencies), increasing the risk of introducing exploitable flaws into applications. + measure: | + Provide security awareness training for all personnel involved in software development on an ad-hoc basis, ensuring that relevant topics are covered when new risks or needs are identified. + assessment: | + - Conduct security training for developers and relevant personnel + - Training materials are available + - Attendance records are available + level: 1 difficultyOfImplementation: knowledge: 2 time: 1 resources: 1 usefulness: 3 - level: 1 implementation: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/owasp-juice-shop - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/owasp-cheatsheet-series @@ -409,18 +412,21 @@ Culture and Organization: comments: "" Security consulting on request: uuid: 0b28367b-75a0-4bae-a926-3725c1bf9bb0 - risk: - Not asking a security expert when questions regarding security appear - might lead to flaws. - measure: - Security consulting to teams is given on request. The security consultants - can be internal or external. + level: 1 + description: | + Security consulting on request allows teams to seek expert advice on security-related questions or challenges as they arise. This support can be provided by internal or external security consultants and helps address specific concerns during software development. + risk: | + If teams do not consult security experts when questions arise, security flaws may be introduced or remain undetected, increasing the risk of vulnerabilities in the software. + measure: | + Make security consulting available to teams on request, ensuring that expert advice is accessible when needed to address security concerns during development. + assessment: | + - Show evidence that an it security expert is available for questions at least quarterly. + - Documentation of consultations and resulting actions is available for review. difficultyOfImplementation: knowledge: 3 time: 1 resources: 1 usefulness: 3 - level: 1 implementation: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/owasp-cheatsheet-series references: diff --git a/src/assets/YAML/default/CultureAndOrganization/Process.yaml b/src/assets/YAML/default/CultureAndOrganization/Process.yaml index dace513..b769977 100755 --- a/src/assets/YAML/default/CultureAndOrganization/Process.yaml +++ b/src/assets/YAML/default/CultureAndOrganization/Process.yaml @@ -58,24 +58,23 @@ Culture and Organization: comments: "" Definition of simple BCDR practices for critical components: uuid: c72da779-86cc-45b1-a339-190ce5093171 - description: - A _Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery_ (BCDR) is a plan and a process - that helps a business to return to normal operations if a disaster occurs. - risk: + description: | + Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery (BCDR) is a plan and a process that enable an organization to quickly restore normal operations after a disruptive event, such as a cyberattack or natural disaster. + risk: | If the disaster recovery actions are not clear, you risk slow reaction and remediation delays. This applies to cyber attacks as well as natural emergencies, such as a power outage. - measure: - By understanding and documenting a business continuity and disaster - recovery (BCDR) plan, the overall availability of systems and applications - is increased. Success factors like responsibilities, Service Level Agreements, - Recovery Point Objectives, Recovery Time Objectives or Failover must be fully - documented and understood by the people involved in the recovery. + measure: | + Develop, document, and communicate a BCDR plan for all critical components. The plan must define roles and responsibilities, Service Level Agreements (SLAs), Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs), Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs), and failover procedures. Ensure all relevant personnel are trained and the plan is reviewed and updated regularly. + assessment: | + - There is a documented BCDR plan covering all critical components of the application(s). + - The plan clearly defines responsibilities, SLAs, RPOs, RTOs, and failover steps. + - Relevant staff are aware of the plan, and evidence of regular review and testing is available. + level: 1 difficultyOfImplementation: knowledge: 4 time: 3 resources: 2 usefulness: 4 - level: 1 implementation: [] references: samm2: diff --git a/src/assets/YAML/default/Implementation/ApplicationHardening.yaml b/src/assets/YAML/default/Implementation/ApplicationHardening.yaml index d1e9555..fde532a 100755 --- a/src/assets/YAML/default/Implementation/ApplicationHardening.yaml +++ b/src/assets/YAML/default/Implementation/ApplicationHardening.yaml @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ Implementation: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/owasp-asvs - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/owasp-masvs - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/apimaturity + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/api-myths references: samm2: - D-SR-A-2 @@ -172,6 +173,7 @@ Implementation: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/owasp-asvs - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/owasp-masvs - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/apimaturity + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/api-myths references: samm2: - D-SR-A-3 @@ -202,6 +204,7 @@ Implementation: implementation: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/owasp-asvs - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/owasp-masvs + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/api-myths references: samm2: - D-SR-A-3 diff --git a/src/assets/YAML/default/Implementation/DevelopmentAndSourceControl.yaml b/src/assets/YAML/default/Implementation/DevelopmentAndSourceControl.yaml index 3d02cb1..9a49570 100755 --- a/src/assets/YAML/default/Implementation/DevelopmentAndSourceControl.yaml +++ b/src/assets/YAML/default/Implementation/DevelopmentAndSourceControl.yaml @@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ Implementation: description: "" implementation: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/stylecop - - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/sonarqube + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/sonarqube-lint + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/eslint references: samm2: - V-ST-A-1 @@ -84,12 +85,17 @@ Implementation: - Peer review - four eyes principle is not explicitly required by ISO 27001 - 5.3 - 8.25 - Versioning: + Version control: uuid: 066084c6-1135-4635-9cc5-9e75c7c5459f - risk: Deployment of untracked artifacts. - description: Use a version control system platform like Github, Gitlab, Bitbucket, gittea,... to version your code. + description: + Use a _version control system_ like Github, Gitlab, Bitbucket, etc to version your source code. + + Also known as _source control_, _revision control_, or _source code management_. + risk: + Without version control, it is challenging to track changes, collaborate effectively, and maintain a history of code modifications. + Rollback to earlier versions is hard. measure: >- - Version artifacts in order to identify deployed features and issues. + Version your source code in order to identify deployed features and issues. This includes application and infrastructure code, jenkins configuration, container and virtual machine images definitions. difficultyOfImplementation: knowledge: 3 @@ -97,8 +103,6 @@ Implementation: resources: 3 usefulness: 5 level: 1 - dependsOn: - - Defined deployment process implementation: [] references: samm2: diff --git a/src/assets/YAML/default/Implementation/InfrastructureHardening.yaml b/src/assets/YAML/default/Implementation/InfrastructureHardening.yaml index ab2f023..6d789b5 100755 --- a/src/assets/YAML/default/Implementation/InfrastructureHardening.yaml +++ b/src/assets/YAML/default/Implementation/InfrastructureHardening.yaml @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ Implementation: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/a-complete-backup-of - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/a-point-in-time-reco dependsOn: - - Defined deployment process + - 74938a3f-1269-49b9-9d0f-c43a79a1985a # Defined deployment process references: samm2: - TODO @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ Implementation: usefulness: 4 level: 4 dependsOn: - - Defined deployment process + - 67e1a9aa-9fbf-4ec5-a2de-400f01960c51 # Automated deployment process - Infrastructure as Code implementation: [] references: @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ Implementation: or to modify information unauthorized on systems. measure: The usage of a (role based) access control helps to restrict system - access to authorized users. And enhancement is to use attribute based access control. + access to authorized users. And enhancement is to use *attribute based access control*. difficultyOfImplementation: knowledge: 2 time: 3 @@ -324,9 +324,6 @@ Implementation: implementation: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/directory-service - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/plugins - dependsOn: - - Defined deployment process - - Defined build process references: samm2: - O-EM-A-2 @@ -339,16 +336,18 @@ Implementation: comments: "" Simple access control for systems: uuid: 82e499d1-f463-4a4b-be90-68812a874af6 - risk: Attackers a gaining access to internal systems and application interfaces + description: Basic access control for internal systems is implemented. + risk: Attackers a gaining access to other internal systems and application interfaces is one breach occurs. measure: All internal systems are using simple authentication + assessment: | + - Presenting the documentation of the review of all user privileges yearly. + - Presenting the admin count and validating that there are less than 5 admins per system. difficultyOfImplementation: knowledge: 3 time: 3 resources: 3 usefulness: 5 level: 1 - dependsOn: - - Defined deployment process implementation: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/http-basic-authentic - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/vpn @@ -603,7 +602,7 @@ Implementation: usefulness: 4 level: 2 dependsOn: - - Defined deployment process + - 74938a3f-1269-49b9-9d0f-c43a79a1985a # Defined deployment process implementation: [] references: samm2: @@ -678,7 +677,8 @@ Implementation: level: 3 dependsOn: - Context-aware output encoding - implementation: [] + implementation: + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/api-myths references: samm2: - O-EM-A-1 @@ -716,7 +716,8 @@ Implementation: level: 4 dependsOn: - WAF baseline - implementation: [] + implementation: + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/api-myths references: samm2: - O-EM-A-2 @@ -759,7 +760,8 @@ Implementation: level: 5 dependsOn: - WAF medium - implementation: [] + implementation: + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/api-myths references: samm2: - O-EM-A-2 diff --git a/src/assets/YAML/default/InformationGathering/Logging.yaml b/src/assets/YAML/default/InformationGathering/Logging.yaml index 75d889e..a718b45 100755 --- a/src/assets/YAML/default/InformationGathering/Logging.yaml +++ b/src/assets/YAML/default/InformationGathering/Logging.yaml @@ -31,19 +31,20 @@ Information Gathering: - 8.15 Centralized system logging: uuid: 4eced38a-7904-4c45-adb0-50b663065540 - risk: - Local stored system logs can be unauthorized manipulated by attackers - or might be corrupt after an incident. In addition, it is hard to perform - a aggregation of logs. - measure: - By using centralized logging logs are protected against unauthorized - modification. + description: | + Centralized system logging involves collecting and storing system logs from multiple sources in a secure, central location. This approach improves log integrity, simplifies monitoring, and enables efficient incident response. + risk: | + Locally stored system logs can be manipulated by attackers unauthorized or might be corrupt or lost after an incident. In addition, it is hard to perform aggregation of logs. + measure: | + - Implement a centralized logging solution for all critical systems. + - System logs must be stored in a central repository, protected from unauthorized access and modification. + - Ensure that log collection is automated and covers all relevant system events. + level: 1 difficultyOfImplementation: knowledge: 1 time: 1 resources: 1 usefulness: 2 - level: 1 implementation: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/rsyslog - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/logstash diff --git a/src/assets/YAML/default/InformationGathering/Monitoring.yaml b/src/assets/YAML/default/InformationGathering/Monitoring.yaml index c1e4fce..2d0b6f8 100755 --- a/src/assets/YAML/default/InformationGathering/Monitoring.yaml +++ b/src/assets/YAML/default/InformationGathering/Monitoring.yaml @@ -127,8 +127,7 @@ Information Gathering: level: 4 dependsOn: - Visualized metrics - implementation: - - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/https-ht-transpare + implementation: [] references: samm2: - O-IM-A-2 @@ -295,8 +294,11 @@ Information Gathering: comments: "" Simple application metrics: uuid: e9a6d403-a467-445e-b98a-74f0c29da0b1 - risk: Attacks on an application are not recognized. - measure: |- + description: | + Collecting basic operational data from applications, such as authentication attempts, transaction volumes, and resource usage, will help detect abnormal patterns that may indicate security incidents or system issues. + risk: | + Without monitoring application metrics, attacks or abnormal behaviors may go undetected, increasing the risk of successful exploitation, data breaches, and delayed incident response. + measure: | Gathering of application metrics helps to identify incidents like brute force attacks, login/logout patterns, and unusual spikes in activity. Key metrics to monitor include: - Authentication attempts (successful/failed logins) - Transaction volumes and patterns (e.g. orders, payments) @@ -307,14 +309,16 @@ Information Gathering: Example: An e-commerce application normally processes 100 orders per hour. A sudden spike to 1000 orders per hour could indicate either: - A legitimate event (unannounced marketing campaign, viral social media post) - A security incident (automated bulk purchase bots, credential stuffing attack) - + By monitoring these basic metrics, teams can quickly investigate abnormal patterns and determine if they represent security incidents requiring response. + assessment: | + - Basic application metrics are collected and reviewed. + level: 1 difficultyOfImplementation: knowledge: 2 time: 2 resources: 2 usefulness: 5 - level: 1 implementation: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/prometheus references: @@ -327,18 +331,21 @@ Information Gathering: comments: "" Simple budget metrics: uuid: f08a3219-6941-43ec-8762-4aff739f4664 - risk: - Not getting notified about reaching the end of the budget (e.g. due to - a denial of service) creates unexpected costs. - measure: - Cloud providers often provide insight into budgets. A threshold and - alarming for the budget is set. + description: | + Monitoring resource usage and costs to prevent unexpected expenses. This is especially important in cloud environments where resource consumption can quickly exceed planned budgets. + risk: | + Failure to monitor budget metrics can result in unexpected costs, financial loss, and potential service disruption due to resource exhaustion or denial-of-service attacks. + measure: | + Set up budget monitoring and alerting for all critical resources. Use provider tools to track spending and configure alerts when thresholds are reached. Implement hard limits where possible to prevent budget overruns. + assessment: | + - The organization regularly monitors budget metrics + - Alerting outside given thresholds are implemented + level: 1 difficultyOfImplementation: knowledge: 1 time: 1 resources: 1 usefulness: 5 - level: 1 implementation: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/collected references: @@ -353,21 +360,20 @@ Information Gathering: comments: "" Simple system metrics: uuid: 3d1f4c3b-f713-46d9-933a-54a014a26c03 - risk: - Without simple metrics analysis of incidents are hard. In case an application - uses a lot of CPU from time to time, it is hard for a developer to find out - the source with Linux commands. - measure: - Gathering of system metrics helps to identify incidents and specially - bottlenecks like in CPU usage, memory usage and hard disk usage. + description: | + Monitoring basic system performance data, such as CPU, memory, and disk usage, will help identify performance bottlenecks and potential security incidents. + risk: | + Without monitoring system metrics, it is difficult to detect incidents or performance issues, leading to delayed response, reduced availability, and increased risk of undetected attacks. + measure: | + Collect and monitor key system metrics, including CPU, memory, and disk usage. + assessment: | + - Basic system metrics are monitored and reviewed regularly + level: 1 difficultyOfImplementation: knowledge: 2 time: 2 resources: 2 usefulness: 5 - assessment: | - Are system metrics gathered? - level: 1 implementation: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/collected references: diff --git a/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/ApplicationTests.yaml b/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/ApplicationTests.yaml index b4bb808..4266f36 100755 --- a/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/ApplicationTests.yaml +++ b/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/ApplicationTests.yaml @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ Test and Verification: level: 4 implementation: [] dependsOn: - - Defined deployment process + - 67e1a9aa-9fbf-4ec5-a2de-400f01960c51 # Automated deployment process references: samm2: - V-RT-A-3 diff --git a/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/Consolidation.yaml b/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/Consolidation.yaml index 1b87b98..c012cca 100755 --- a/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/Consolidation.yaml +++ b/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/Consolidation.yaml @@ -137,10 +137,17 @@ Test and Verification: comments: "" Simple false positive treatment: uuid: c1acc8af-312e-4503-a817-a26220c993a0 - risk: - As false positive occur during each test, all vulnerabilities might be - ignored. Specially, if tests are automated an run daily. - measure: |- + description: | + Security tests may produce false positives (or _"false alarms"_), findings that are incorrectly identified as vulnerabilities. + + It is important distinguish these from true positive vulnerabilities to avoid wasting time and resources on non-issues. + + False positive treatment ensures that findings from security tests are triaged and documented, allowing teams to distinguish between real vulnerabilities and false positives. This reduces unnecessary work and helps maintain focus on true risks. + + Some positive findings might be considered an _accepted risk_ by the organization. This must also be documented. + risk: | + If false positives are not managed, teams may ignore all findings, leading to real vulnerabilities being overlooked and increasing the risk of exploitation. Specially, if tests are automated an run daily. + measure: | Findings from security tests must be triaged and outcomes persisted/documented to: - Prevent re-analysis of known issues in subsequent test runs - Track accepted risks vs false positives @@ -152,12 +159,14 @@ Test and Verification: - [OWASP Dependency Check](https://jeremylong.github.io/DependencyCheck/general/suppression.html) - [Kubescape with VEX](https://kubescape.io/blog/2023/12/07/kubescape-support-for-vex-generation/) - [OWASP DefectDojo Risk Acceptance](https://docs.defectdojo.com/en/working_with_findings/findings_workflows/risk_acceptances/) and [False Positive Handling](https://docs.defectdojo.com/en/working_with_findings/intro_to_findings/#triage-vulnerabilities-using-finding-status) + assessment: | + A process is defined for triaging and documenting false positives and accepted risks + level: 1 difficultyOfImplementation: knowledge: 1 time: 1 resources: 1 usefulness: 4 - level: 1 implementation: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/owasp-defectdojo - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/purify @@ -171,6 +180,7 @@ Test and Verification: - Not explicitly covered by ISO 27001 - too specific - 5.27 isImplemented: false + tags: ["false-positive", "defect-management", "scanning", "sca", "sats", "dast"] evidence: "" comments: "" Artifact-based false positive treatment: @@ -212,7 +222,7 @@ Test and Verification: iso27001-2022: - 5.25 - 5.27 - tags: ["false-positive", "defect-management"] + tags: ["false-positive", "defect-management", "scanning", "sca", "sats", "dast"] Simple visualization of defects: uuid: 55f4c916-3a34-474d-ad96-9a9f7a4f6a83 risk: @@ -269,19 +279,24 @@ Test and Verification: - 5.25 tags: ["vuln-action", "defect-management"] comments: "" - Treatment of defects with severity high or higher: + Treatment of defects with high or critical severity: uuid: 44f2c8a9-4aaa-4c72-942d-63f78b89f385 - risk: Vulnerabilities with severity high or higher are not visible. - measure: - Vulnerabilities with severity high or higher are added to the quality - gate. + description: | + All security problems that are rated as "high" or "critical" must be fixed before the software can be released or used in production. This means that if a serious vulnerability is found, it cannot be ignored or postponed. + risk: | + If serious security problems are not fixed, attackers could exploit them to steal data, disrupt services, or cause other harm. Ignoring these issues puts the organization, its customers, and its reputation at risk. + measure: | + - Make it a rule that all _high_ or _critical_ security findings must be fixed before the software is approved for release or use. + - Track these issues and make sure they are resolved quickly. + assessment: | + - Provide evidence that vulnerabilities are treated within the defined time frame in production. For example via the DSOMM activity [Number of vulnerabilities/severity](./activity-description?uuid=bc548cba-cb82-4f76-bd4b-325d9d256279) or [Patching mean time to resolution via PR](./activity-description?uuid=86d490b9-d798-4a5b-a011-ab9688014c46) with extra deployment statistics. + comments: False positive analysis, specially for static analysis, is time consuming. + level: 1 difficultyOfImplementation: knowledge: 2 time: 2 resources: 1 usefulness: 4 - level: 1 - comments: False positive analysis, specially for static analysis, is time consuming. references: samm2: - I-DM-A-2 @@ -291,10 +306,12 @@ Test and Verification: iso27001-2022: - 8.8 - 5.25 - implementation: [] + implementation: + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/trivy + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/grype tags: ["vuln-action", "defect-management"] evidence: "" - Treatment of defects with severity middle: + Treatment of defects with medium severity: uuid: 9cac3341-fe83-4079-bef2-bfc4279eb594 risk: Vulnerabilities with severity middle are not visible. measure: Vulnerabilities with severity middle are added to the quality gate. diff --git a/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/StaticDepthForApplications.yaml b/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/StaticDepthForApplications.yaml index 0388402..21a7637 100755 --- a/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/StaticDepthForApplications.yaml +++ b/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/StaticDepthForApplications.yaml @@ -304,7 +304,8 @@ Test and Verification: implementation: - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/pmd - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/stylecop - - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/sonarqube + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/eslint + - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/sonarqube-lint - $ref: src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml#/implementations/github-super-linter references: samm2: @@ -322,16 +323,21 @@ Test and Verification: comments: "" Exploit likelihood estimation: uuid: f2f0f274-c1a0-4501-92fe-7fc4452bc8ad - risk: |- + description: | + Severity-based vulnerability triage alone generates a lot false positives, requiring a more refined approach. + + Use the likelihood of exploitation by using *known exploited vulnerabilities* (CISA KEV), or prediction models such as + *Exploit Prediction Scoring System* (EPSS). + risk: | Without proper prioritization, organizations may waste time and effort on low-risk vulnerabilities while neglecting critical ones. - measure: Estimate the likelihood of exploitation by using data (CISA KEV) from the past or prediction models (e.g. Exploit Prediction Scoring System, EPSS). - description: Severity-based vulnerability triage alone generates a lot false positives, requiring a more refined approach. + measure: | + Use CISA KEV and EPSS to prioritize vulnerabilities that are more likely to be exploited. difficultyOfImplementation: knowledge: 2 time: 2 resources: 2 usefulness: 4 - level: 3 + level: 2 dependsOn: - d918cd44-a972-43e9-a974-eff3f4a5dcfe # SCA for server implementation: @@ -373,6 +379,7 @@ Test and Verification: iso27001-2022: - 8.8 isImplemented: false + tags: ["defect-management", "sca"] evidence: "" comments: "" Software Composition Analysis (server side): @@ -408,6 +415,7 @@ Test and Verification: - 8.8 tags: - vmm-testing + tags: ["false-positive", "defect-management", "scanning", "sca", "sats", "dast"] Usage of multiple analyzers: uuid: 297be001-8d94-41ee-ab29-207020d423c0 risk: diff --git a/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/StaticDepthForInfrastructure.yaml b/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/StaticDepthForInfrastructure.yaml index c0d569d..47e6d25 100755 --- a/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/StaticDepthForInfrastructure.yaml +++ b/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/StaticDepthForInfrastructure.yaml @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ Test and Verification: iso27001-2022: - 8.8 isImplemented: false + tags: ["scanning", "sca"] evidence: "" comments: "" Test for malware: diff --git a/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/Test-Intensity.yaml b/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/Test-Intensity.yaml index d9f1566..398d2cf 100755 --- a/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/Test-Intensity.yaml +++ b/src/assets/YAML/default/TestAndVerification/Test-Intensity.yaml @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # yaml-language-server: $schema=../../schemas/dsomm-schema-test-and-verification.json --- Test and Verification: - Test-Intensity: + Test Intensity: Creation and application of a testing concept: uuid: 79ef8103-e1ed-4055-8df8-fd2b2015bebe risk: Scans might use a too small or too high test intensity. diff --git a/src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml b/src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml index 3354fe0..8d590ae 100755 --- a/src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml +++ b/src/assets/YAML/default/implementations.yaml @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ implementations: uuid: 86c6bdba-73c0-4c99-bbda-81b85c9fe2a4 name: Enforcement of commit signing tags: [signing] - url: https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/defining-the-mergeability-of-pull-requests/managing-a-branch-protection-rule + url: https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-protected-branches/managing-a-branch-protection-rule description: |- Usage of branch protection rules signing-of-commits: @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ implementations: name: API Security Maturity Model for Authorization tags: [api] url: https://curity.io/resources/learn/the-api-security-maturity-model/ - container-technologi: + container-technology: uuid: ed6b6340-6c7f-4e13-8937-f560d3f5db11 name: Container technologies and orchestration like Docker, Kubernetes tags: [] @@ -70,11 +70,16 @@ implementations: uuid: 9af7624e-0729-4eeb-b257-ebaf65f70355 name: A Point in Time Recovery for databases should be implemented. tags: [] - blue-green-deploymen: + blue-green-deployment: uuid: 4fb3d95c-07c0-4cbb-b396-5054aba751c2 name: Blue/Green Deployments tags: [] url: https://martinfowler.com/bliki/BlueGreenDeployment.html + canary-deployment: + uuid: cd49f792-a158-4b93-ac55-fd773954b217 + name: Canary release + tags: [] + url: https://martinfowler.com/bliki/CanaryRelease.html docker: uuid: cc47b2e3-6ee5-4926-af3a-d418ef91c8ba name: Docker @@ -92,15 +97,15 @@ implementations: kubernetes-admission: uuid: 2a76300f-6b1f-4a51-b925-134c36b723af name: - Kubernetes Admission Controller can whitelist registries and/or whitelist - a signing key. + Kubernetes Admission Controller can whitelist registries and/or whitelist a signing key. tags: [] url: https://medium.com/slalom-technology/build-a-kubernetes-dynamic-admission-controller-for-container-registry-whitelisting-b46fe020e22d + test-url-expects: [403] dependabot: uuid: d6292c7d-aab7-43d3-a7c6-1e443b5c1aa4 name: dependabot tags: ["auto-pr", "patching"] - url: https://dependabot.com/ + url: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/getting-started/dependabot-quickstart-guide renovate: uuid: 8228266e-e04f-40ba-94c8-bfadc5310920 name: renovate @@ -111,9 +116,14 @@ implementations: name: Jenkins tags: [] url: https://www.jenkins.io/ + maven: + uuid: eb6de6b9-e060-4902-ae6f-604ffc386b63 + name: Maven + tags: [] + url: https://maven.apache.org/ sample-concept-1: uuid: 1a463242-b480-46f6-a912-b51ec1c1558d - name: "Sample concept: \n(1" + name: "Sample concept" tags: [] description: "Sample concept: \n(1) each container has a set lifetime and is\ @@ -136,12 +146,13 @@ implementations: uuid: be757cb3-63d6-4a63-9c4e-e10b746fd47a name: Fedora CoreOS tags: [] - url: https://getfedora.org/coreos + url: https://fedoraproject.org/coreos/ distroless-usage: uuid: a92c4f8f-a918-406a-b1e5-70acfc0477bd name: Distroless or Alpine tags: [] url: https://itnext.io/which-container-images-to-use-distroless-or-alpine-96e3dab43a22 + test-url-expects: [403] threat-modeling-play: uuid: fd0f282b-a065-4464-beed-770c604a5f52 name: Threat Modeling Playbook @@ -176,10 +187,10 @@ implementations: uuid: bb5b8988-021b-452a-a914-bd36887b6860 name: "Don't Forget EVIL User stories" tags: [] - url: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Agile_Software_Development + url: https://medium.com/serious-scrum/evil-user-storys-story-telling-for-it-security-e4a9ec94193c + test-url-expects: [403] description: - "[Do not Forget EVIL User Stories](https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Agile_Software_Development:_Don%27t_Forget_EVIL_User_Stories)\ - \ and [Practical Security Stories and Security Tasks for Agile Development Environments](https://safecode.org/publication/SAFECode_Agile_Dev_Security0712.pdf)" + "Do not Forget _Evil_ User Stories and [Practical Security Stories and Security Tasks for Agile Development Environments](https://safecode.org/publication/SAFECode_Agile_Dev_Security0712.pdf)" libyear: uuid: 2fff917f-205e-4eab-2e0e-1fab8c04bf33 name: libyear @@ -191,7 +202,7 @@ implementations: uuid: 1fff917f-205e-4eab-ae0e-1fab8c04bf3a name: OWASP Juice Shop tags: [training] - url: https://github.com/bkimminich/juice-shop + url: https://github.com/juice-shop/juice-shop description: |- In case you do not have the budget to hire an external security expert, an option is to use the OWASP JuiceShop on a "hacking Friday" owasp-cheatsheet-series: @@ -248,7 +259,7 @@ implementations: uuid: 7bf90650-a53a-4581-a214-1afd5de3a059 name: OWASP MASVS tags: [] - url: https://github.com/OWASP/owasp-masvs + url: https://github.com/OWASP/masvs cis-kubernetes-benchmark: uuid: edaec98d-dac7-4dfd-8ab3-42c471d5b9ff name: CIS Kubernetes Benchmark for Security @@ -285,7 +296,7 @@ implementations: uuid: 9fbc47ad-82bc-46d1-bba9-66815ab79935 name: Attack Matrix Kubernetes tags: [mitre] - url: https://www.microsoft.com/security/blog/2020/04/02/attack-matrix-kubernetes/ + url: https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/security/blog/2020/04/02/attack-matrix-kubernetes/ description: |- Attack matrix for kubernetes istio: @@ -373,12 +384,12 @@ implementations: uuid: 41fda224-2980-443c-bfd4-0a1d4b520cb9 name: HTTP-Basic Authentication tags: [] - url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/dao/artifact/d3f:WebAuthentication/ + url: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Guides/Authentication vpn: uuid: e506f60b-747b-44b1-8fe8-f67ccd8f290e name: VPN tags: [] - url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/dao/artifact/d3f:VPN/ + url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/dao/artifact/d3f:VPNServer/ for-applications-ch: uuid: d7fb1f5a-05e3-49f7-ae67-00bfb8f8410c name: "For applications: Check default encoding" @@ -396,7 +407,7 @@ implementations: uuid: ba6bd46c-2069-4f4d-b26c-7334a7553339 name: authentication tags: [] - url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/dao/artifact/d3f:Authentication/ + url: https://d3fend.mitre.org/dao/artifact/d3f:AuthenticationServer/ rsyslog: uuid: 79f88310-d63e-471d-8e63-8c77f2281b66 name: rsyslog @@ -405,7 +416,7 @@ implementations: logstash: uuid: 7a8fad2e-d642-4972-8501-74591b23feab name: logstash - url: https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/logstash/current/getting-started-with-logstash.html + url: https://www.elastic.co/docs/reference/logstash/getting-started-with-logstash tags: [tool, logging] fluentd: uuid: f5da3a20-ab64-4ecf-b4e1-660c80036e45 @@ -436,13 +447,7 @@ implementations: uuid: 38fe9d00-df8b-44b6-910d-ca0f02b5c5d3 name: ELK-Stack tags: [] - url: https://www.elastic.co/elk-stack - https-ht-transpare: - uuid: 84ef86ea-ada4-4e10-ae4f-a5bb77dcae5d - name: https://ht.transpare - tags: [] - url: https://ht.transparencytoolkit.org/FileServer/FileServer/OLD - description: https://ht.transparencytoolkit.org/FileServer/FileServer/OLD%20Fileserver/books/SICUREZZA/Addison.Wesley.Security.Metrics.Mar.2007.pdf + url: https://www.elastic.co/elastic-stack/ prometheus: uuid: ddf221df-3517-42e4-b23d-c1d9a162744c name: Prometheus @@ -456,7 +461,7 @@ implementations: uuid: cc2eec82-f3a7-4ae5-9ccb-3d75352b2e4d name: JUnit tags: [unittest] - url: https://junit.org/junit5/ + url: https://junit.org/ karma: uuid: fd56720a-ad4b-487c-b4c3-897a688672c4 name: Karma @@ -513,7 +518,7 @@ implementations: uuid: 7063cf8c-cd98-480f-8ef7-11cf241d2366 name: OWASP Code Pulse tags: [] - url: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Code_Pulse + url: https://owasp.org/www-project-code-pulse/ ajax-spider: uuid: 6583fd5f-4314-4b39-9265-de72f861c8cb name: Ajax Spider @@ -568,7 +573,7 @@ implementations: uuid: b99c9d52-dd1a-4aef-8699-65173cf978ce name: HTC Hydra tags: [password] - url: https://www.htc-cs.com/en/products/htc-hydra/ + url: https://github.com/vanhauser-thc/thc-hydra netassert: uuid: fffa6fb9-1fae-4852-88dc-c7086961330c name: netassert @@ -583,7 +588,7 @@ implementations: uuid: f085295e-46a3-4c8d-bbc3-1ac6b9dfcf2a name: OWASP Amass tags: [] - url: https://github.com/OWASP/Amass + url: https://github.com/owasp-amass/amass k8spurger: uuid: 8fea20ad-e332-4aa8-b1f1-aa9deb635dc1 name: K8sPurger @@ -625,6 +630,7 @@ implementations: name: npm audit tags: [] url: https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/audit + test-url-expects: [301] sigmahq: uuid: 1adf1ac0-8572-407b-a358-3976d9a225e2 name: SigmaHQ @@ -636,7 +642,7 @@ implementations: tags: [] url: https://github.com/wagoodman/dive clusterscanner: - url: https://github.com/SDA-SE/clusterscanner + url: https://github.com/SDA-SE/cluster-image-scanner uuid: 3c9ac78c-0fd4-43f4-8211-c915f9ef685f name: ClusterScanner tags: @@ -694,7 +700,7 @@ implementations: uuid: d90fefc9-4e5d-420f-ac87-eeb165bf0ee6 name: truffleHog tags: [] - url: https://github.com/dxa4481/truffleHog + url: https://github.com/trufflesecurity/trufflehog go-pillage-registrie: uuid: 382873e2-8604-4410-ae5e-b0f5ccdee835 name: go-pillage-registries @@ -702,9 +708,19 @@ implementations: url: https://github.com/nccgroup/go-pillage-registries trivy: uuid: 7f500e95-2110-44c4-a1f8-cd7ef5d9eb6b - name: https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy + name: Trivy tags: [] url: https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy + syft: + uuid: 7543a6f2-3850-47a9-bb2f-0987e2af6f6a + name: Syft + tags: [sbom, dependency] + url: https://github.com/anchore/syft + grype: + uuid: 7970af6e-a7d3-4359-a6ea-301d26b16329 + name: Grype + tags: [sbom, dependency, vulnerability] + url: https://github.com/anchore/grype registries-like-quay: uuid: 8737c6c0-4e90-400a-bf9a-f8e399913b57 name: Registries like quay @@ -721,38 +737,40 @@ implementations: threat-matrix-for-storage: uuid: 1c56dbea-e067-44e2-8d3b-0a1205a70617 name: Threat Matrix for Storage - url: https://www.microsoft.com/security/blog/2021/04/08/threat-matrix-for-storage/ + url: https://www.microsoft.com/en-US/security/blog/2021/04/08/threat-matrix-for-storage/ tags: [documentation, storage, cluster, kubernetes] defend-the-core-kubernetes: uuid: b7a92886-aec9-4bf4-94c4-07cc191a97af name: Defend the core kubernetes security at every layer - url: https://thenewstack.io/defend-the-core-kubernetes-security-at-every-layer/ + url: https://thenewstack.io/defend-the-core-kubernetes-security-at-every-layer/ tags: [documentation, cluster, kubernetes] business-friendly-vulnerability-metrics: uuid: 3b99799c-e875-4cc2-aad7-5ce4564a1cde name: Business friendly vulnerability management metrics url: https://medium.com/uber-security-privacy/business-friendly-vulnerability-management-metrics-cfd702fd7705 + test-url-expects: [403] tags: [documentation, vulnerability, vulnerability management system] kubescape: uuid: 893d9f37-2142-4490-996c-e43b55064d3d name: kubescape - url: https://github.com/armosec/kubescape + url: https://github.com/kubescape/kubescape tags: [kubernetes, vulnerability, misconfiguration] description: _Testing if Kubernetes is deployed securely as defined in Kubernetes Hardening Guidance by to NSA and CISA_ azuredevops: uuid: b1b88bc5-5a22-4888-a27b-acce3d9fe29a name: Improve code quality with branch policies - url: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/repos/git/branch-policies?view=azure-devops + url: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/repos/git/branch-policies?view=azure-devops tags: [source-code-protection, scm] github-policies: uuid: 99211481-de9c-4358-880e-628366416a27 name: About protected branches - url: https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/defining-the-mergeability-of-pull-requests/about-protected-branches + url: https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/managing-protected-branches/about-protected-branches tags: [source-code-protection, scm] - sonarqube: + sonarqube-lint: uuid: aa5ded61-5380-4da6-9474-afc36a397682 name: In-Depth Linting of Your TypeScript While Coding - url: https://blog.sonarsource.com/in-depth-linting-of-your-typescript-while-coding + url: https://medium.com/@elenavilchik/in-depth-linting-of-your-typescript-while-coding-1d084affbf0 + test-url-expects: [403] tags: [ide, linting] stylecop: uuid: 0b7ec352-0c36-4de1-8912-617fc6c608fe @@ -763,26 +781,29 @@ implementations: uuid: 5b52a841-c281-45fd-b68f-0a93aa6fa398 name: Fortify Extension for Visual Studio Code url: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=fortifyvsts.fortify-extension-for-vs-code + test-url-expects: [404] tags: [ide, sast] appscan-vscode-extension: uuid: 3f5a493d-12d0-4468-b9fa-c3e4eae89ffb name: HCL AppScan CodeSweep url: https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=HCLTechnologies.hclappscancodesweep + test-url-expects: [404] tags: [ide, sast] checkmarx-vscode-extension: uuid: cf1213fd-8bfa-4a97-bf8b-937c93f31005 name: Setting Up the Visual Studio Code Extension Plugin url: https://checkmarx.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SD/pages/1759216424/Setting+Up+the+Visual+Studio+Code+Extension+Plugin + test-url-expects: [302] tags: [ide, sast] pre-commit-microsoft: uuid: 58ac9dea-b6c7-4698-904e-df89a9451c82 name: DevSecOps control Pre-commit - url: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cloud-adoption-framework/secure/devsecops-controls#plan-and-develop + url: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/security/zero-trust/develop/secure-devops-environments-zero-trust tags: [pre-commit] pre-commit-synopsis: uuid: 8da8d115-0f4e-40f0-a3ce-484a49e845fb name: Building your DevSecOps pipeline 5 essential activities - url: https://www.synopsys.com/blogs/software-security/devsecops-pipeline-checklist/ + url: https://www.blackduck.com/blog/devsecops-pipeline-checklist/ tags: [pre-commit] dependencyTrack: uuid: 500399bd-7dfc-47fd-99d8-b55cefb760a9 @@ -818,7 +839,7 @@ implementations: uuid: f011de6e-ab7c-4ec7-af55-03427271ab32 name: Coverage.py tags: [testing, coverage] - url: https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy + url: https://github.com/coveragepy/coveragepy description: | Code coverage measurement for Python github-dependabot: @@ -875,6 +896,7 @@ implementations: name: terraform tags: [IaC] url: https://www.terraform.io/ + test-url-expects: [308] description: | Terraform enables infrastructure automation for provisioning, compliance, and management of any cloud, datacenter, and service. packj: @@ -884,7 +906,7 @@ implementations: url: https://github.com/ossillate-inc/packj description: | Packj is a tool to detect software supply chain attacks. It can detect malicious, vulnerable, abandoned, typo-squatting, and other "risky" packages from popular open-source package registries, such as NPM, RubyGems, and PyPI. - apiMyth: + api-myths: uuid: 6150533e-58ca-4b52-a9b2-6226545d9ea0 name: Top 5 API Security Myths That Are Crushing Your Business tags: [documentation, waf] diff --git a/yaml-generation/generateDimensions.php b/yaml-generation/generateDimensions.php index 8c4ad58..5a504d7 100644 --- a/yaml-generation/generateDimensions.php +++ b/yaml-generation/generateDimensions.php @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ $inputFolder = "src/assets/YAML"; $implementationReferenceFile = "$inputFolder/default/implementations.yaml"; -if (getenv('GITHUB_ACTIONS')) { +if (getenv('DSOMM_VERSION')) { // version comes as an arg to Dockerfile $publisher = 'https://github.com/' . getenv('GITHUB_REPOSITORY'); } else { $publisher = getenv('USERNAME'); @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ if (!array_key_exists("level", $activity)) { array_push($errorMsg,"Missing 'level' attribute in activity: '$activityName'"); } - + // echo "$subdimension | $activityName\n"; if (!array_key_exists("uuid", $activity)) { array_push($errorMsg, "'$activityName' is missing an uuid in '$dimension'"); @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ if(!is_string($dependsOnName)) { array_push($errorMsg, "The 'dependsOn' is not a string '" . json_encode($dependsOnName) . "' (in $activityName)"); continue; - } + } // Load dependsOnName and dependsOnUuid, depending on actual content $uuidRegExp = "/(uuid:)?\s*([0-9a-f]{6,}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{6,})/"; @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ array_push($errorMsg,"DependsOn non-existing activity uuid: $dependsOnUuid (in activity: '$activityName')"); } else if ($matches[1] != "") { echo "WARNING: DependsOn is prefixed by deprecated 'uuid:' for $dependsOnUuid (in activity: '$activityName'). Use activity name, or the uuid only\n"; - } + } } else { $dependsOnUuid = getUuidByActivityName($dependsOnName, $dimensionsAggregated); if (is_null(getUuidByActivityName($dependsOnName, $dimensionsAggregated))) { @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ } // Trick emit_yaml() to have uuid plus a comment in a string. Removed in post-processing below. $dimensionsAggregated[$dimension][$subdimension][$activityName]["dependsOn"][$index] = "{!$dependsOnUuid!}"; - + // Build dependency graph if (!array_key_exists($activityName, $activityIndex)) { @@ -163,16 +163,6 @@ } -// Post-process to add activity name as comment for `dependsOn` -$dimensionsString = yaml_emit($dimensionsAggregated); -preg_match_all('/\{!([0-9a-z-]{30,})!\}/', $dimensionsString, $matches); -$uuids = array_unique($matches[1]); -foreach ($uuids as $uuid) { - $name = getActivityNameByUuid($uuid, $dimensionsAggregated); - // echo "Adding dependsOn-comment for $uuid: $name\n"; - $dimensionsString = str_replace("'{!$uuid!}'", "$uuid # $name", $dimensionsString); -} - // Store generated data with meta document first $metaDocument = array( 'meta' => array( @@ -243,7 +233,7 @@ function buildOpenCreUrl($dimension, $subdimension, $activityName) { $baseUrl = "https://www.opencre.org/node/standard/"; $DSOMM = "DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)"; - $url = $baseUrl . rawurlencode($DSOMM) . + $url = $baseUrl . rawurlencode($DSOMM) . "/section/" . rawurlencode($subdimension) . "/subsection/" . rawurlencode($activityName); return $url; @@ -268,7 +258,7 @@ function assertUniqueRefByKey($references, $keyToAssert, &$errorMsg) { $value = $reference[$keyToAssert]; // echo "$key: $value\n"; if (array_key_exists($value, $all_values)) { - array_push($errorMsg, "Duplicate '$keyToAssert' in reference file: " . $all_values[$value] . " and $key: $printable_keyToAssert='$value'"); + array_push($errorMsg, "Duplicate '$keyToAssert' in reference file: '" . $all_values[$value] . "' and '$key': $printable_keyToAssert='$value'"); } else { $all_values[$value] = $key; } @@ -280,7 +270,7 @@ function assertUniqueRefByKey($references, $keyToAssert, &$errorMsg) { function assertSecureUrlsInRefs($all_references, &$errorMsg) { foreach ($all_references as $references) { foreach ($references as $id => $reference) { - foreach ($reference as $key => $value) { + foreach ($reference as $key => $value) { if (is_string($value)) { // echo "KEY: $key VAL: " . var_dump($value) . "\n"; if (str_contains($value,'http://')) { @@ -301,7 +291,7 @@ function assertLiveUrlsInRefs($all_references, &$errorMsg) { if (array_key_exists('url', $reference)) { $url = $reference['url']; echo " $key: $url\n"; - $err = assertLiveUrl($reference['url']); + $err = assertLiveUrl($reference['url'], $reference['test-url-expects'] ?? []); if ($err) { echo " # $err\n"; array_push($errorMsg, "Dead ref URL ($key): $err"); @@ -314,11 +304,12 @@ function assertLiveUrlsInRefs($all_references, &$errorMsg) { } -function assertLiveUrl($url):string { +function assertLiveUrl($url, $expectedStatusCodes = []):string { $useragent = 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:135.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/135.0'; $curl = curl_init($url); curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_USERAGENT, $useragent); + curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER, ['Accept-Language: en-US,en']); curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_NOBODY, true); curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_HEADER, true); curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_FOLLOWLOCATION, false); @@ -326,28 +317,41 @@ function assertLiveUrl($url):string { curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_TIMEOUT, 5); curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_CONNECTTIMEOUT, 5); $response = curl_exec($curl); - + if (curl_errno($curl)) { echo curl_error($curl); curl_close($curl); return "No reply"; } - + // Extract header info $statusCode = curl_getinfo($curl, CURLINFO_HTTP_CODE); $redirectUrl = curl_getinfo($curl, CURLINFO_REDIRECT_URL ); curl_close($curl); - if ($statusCode == 200) { + if (isExpectedStatusCode($statusCode, $expectedStatusCodes)) { return ""; } - if ($statusCode == 301 || $statusCode == 302) { + if ($statusCode == 301 || $statusCode == 302) { return "Status code $statusCode redirects to: $redirectUrl"; } return "Status code: $statusCode: $url"; } +function isExpectedStatusCode($statusCode, $expectedStatusCodes) { + if (count($expectedStatusCodes) == 0) { + return $statusCode == 200; + } + + foreach ($expectedStatusCodes as $expectedStatusCode) { + if ($statusCode == $expectedStatusCode) { + return true; + } + } + return false; +} + /** @@ -380,7 +384,7 @@ function yaml_emit_with_header($metaDocument, $document) { // Remove trailing ... from meta document $metaString = substr(rtrim($metaString), 0, -3); } - + return $metaString . $documentString; }